OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience
Advanced Search
Journal of personality
Dec 18, 2024;

Empathy to Creativity: The Associations Between Empathy and Everyday Creativity.

Bijie Tie, Wenjing Yang, Tengbin Huo, Yixin Gao, Xiongjian Yang, Dingyue Tian, Matthew Pelowski, Jiang Qiu
Author Information
  1. Bijie Tie: Center for Studies of Education and Psychology of Ethnic Minorities in Southwest China, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
  2. Wenjing Yang: Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University (SWU), Chongqing, China.
  3. Tengbin Huo: School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.
  4. Yixin Gao: Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University (SWU), Chongqing, China.
  5. Xiongjian Yang: Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University (SWU), Chongqing, China.
  6. Dingyue Tian: Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University (SWU), Chongqing, China.
  7. Matthew Pelowski: Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  8. Jiang Qiu: Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University (SWU), Chongqing, China. ORCID
PMID: 39691954 DOI: 10.1111/jopy.13002

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Everyday creativity is fundamental to human existence and improved well-being. Beyond recent attention regarding how contextual, lifestyle, personality, and neurobiological differences might foster everyday creativity, empathy may also constitute an intriguing connection. However, this potential relationship has not yet been systematically assessed.
METHODS: Study 1 used multiple psychometric instruments to examine the levels of emotional and cognitive empathies and everyday creativity among different samples (n���=���809). Study 2 used a cross-lagged panel model (CLPM) to examine longitudinal behavioral data (n���=���653 at T1, n���=���413 at T2) to determine how cognitive empathy might predict everyday creativity.
RESULTS: Study 1 found that cognitive but not affective empathy exhibited a significant positive correlation with everyday creativity and domain-specific creative behaviors. Study 2 also reported a positive correlation between cognitive empathy, overall creative achievement, and certain domain-specific creative achievements. Cognitive empathy was linked to greater involvement in everyday creativity.
CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, these studies are the first to demonstrate a robust relationship between cognitive empathy and everyday creativity across different samples, measures, and longitudinal data, providing evidence of a nuanced relationship between cognitive empathy and creative achievement. Future studies should explore how creativity or empathy may foster empathic/creative development.

Keywords

cognitive empathy emotional empathy empathy everyday creativity longitudinal study

References

  1. Baas, M., C. K. De Dreu, and B. A. Nijstad. 2008. ���A Meta���Analysis of 25���Years of Mood���Creativity Research: Hedonic Tone, Activation, or Regulatory Focus?��� Psychological Bulletin 134, no. 6: 779���806. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012815.
  2. Baer, J., and J. C. Kaufman. 2005. ���Bridging generality and specificity: The amusement park theoretical (apt) model of creativity.��� Roeper Review 27, no. 3: 158���163. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190509554310.
  3. Baldner, C., and J. J. McGinley. 2014. ���Correlational and Exploratory Factor Analyses (Efa) of Commonly Used Empathy Questionnaires: New Insights.��� Motivation and Emotion 38, no. 5: 727���744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031���014���9417���2.
  4. Baron���Cohen, S., R. Cabello, P. Fern��ndez���Berrocal, M. J. Guti��rrez���Cobo, R. G��mez���Leal, and A. Meg��as���Robles. 2023. ���Does Our Cognitive Empathy Diminish With Age? The Moderator Role of Educational Level.��� International Psychogeriatrics 35, no. 4: 207���214. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610221000624.
  5. Barrett, M. S., A. Creech, and K. Zhukov. 2021. ���Creative Collaboration and Collaborative Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review.��� Frontiers in Psychology 12: 713445. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713445.
  6. Batey, M. D. 2007. A Psychometric Investigation of Everyday Creativity. University College London (United Kingdom): University of London.
  7. Beghetto, R. A., and J. C. Kaufman. 2007. ���Toward a Broader Conception of Creativity: A Case for ���Mini���c��� Creativity.��� Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 1, no. 2: 73���79. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931���3896.1.2.73.
  8. Benedek, M., R. Bruckdorfer, and E. Jauk. 2019. ���Motives for Creativity: Exploring the What and Why of Everyday Creativity.��� Journal of Creative Behavior 54, no. 3: 610���625. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.396.
  9. Benedek, M., E. Jauk, M. Sommer, M. Arendasy, and A. C. Neubauer. 2014. ���Intelligence, Creativity, and Cognitive Control: The Common and Differential Involvement of Executive Functions in Intelligence and Creativity.��� Intelligence 46: 73���83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.007.
  10. Brosowsky, N. P., N. Barr, J. Mugon, A. A. Scholer, P. Seli, and J. Danckert. 2022. ���Creativity, Boredom Proneness and Well���Being in the Pandemic.��� Behavioral Sciences 12, no. 3: 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12030068.
  11. Carson, S. H., J. B. Peterson, and D. M. Higgins. 2005. ���Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure of the Creative Achievement Questionnaire.��� Creativity Research Journal 17, no. 1���2: 37���50. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1701_4.
  12. Casas, F., J. C. Sarriera, D. Abs, et al. 2012. ���Subjective Indicators of Personal Well���Being Among Adolescents. Performance and Results for Different Scales in Latin���Language Speaking Countries: A Contribution to the International Debate.��� Child Indicators Research 5, no. 1: 1���28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187���011���9119���1.
  13. Chen, Q., R. E. Beaty, Z. Cui, et al. 2019. ���Brain Hemispheric Involvement in Visuospatial and Verbal Divergent Thinking.��� NeuroImage 202: 116065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116065.
  14. Chen, Q., R. E. Beaty, and J. Qiu. 2020. ���Mapping the Artistic Brain: Common and Distinct Neural Activations Associated With Musical, Drawing, and Literary Creativity.��� Human Brain Mapping 41, no. 12: 3403���3419. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25025.
  15. Chen, Q., R. E. Beaty, D. Wei, et al. 2018. ���Longitudinal Alterations of Frontoparietal and Frontotemporal Networks Predict Future Creative Cognitive Ability.��� Cerebral Cortex 28, no. 1: 103���115. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw353.
  16. Conner, T. S., and P. J. Silvia. 2015. ���Creative Days: A Daily Diary Study of Emotion, Personality, and Everyday Creativity.��� Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 9, no. 4: 463���470. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000022.
  17. Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1998. ���Implications of a Systems Perspective for the Study of Creativity.��� In Handbook of Creativity, edited by R. J. Sternberg, 313���336. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511807916.018.
  18. Cuff, B. M. P., S. J. Brown, L. Taylor, and D. J. Howat. 2014. ���Empathy: A Review of the Concept.��� Emotion Review 8, no. 2: 144���153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914558466.
  19. Davis, M. H. 1983. ���Measuring Individual Differences in Empathy: Evidence for a Multidimensional Approach.��� Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44, no. 1: 113���126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022���3514.44.1.113.
  20. Davis, M. H. 2006. ���Empathy.��� In Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions, edited by J. E. Stets and J. H. Turner, 443���466. New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978���0���387���30715���2_20.
  21. De Dreu, C. K., B. A. Nijstad, and M. Baas. 2024. ���Human Creativity: Functions, Mechanisms, and Social Conditioning.��� In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 69, 203���262. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  22. de Waal, F. B. M., and S. D. Preston. 2017. ���Mammalian Empathy: Behavioural Manifestations and Neural Basis.��� Nature Reviews Neuroscience 18, no. 8: 498���509. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2017.72.
  23. Decety, J., and K. J. Yoder. 2016. ���Empathy and Motivation for Justice: Cognitive Empathy and Concern, but Not Emotional Empathy, Predict Sensitivity to Injustice for Others.��� Social Neuroscience 11, no. 1: 1���14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2015.1029593.
  24. Del Barrio, V., A. Aluja, and L. F. Garc��a. 2004. ���Relationship Between Empathy and the Big Five Personality Traits in a Sample of Spanish Adolescents.��� Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 32, no. 7: 677���681. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2004.32.7.677.
  25. Diedrich, J., E. Jauk, P. J. Silvia, J. M. Gredlein, A. C. Neubauer, and M. Benedek. 2018. ���Assessment of Real���Life Creativity: The Inventory of Creative Activities and Achievements (Icaa).��� Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 12, no. 3: 304���316. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000137.
  26. Dost��l, D., A. Plh��kov��, and T. Z����kodn��. 2017. ���Domain���Specific Creativity in Relation to the Level of Empathy and Systemizing.��� Journal of Creative Behavior 51, no. 3: 225���239. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.103.
  27. Edwards, B. 1987. Drawing on the Artist Within: A Guide to Innovation, Invention, Imagination, and Creativity. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
  28. Eres, R., J. Decety, W. R. Louis, and P. Molenberghs. 2015. ���Individual Differences in Local Gray Matter Density Are Associated With Differences in Affective and Cognitive Empathy.��� NeuroImage 117: 305���310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.038.
  29. Faravelli, C., G. Albanesi, and E. Poli. 1986. ���Assessment of Depression: A Comparison of Rating Scales.��� Journal of Affective Disorders 11, no. 3: 245���253. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165���0327(86)90076���5.
  30. Fernandez Rivas, D., and S. Husein. 2022. ���Empathy, Persuasiveness and Knowledge Promote Innovative Engineering and Entrepreneurial Skills.��� Education for Chemical Engineers 40: 45���55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2022.05.002.
  31. Finke, R. A., T. B. Ward, and S. M. Smith. 1996. Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  32. Forgeard, M. 2024. ���Prosocial Motivation and Creativity in the Arts and Sciences: Qualitative and Quantitative Evidence.��� Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 18, no. 2: 222���244. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000435.
  33. Form, S., and C. Kaernbach. 2018. ���More Is Not Always Better: The Differentiated Influence of Empathy on Different Magnitudes of Creativity.��� Europe's Journal of Psychology 14, no. 1: 54���65. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v14i1.1432.
  34. Frith, C., and U. Frith. 2005. ���Theory of Mind.��� Theory of Mind. Current Biology 15, no. 17: R644���R645.
  35. F��rst, G., and F. Grin. 2018. ���A Comprehensive Method for the Measurement of Everyday Creativity.��� Thinking Skills and Creativity 28: 84���97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.03.007.
  36. Gasparini, A. 2015. Perspective and use of empathy in design thinking. ACHI, the eight international conference on advances in computer���human interactions.
  37. Gerdes, K. E., E. A. Segal, K. F. Jackson, and J. L. Mullins. 2011. ���Teaching Empathy: A Framework Rooted in Social Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Justice.��� Journal of Social Work Education 47, no. 1: 109���131. https://doi.org/10.5175/jswe.2011.200900085.
  38. Gerry, L. J. 2017. ���Paint With Me: Stimulating Creativity and Empathy While Painting With a Painter in Virtual Reality.��� EEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, no. 4: 1418���1426. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2657239.
  39. Gerson, M. W., and L. Neilson. 2014. ���The Importance of Identity Development, Principled Moral Reasoning, and Empathy as Predictors of Openness to Diversity in Emerging Adults.��� SAGE Open 4, no. 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014553584.
  40. Glaveanu, V., T. Lubart, N. Bonnardel, et al. 2013. ���Creativity as Action: Findings From Five Creative Domains.��� Frontiers in Psychology 4: 40417. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00176.
  41. Hall, J. A., and R. Schwartz. 2019. ���Empathy Present and Future.��� Journal of Social Psychology 159, no. 3: 225���243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1477442.
  42. He, R., K. Zhuang, L. Liu, et al. 2022. ���The Impact of Knowledge on Poetry Composition: An fMRI Investigation.��� Brain and Language 235: 105202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2022.105202.
  43. Hirsh, J. B., C. G. DeYoung, X. Xu, and J. B. Peterson. 2010. ���Compassionate Liberals and Polite Conservatives: Associations of Agreeableness With Political Ideology and Moral Values.��� Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36, no. 5: 655���664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210366854.
  44. Huo, T., S. Shamay���Tsoory, and S. Han. 2023. ���Creative Mindset Reduces Racial Ingroup Bias in Empathic Neural Responses.��� Cerebral Cortex 33, no. 20: 10558���10574. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhad303.
  45. Ilha Villanova, A. L., and Pina e Cunha, M. 2020. ���Everyday Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review.��� Journal of Creative Behavior 55, no. 3: 673���695. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.481.
  46. Kardos, P., B. Leidner, C. Pl��h, P. Solt��sz, and Z. Unoka. 2017. ���Empathic People Have More Friends: Empathic Abilities Predict Social Network Size and Position in Social Network Predicts Empathic Efforts.��� Social Networks 50: 1���5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.01.004.
  47. Kaufman, J. C. 2018. ���Finding Meaning With Creativity in the Past, Present, and Future.��� Perspectives on Psychological Science 13, no. 6: 734���749. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618771981.
  48. Kaufman, J. C., and R. A. Beghetto. 2009. ���Beyond Big and Little: The Four c Model of Creativity.��� Review of General Psychology 13, no. 1: 1���12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688.
  49. Kaufman, J. C., and R. J. Sternberg. 2019. The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.
  50. Kenny, D. A. 1975. ���Cross���Lagged Panel Correlation: A Test for Spuriousness.��� Psychological Bulletin 82, no. 6: 887���903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033���2909.82.6.887.
  51. Kuh, G. D., T. M. Cruce, R. Shoup, J. Kinzie, and R. M. Gonyea 2008. ���Unmasking the Effects of Student Engagement on First���Year College Grades and Persistence.��� Journal of Higher Education 79, no. 5: 540���563. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0019.
  52. K��ppen, E., and C. Meinel. 2015. ���Empathy via Design Thinking: Creation of Sense and Knowledge.��� In Design Thinking Research, edited by H. Plattner, C. Meinel, and L. Leifer, 15���28. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978���3���319���06823���7_2.
  53. Lawn, E. C. R., S. M. Laham, K. Zhao, A. P. Christensen, L. D. Smillie, and B. Donnellan. 2023. ���Where the Head Meets the Heart: ���Enlightened��� Compassion Lies Between Big Five Openness/Intellect and Agreeableness. Collabra.��� Psychology 9, no. 1: 74468. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.74468.
  54. Lebedeva, N., S. H. Schwartz, F. J. R. Van De Vijver, J. Plucker, and E. Bushina. 2018. ���Domains of Everyday Creativity and Personal Values.��� Frontiers in Psychology 9: 2681. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02681.
  55. Liang, Y. S., H. X. Yang, Y. T. Ma, et al. 2019. ���Validation and Extension of the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy in the Chinese Setting.��� PsyCh Journal 8, no. 4: 439���448. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.281.
  56. Liu, W., D. Wei, Q. Chen, et al. 2017. ���Longitudinal Test���Retest Neuroimaging Data From Healthy Young Adults in Southwest China.��� Scientific Data 4: 170017. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.17.
  57. Main, A., E. A. Walle, C. Kho, and J. Halpern. 2017. ���The Interpersonal Functions of Empathy: A Relational Perspective.��� Emotion Review 9, no. 4: 358���366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916669440.
  58. Mairon, N., L. Abramson, A. Knafo���Noam, A. Perry, and M. Nahum. 2023. ���The Relationship Between Empathy and Executive Functions Among Young Adolescents.��� Developmental Psychology 59, no. 11: 2021���2036. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001639.
  59. Melchers, M., C. Montag, S. Markett, and M. Reuter. 2015. ���Assessment of Empathy via Self���Report and Behavioural Paradigms: Data on Convergent and Discriminant Validity.��� Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 20, no. 2: 157���171. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2014.991781.
  60. Morelli, S. A., M. D. Lieberman, and J. Zaki. 2015. ���The Emerging Study of Positive Empathy.��� Social and Personality Psychology Compass 9, no. 2: 57���68. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12157.
  61. Morelli, S. A., D. C. Ong, R. Makati, M. O. Jackson, and J. Zaki. 2017. ���Empathy and Well���Being Correlate With Centrality in Different Social Networks.��� Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114, no. 37: 9843���9847. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702155114.
  62. Nair, T. K., S. M. Waslin, G. A. Rodrigues, S. Datta, M. T. Moore, and L. E. Brumariu. 2024. ���A Meta���Analytic Review of the Relations Between Anxiety and Empathy.��� Journal of Anxiety Disorders 101: 102795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102795.
  63. Nijstad, B. A., W. Stroebe, and H. F. M. Lodewijkx. 2002. ���Cognitive Stimulation and Interference in Groups: Exposure Effects in an Idea Generation Task.��� Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 38, no. 6: 535���544. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022���1031(02)00500���0.
  64. Nummenmaa, L., J. Hirvonen, R. Parkkola, and J. K. Hietanen. 2008. ���Is Emotional Contagion Special? An Fmri Study on Neural Systems for Affective and Cognitive Empathy.��� NeuroImage 43, no. 3: 571���580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.014.
  65. Oliveira Silva, P., L. Maia, J. Coutinho, et al. 2018. ���Empathy by Default: Correlates in the Brain at Rest.��� Psicothema 30, no. 1: 97���103. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.366.
  66. ��zt��rk, B. 2024. ���Art of Food: Systematic Literature Review of Culinary Creativity.��� International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science 36: 100940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgfs.2024.100940.
  67. Ovando���Tellez, M., Y. N. Kenett, M. Benedek, et al. 2022. ���Brain Connectivity���Based Prediction of Real���Life Creativity Is Mediated by Semantic Memory Structure.��� Science Advances 8, no. 5: eabl4294. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abl4294.
  68. Pan, X., and H. Yu. 2016. ���Different Effects of Cognitive Shifting and Intelligence on Creativity.��� Journal of Creative Behavior 52, no. 3: 212���225. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.144.
  69. Pavlovich, K., and K. Krahnke. 2011. ���Empathy, Connectedness and Organisation.��� Journal of Business Ethics 105, no. 1: 131���137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551���011���0961���3.
  70. Pei, Y., J. Han, J. Zhao, M. Liu, and W. Pang. 2022. ���The Effects of the creator's Situation on Creativity Evaluation: The rater's Cognitive Empathy and Affective Empathy Matter in Rating Creative Works.��� Journal of Intelligence 10, no. 4: 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10040075.
  71. Pelowski, M., E. Specker, J. Boddy, et al. 2023. ���Together in the Dark?: Investigating the Understanding and Feeling of Intended Emotions Between Viewers and Professional Artists at the Venice Biennale.��� Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 17, no. 6: 772���792. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000436.
  72. Preston, S. D., and F. B. M. de Waal. 2003. ���Empathy: Its Ultimate and Proximate Bases.��� Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25, no. 1: 1���20. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x02000018.
  73. Raykov, T. 2004. ���Behavioral Scale Reliability and Measurement Invariance Evaluation Using Latent Variable Modeling.��� Behavior Therapy 35, no. 2: 299���331. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005���7894(04)80041���8.
  74. Reniers, R. L., R. Corcoran, R. Drake, N. M. Shryane, and B. A. Vollm. 2011. ���The Qcae: A Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy.��� Journal of Personality Assessment 93, no. 1: 84���95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.528484.
  75. Richards, R. 2010. ���Everyday Creativity.��� In The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, edited by J. C. Kaufman and R. J. Sternberg, 189���215. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511763205.013.
  76. Rietzschel, E. F., H. Zacher, and W. Stroebe. 2016. ���A Lifespan Perspective on Creativity and Innovation at Work.��� Work, Aging and Retirement 2, no. 2: 105���129. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waw005.
  77. Shamay���Tsoory, S. G., J. Aharon���Peretz, and D. Perry. 2009. ���Two Systems for Empathy: A Double Dissociation Between Emotional and Cognitive Empathy in Inferior Frontal Gyrus Versus Ventromedial Prefrontal Lesions.��� Brain 132: 617���627. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awn279.
  78. Silvia, P. J., K. N. Cotter, and A. P. Christensen. 2017. ���The Creative Self in Context: Experience Sampling and the Ecology of Everyday Creativity.��� In The Creative Self, edited by M. Karwowski and J. C. Kaufman, 275���288. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978���0���12���809790���8.00015���7.
  79. Silvia, P. J., B. Wigert, R. Reiter���Palmon, and J. C. Kaufman. 2012. ���Assessing Creativity With Self���Report Scales: A Review and Empirical Evaluation.��� Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 6, no. 1: 19���34. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024071.
  80. Smith, A. 2006. ���Cognitive Empathy and Emotional Empathy in Human Behavior and Evolution.��� Psychological Record 56, no. 1: 3���21. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03395534.
  81. Stephan, C. 2023. ���The Passive Dimension of Empathy and Its Relevance for Design.��� Design Studies 86: 101179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2023.101179.
  82. Suleiman, S. R., and I. Crosman. 2014. The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation. Vol. 617. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  83. Sundararajan, L., and J. R. Averill. 2007. Creativity in the Everyday: Culture, Self, and Emotions.
  84. Theurer, C., W. Rogh, and N. Berner. 2021. ���Interdependencies Between Openness and Creativity of Fifth Graders.��� Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 15, no. 3: 391���400. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000299.
  85. Van Lissa, C. J., S. T. Hawk, and W. H. J. Meeus. 2017. ���The Effects of Affective and Cognitive Empathy on adolescents' Behavior and Outcomes in Conflicts With Mothers.��� Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 158: 32���45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.01.002.
  86. Vassallo, J. P., S. Banerjee, H. Zaman, and J. C. Prabhu. 2023. ���Design Thinking and Public Sector Innovation: The Divergent Effects of Risk���Taking, Cognitive Empathy and Emotional Empathy on Individual Performance.��� Research Policy 52, no. 6: 104768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104768.
  87. Walter, H. 2012. ���Social cognitive neuroscience of empathy: Concepts, circuits, and genes.��� Emotion Review 4, no. 1: 9���17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911421379.
  88. Walther, J., S. E. Miller, and N. W. Sochacka. 2017. ���A Model of Empathy in Engineering as a Core Skill, Practice Orientation, and Professional Way of Being.��� Journal of Engineering Education 106, no. 1: 123���148. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20159.
  89. Webster, D. 2010. ���Promoting Empathy Through a Creative Reflective Teaching Strategy: A Mixed���Method Study.��� Journal of Engineering Education 49, no. 2: 87���94. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834���20090918���09.
  90. Weisz, E., and M. Cikara. 2021. ���Strategic Regulation of Empathy.��� Trends in Cognitive Sciences 25, no. 3: 213���227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.12.002.
  91. Winters, D. E., P. J. Pruitt, S. Fukui, et al. 2021. ���Network Functional Connectivity Underlying Dissociable Cognitive and Affective Components of Empathy in Adolescence.��� Neuropsychologia 156: 107832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107832.
  92. Wolf, O. T., J. M. Schulte, H. Drimalla, T. C. Hamacher���Dang, D. Knoch, and I. Dziobek. 2015. ���Enhanced Emotional Empathy After Psychosocial Stress in Young Healthy Men.��� Stress 18, no. 6: 631���637. https://doi.org/10.3109/10253890.2015.1078787.
  93. Yang, Z., and I. W. Hung. 2021. ���Creative Thinking Facilitates Perspective Taking.��� Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 120, no. 2: 278���299. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000259.
  94. Yaniv, D. 2012. ���Dynamics of Creativity and Empathy in Role Reversal: Contributions From Neuroscience.��� Review of General Psychology 16, no. 1: 70���77. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026580.
  95. Yeung, W. L., and O. L. Ng. 2024. ���Using Empathy Maps to Support Design���Thinking Enhanced Transdisciplinary Stem Innovation in k���12 Setting.��� International Journal of Technology and Design Education 34, no. 4: 1325���1350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798���023���09861���7.
  96. Yoon, J., T. J. Jo, and S. J. Kang. 2020. ���A Study on the Possibility of the Relationship Among Group Creativity, Empathy, and Scientific Inquiry Ability of Elementary School Students.��� International Journal of Science Education 42, no. 13: 2113���2125. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1813347.
  97. Zabelina, D. L., N. P. Friedman, and J. Andrews���Hanna. 2019. ���Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions in Creativity.��� Consciousness and Cognition 68: 47���56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.12.005.
  98. Zhang, J. W., R. T. Howell, P. Razavi, et al. 2024. ���Awe Is Associated With Creative Personality, Convergent Creativity, and Everyday Creativity.��� Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 18, no. 2: 209���221. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000442.
  99. Zhang, X. R., L. F. Cheng, D. Y. Dai, W. S. Tong, and W. P. Hu. 2020. ���Adolescents With Different Profiles of Scientific Versus Artistic Creativity: Similarity and Difference in Cognitive Control.��� Thinking Skills and Creativity 37: 100688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100688.
Journal Article
Article has an altmetric score of 9

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0empathycreativityeverydaycognitiveStudycreativerelationshiplongitudinalEverydaymightfostermayalso1usedexamineemotionaldifferentsamples2datapositivecorrelationdomain-specificachievementstudiesEmpathyOBJECTIVE:fundamentalhumanexistenceimprovedwell-beingBeyondrecentattentionregardingcontextuallifestylepersonalityneurobiologicaldifferencesconstituteintriguingconnectionHoweverpotentialyetsystematicallyassessedMETHODS:multiplepsychometricinstrumentslevelsempathiesamongn���=���809cross-laggedpanelmodelCLPMbehavioraln���=���653T1n���=���413T2determinepredictRESULTS:foundaffectiveexhibitedsignificantbehaviorsreportedoverallcertainachievementsCognitivelinkedgreaterinvolvementCONCLUSION:knowledgefirstdemonstraterobustacrossmeasuresprovidingevidencenuancedFutureexploreempathic/creativedevelopmentCreativity:AssociationsCreativitystudy

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.