Uterine Carcinosarcoma (UCS): A Literature Review and Survival Analysis from a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Mauro Francesco Pio Maiorano, Gennaro Cormio, Brigida Anna Maiorano, Vera Loizzi
Author Information
  1. Mauro Francesco Pio Maiorano: Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Policlinico of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy. ORCID
  2. Gennaro Cormio: Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Policlinico of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy. ORCID
  3. Brigida Anna Maiorano: Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy. ORCID
  4. Vera Loizzi: Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Policlinico of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Uterine carcinosarcomas (UCSs) are rare and aggressive malignancies with limited epidemiological data. This study aims to evaluate the clinical and pathological features and prognostic factors of UCS in a retrospective cohort of 80 patients, contributing to improved management strategies.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of UCS cases treated from 1995 to 2024 at three institutions. Data on demographics, clinical features, histopathology, treatment, and outcomes were collected. Overall survival (OS) and prognostic factors were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses.
RESULTS: The median age of patients was 66 years, with a median overall survival of 34.5 months. Disease recurrence occurred in 32.5% of cases, with a median disease-free interval of 17.92 months. Age, tumour stage, and size emerged as significant predictors of survival. Stage I-II patients had a significantly better prognosis than those with Stage III-IV (HR = 0.438, = 0.008). Tumour size >4 cm was associated with increased mortality (HR = 2.154, = 0.019). Lymphadenectomy was not independently associated with improved survival. Adjuvant chemotherapy, mainly carboplatin and paclitaxel, was administered to 67.5% of patients, achieving a complete response in 66.67%.
CONCLUSIONS: Tumour stage and age are significant independent predictors of survival in UCS, underscoring the need for early diagnosis and intervention. Tumour size is also crucial in determining prognosis. The role of lymphadenectomy remains uncertain, emphasizing the importance of individualized treatment approaches. Future research should explore molecular profiling to further refine prognostication and therapeutic strategies for this challenging malignancy.

Keywords

References

  1. Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Jul;162(1):235-241 [PMID: 34030871]
  2. Cureus. 2020 Sep 6;12(9):e10283 [PMID: 33042718]
  3. Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Mar;116(3):419-23 [PMID: 19896181]
  4. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Jan;23(1):196-202 [PMID: 25994210]
  5. J Clin Pathol. 2002 May;55(5):321-5 [PMID: 11986333]
  6. Nature. 2013 May 2;497(7447):67-73 [PMID: 23636398]
  7. Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Apr;93(1):204-8 [PMID: 15047237]
  8. Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Feb;160(2):586-601 [PMID: 33183764]
  9. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2013 Sep;4(3):222-8 [PMID: 24426726]
  10. J Gynecol Oncol. 2020 May;31(3):e27 [PMID: 31912681]
  11. Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Oct;111(1):82-8 [PMID: 18674808]
  12. Gynecol Oncol. 1983 Feb;15(1):10-7 [PMID: 6822361]
  13. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Nov;107(2):177-85 [PMID: 17822748]
  14. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Apr;(421):225-31 [PMID: 15123952]
  15. J Cancer. 2024 Jan 1;15(2):545-559 [PMID: 38169513]
  16. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 Sep;158(3):520-527 [PMID: 34797919]
  17. N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 19;383(21):2053-2064 [PMID: 33207095]
  18. Cancer. 2017 Mar 1;123(5):802-813 [PMID: 28061006]
  19. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2021 Jan;40(1):84-93 [PMID: 31855950]
  20. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Apr;105(1):138-44 [PMID: 17175012]
  21. J Hum Genet. 2021 Sep;66(9):853-868 [PMID: 34092788]
  22. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Jul;31(7):1075-1079 [PMID: 34226291]
  23. Cancer Cell. 2017 Mar 13;31(3):411-423 [PMID: 28292439]
  24. Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 16;15(12): [PMID: 37370830]
  25. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2013 Sep;32(5):493-500 [PMID: 23896716]
  26. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Mar 1;58(3):786-96 [PMID: 14967435]
  27. JAMA Surg. 2021 Feb 1;156(2):157-164 [PMID: 33175109]
  28. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021 Jul;163:103369 [PMID: 34051304]
  29. Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Jun;137(3):581-8 [PMID: 25805398]
  30. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022 Oct 13;: [PMID: 36229080]
  31. Gynecol Oncol. 2022 May;165(2):287-292 [PMID: 35232588]
  32. J Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Jul;32(4):e60 [PMID: 34085796]
  33. J Formos Med Assoc. 2021 Nov;120(11):1977-1987 [PMID: 33992491]
  34. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Dec;31(12):1508-1529 [PMID: 34795020]
  35. J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 06;10(7): [PMID: 33917330]
  36. Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Aug;98(2):274-80 [PMID: 15972232]
  37. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Mar;104(3):177-8 [PMID: 19135669]
  38. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023 Feb 6;33(2):147-174 [PMID: 36585027]
  39. N Engl J Med. 2011 Oct 6;365(14):1304-14 [PMID: 21991952]
  40. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2011;2011:470795 [PMID: 22007228]
  41. Life (Basel). 2023 Jul 03;13(7): [PMID: 37511876]
  42. J Clin Oncol. 1985 Sep;3(9):1240-5 [PMID: 3897471]
  43. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1990;9(2):129-36 [PMID: 2158940]
  44. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2022 Jan 17;39:100930 [PMID: 35111895]
  45. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 Jul;158(1):13-20 [PMID: 34536971]
  46. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022 May 3;32(5):676-679 [PMID: 35236752]
  47. Curr Opin Oncol. 2011 Sep;23(5):531-6 [PMID: 21743326]
  48. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2021 Oct;81(10):1145-1153 [PMID: 34629493]
  49. J Cancer Res Ther. 2014 Jul-Sep;10(3):461-8 [PMID: 25313723]
  50. J Pathol Clin Res. 2015 Apr 09;1(3):173-85 [PMID: 27499902]
  51. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Mar;18(3):384-392 [PMID: 28159465]
  52. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Mar;109(3):655-62 [PMID: 17329517]
  53. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Jan;31(1):12-39 [PMID: 33397713]
  54. Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Jul;166(1):108-116 [PMID: 35490034]
  55. Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Jul;142(1):38-43 [PMID: 27107722]
  56. Am J Surg Pathol. 2019 Nov;43(11):1493-1500 [PMID: 31478942]
  57. Mod Pathol. 2020 Jan;33(1):118-127 [PMID: 31477811]
  58. Gynecol Oncol. 2000 Feb;76(2):226-9 [PMID: 10637076]
  59. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023 Feb;21(2):181-209 [PMID: 36791750]
  60. Front Oncol. 2024 Apr 03;14:1391267 [PMID: 38634055]
  61. Pathol Oncol Res. 2021 Dec 23;27:1610013 [PMID: 35002543]
  62. J Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Nov;29(6):e88 [PMID: 30207096]
  63. PLoS One. 2022 Jul 21;17(7):e0271526 [PMID: 35862371]
  64. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):968-977 [PMID: 35007153]
  65. Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Jul;110(1):43-8 [PMID: 18445505]
  66. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Dec;31(12):1595-1601 [PMID: 34728527]
  67. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Dec;107(3):513-7 [PMID: 17935762]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0survivaluterinecarcinosarcomaUCSpatients=prognosticfactorsretrospectivestrategiesmediansize0TumourUterinerarestudyclinicalfeaturescohortimprovedcasestreatmentage66overallmonths5%tumourstagesignificantpredictorsStageprognosisHRassociatedlymphadenectomytherapeuticBACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES:carcinosarcomasUCSsaggressivemalignancieslimitedepidemiologicaldataaimsevaluatepathological80contributingmanagementMETHODS:conductedanalysistreated19952024threeinstitutionsDatademographicshistopathologyoutcomescollectedOverallOSassessedusingKaplan-MeierCoxproportionalhazardsregressionanalysesRESULTS:years345Diseaserecurrenceoccurred32disease-freeinterval1792AgeemergedI-IIsignificantlybetterIII-IV438008>4cmincreasedmortality2154019LymphadenectomyindependentlyAdjuvantchemotherapymainlycarboplatinpaclitaxeladministered67achievingcompleteresponse67%CONCLUSIONS:independentunderscoringneedearlydiagnosisinterventionalsocrucialdeterminingroleremainsuncertainemphasizingimportanceindividualizedapproachesFutureresearchexploremolecularprofilingrefineprognosticationchallengingmalignancyCarcinosarcoma:LiteratureReviewSurvivalAnalysisRetrospectiveCohortStudyMMMTuterusmalignantmixedMülleriangynaecologicalcancersstaging

Similar Articles

Cited By