Egg Cryopreservation for Social Reasons-A Literature Review.

Stavroula Kynigopoulou, Alkis Matsas, Ermioni Tsarna, Smaragdi Christopoulou, Periklis Panagopoulos, Panagiotis Bakas, Panagiotis Christopoulos
Author Information
  1. Stavroula Kynigopoulou: MSc Program "Research in Female Reproduction", Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115 28 Athens, Greece.
  2. Alkis Matsas: Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research 'N.S. Christeas', Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115 27 Athens, Greece. ORCID
  3. Ermioni Tsarna: Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Aretaieion" Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115 28 Athens, Greece. ORCID
  4. Smaragdi Christopoulou: Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Aretaieion" Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115 28 Athens, Greece.
  5. Periklis Panagopoulos: Third Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital "ATTIKON", Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 124 62 Athens, Greece.
  6. Panagiotis Bakas: Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Aretaieion" Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115 28 Athens, Greece.
  7. Panagiotis Christopoulos: Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Aretaieion" Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115 28 Athens, Greece. ORCID

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of the social reasons that lead women to consider egg cryopreservation, as well as the attitudes and knowledge of women towards this procedure. Methods: For the creation of this article, a literature review was carried out both in the existing medical literature and in search engines. The key points are as follows: (1) The main reasons women choose to delay childbearing are the lack of a suitable male partner, education and career advancement, and financial instability. Women feel societal and family pressure to have children, even though they may not feel ready. (2) Women's attitudes towards egg cryopreservation vary. While some are open to the idea, many are opposed to it, especially when it is used for non-medical reasons. There are concerns about the success rates, health risks, and ethical implications of the procedure. (3) The legal and regulatory framework around egg cryopreservation differs across countries. Some countries allow it only for medical reasons, while others have more permissive policies. The issue of who should bear the financial cost of the procedure is also debated. (4) There is a need to better educate women, as well as healthcare providers, about fertility decline and the options available for preserving fertility, including egg cryopreservation.

Keywords

References

  1. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022 Jun;44(6):1005-1014 [PMID: 35304091]
  2. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 May;38(5):1177-1186 [PMID: 33608838]
  3. J Med Ethics. 2023 Dec 14;50(1):50-56 [PMID: 37147115]
  4. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Nov;306(5):1753-1760 [PMID: 35988095]
  5. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Mar;99(3):324-332 [PMID: 31667820]
  6. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2022 Mar;67(2):178-201 [PMID: 35156301]
  7. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Mar;41(1):69-73 [PMID: 31552758]
  8. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Jun;97(6):641-647 [PMID: 29480938]
  9. Fertil Steril. 2021 May;115(5):1091-1101 [PMID: 33933172]
  10. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Jan;38(1):41-53 [PMID: 33188440]
  11. Bioethics. 2022 Jan;36(1):42-48 [PMID: 34674281]
  12. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Jan;95(1):38-44 [PMID: 26399953]
  13. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023 Nov 10;16:2379-2389 [PMID: 38024487]
  14. BJOG. 2020 Aug;127(9):e113-e121 [PMID: 32102111]
  15. World J Clin Cases. 2023 Nov 6;11(31):7553-7561 [PMID: 38078133]
  16. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Oct;217:71-76 [PMID: 28858684]
  17. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 Dec;39(12):2835-2845 [PMID: 36322229]
  18. Hum Reprod Open. 2017 Mar 29;2017(1):hox003 [PMID: 30895222]
  19. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Dec;43(4):532-540 [PMID: 35998044]
  20. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2019 Jan 29;17(1):16 [PMID: 30696433]
  21. Hum Reprod. 2011 Mar;26(3):655-61 [PMID: 21212052]
  22. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2022 Feb;51(2):102268 [PMID: 34826610]
  23. Hum Reprod. 2018 Dec 1;33(12):2222-2231 [PMID: 30383235]
  24. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Jun;40(6):1305-1311 [PMID: 37347348]
  25. Cell Transplant. 2021 Jan-Dec;30:963689721999617 [PMID: 33757335]
  26. Fertil Steril. 2016 Feb;105(2):459-66.e2 [PMID: 26604065]
  27. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Jun;36(6):1069-1080 [PMID: 31119440]
  28. Life (Basel). 2023 Aug 05;13(8): [PMID: 37629546]
  29. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 May;98(5):647-652 [PMID: 30758059]
  30. Hum Reprod. 2012 May;27(5):1231-7 [PMID: 22357771]
  31. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021 Jun;42(6):1053-1055 [PMID: 33931374]
  32. BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jan 6;22(1):4 [PMID: 33407392]
  33. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 30;18(15): [PMID: 34360381]
  34. Reprod Fertil. 2021 Mar 05;2(1):L1-L3 [PMID: 35128437]
  35. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2022 Dec;40(2):145-156 [PMID: 35306627]
  36. Semin Reprod Med. 2018 Sep;36(5):299-310 [PMID: 30947346]
  37. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Jan;38(1):101-123 [PMID: 33155089]
  38. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2022 Jan 7;20(1):10 [PMID: 34996479]
  39. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2021 Dec 10;14:239-250 [PMID: 35252599]
  40. Life Sci Soc Policy. 2019 May 3;15(1):3 [PMID: 31049743]
  41. Hum Reprod Open. 2020 Nov 14;2020(4):hoaa052 [PMID: 33225079]
  42. BMC Womens Health. 2023 Jun 24;23(1):336 [PMID: 37355576]
  43. Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Jun;22(4):440-9 [PMID: 27006004]
  44. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2017 Jul;77(7):747-755 [PMID: 28729744]
  45. Fertil Steril. 2022 Mar;117(3):481-484 [PMID: 35105448]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0eggcryopreservationreasonswomensocialprocedurewellattitudestowardsliteraturemedicalfinancialfeelcountriesfertilitypaperprovidesoverviewleadconsiderknowledgeMethods:creationarticlereviewcarriedexistingsearchengineskeypointsfollows:1mainchoosedelaychildbearinglacksuitablemalepartnereducationcareeradvancementinstabilityWomensocietalfamilypressurechildreneventhoughmayready2Women'svaryopenideamanyopposedespeciallyusednon-medicalconcernssuccessrateshealthrisksethicalimplications3legalregulatoryframeworkarounddiffersacrossallowotherspermissivepoliciesissuebearcostalsodebated4needbettereducatehealthcareprovidersdeclineoptionsavailablepreservingincludingEggCryopreservationSocialReasons-ALiteratureReviewoocytefreezing

Similar Articles

Cited By