Hands-On Robotic Microsurgery: Robotic-Assisted Free Flap Reconstruction of the Upper Extremity.

Felix Struebing, Amir Khosrow Bigdeli, Arne Boecker, Jonathan Weigel, Ulrich Kneser, Emre Gazyakan
Author Information
  1. Felix Struebing: BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Heidelberg University, Ludwig-Guttmann-Stra��e 13, 67071 Ludwigshafen, Germany. ORCID
  2. Amir Khosrow Bigdeli: BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Heidelberg University, Ludwig-Guttmann-Stra��e 13, 67071 Ludwigshafen, Germany. ORCID
  3. Arne Boecker: BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Heidelberg University, Ludwig-Guttmann-Stra��e 13, 67071 Ludwigshafen, Germany. ORCID
  4. Jonathan Weigel: BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Heidelberg University, Ludwig-Guttmann-Stra��e 13, 67071 Ludwigshafen, Germany.
  5. Ulrich Kneser: BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Heidelberg University, Ludwig-Guttmann-Stra��e 13, 67071 Ludwigshafen, Germany. ORCID
  6. Emre Gazyakan: BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Heidelberg University, Ludwig-Guttmann-Stra��e 13, 67071 Ludwigshafen, Germany. ORCID

Abstract

: Robot-assisted microsurgery (RAMS) has been introduced into the field of plastic surgery in recent years. It potentially offers enhanced precision and control compared to traditional methods, which is crucial for complex microvascular tasks in free flap reconstructions. We aim to analyze our experiences with robotic-assisted microsurgery in the field of upper extremity free flap reconstruction. : This prospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the Symani Surgical System for free flap reconstructions in 16 patients with upper extremity defects at our institution from February 2023 to March 2024. Operating times were compared to a matched, historical cohort. We collected data on surgical outcomes, operative times, and complication rates, following strict adherence to the Declaration of Helsinki. : Our cohort primarily involved male patients (81%) with defects mostly located on the hand (81%). The anterolateral thigh flap was the most commonly used free flap (14/16, 88%). The average operative time was 368 �� 89 min (range: 216-550 min). No complete or partial flap losses were observed, but one flap required revision surgery due to arterial thrombosis. Major complications occurred in 13% of the cases. The average anastomosis time was 31 �� 12 min (range: 20-35 min) for arterial end-to-end anastomoses and 33 �� 13 min (range: 20-60 min) for arterial end-to-side anastomoses. Venous anastomoses required, on average, 20 �� 6 min. Operating times were not significantly longer when compared to the historical cohort ( = 0.67). : We were able to show comparable outcomes to conventional microsurgery, while requiring more time for the microsurgical anastomoses. The study highlights the need for larger, controlled trials to better understand the benefits and limitations of robotic assistance in microsurgical reconstruction of the upper extremity.

Keywords

References

  1. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Sep 06;11(9):e5240 [PMID: 37681064]
  2. JPRAS Open. 2022 Sep 10;34:126-133 [PMID: 36304073]
  3. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008 Jul;61(7):762-6 [PMID: 18468969]
  4. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Apr 29;12(4):e5775 [PMID: 38689940]
  5. Microsurgery. 2019 Jul;39(5):463-475 [PMID: 31002187]
  6. J Robot Surg. 2024 Jun 29;18(1):272 [PMID: 38951283]
  7. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2018 Oct;34(8):553-562 [PMID: 29166679]
  8. Surg Clin North Am. 2020 Apr;100(2):361-378 [PMID: 32169184]
  9. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Jan 10;10(1):e4013 [PMID: 35028251]
  10. Injury. 2014 Nov;45(11):1752-8 [PMID: 25150751]
  11. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar;23(3):1036-43 [PMID: 26467452]
  12. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2024 Apr;56(2):135-140 [PMID: 38670086]
  13. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2024 Apr;56(2):114-121 [PMID: 38670084]
  14. J Robot Surg. 2024 Apr 6;18(1):164 [PMID: 38581589]
  15. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Jul 1;152(1):239-249 [PMID: 37382921]
  16. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Mar 13;12(3):e5685 [PMID: 38948156]
  17. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015 Sep;68(9):1184-90 [PMID: 26212638]
  18. BMC Surg. 2021 Mar 29;21(1):168 [PMID: 33781250]
  19. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 May 1;151(5):1078-1082 [PMID: 36563175]
  20. J Hand Microsurg. 2021 Apr;13(2):101-108 [PMID: 33867769]
  21. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2020 Mar;36(3):213-222 [PMID: 31756733]
  22. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2023 Feb-Dec;57(1-6):240-246 [PMID: 35301916]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0flapminmicrosurgeryfree:upperextremity��anastomosescomparedreconstructiontimescohortaveragetimerange:arterialfieldsurgeryreconstructionsrobotic-assistedstudypatientsdefectsOperatinghistoricaloutcomesoperative81%requiredmicrosurgicalroboticRobot-assistedRAMSintroducedplasticrecentyearspotentiallyoffersenhancedprecisioncontroltraditionalmethodscrucialcomplexmicrovasculartasksaimanalyzeexperiencesprospectiveevaluatedefficacysafetySymaniSurgicalSystem16institutionFebruary2023March2024matchedcollecteddatasurgicalcomplicationratesfollowingstrictadherenceDeclarationHelsinkiprimarilyinvolvedmalemostlylocatedhandanterolateralthighcommonlyused14/1688%36889216-550completepartiallossesobservedonerevisionduethrombosisMajorcomplicationsoccurred13%casesanastomosis311220-35end-to-end331320-60end-to-sideVenous206significantlylonger=067ableshowcomparableconventionalrequiringhighlightsneedlargercontrolledtrialsbetterunderstandbenefitslimitationsassistanceHands-OnRoboticMicrosurgery:Robotic-AssistedFreeFlapReconstructionUpperExtremityreconstructive

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.