Prevalence and associations of problematic smartphone use with smartphone activities, psychological well-being, and sleep quality in a household survey of Singapore adults.

Rebecca Hui Shan Ong, Hui Shan Sim, Manfred Max Bergman, Choon How How, Constance Ai Li Png, Chau Sian Lim, Lai Huat Peh, Hong Choon Oh
Author Information
  1. Rebecca Hui Shan Ong: Health Services Research, Changi General Hospital, SingHealth, Singapore, Singapore. ORCID
  2. Hui Shan Sim: Care and Health Integration Department, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  3. Manfred Max Bergman: Department of Social Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  4. Choon How How: Family Medicine, Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS, Singapore, Singapore.
  5. Constance Ai Li Png: Clinical Psychology Department, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  6. Chau Sian Lim: Psychological Medicine Department, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  7. Lai Huat Peh: Psychological Medicine Department, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  8. Hong Choon Oh: Health Services Research, Changi General Hospital, SingHealth, Singapore, Singapore.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Despite the many benefits of smartphones, researchers have raised concerns over problematic smartphone use (PSU) and its negative effects on physical and psychological well-being. Studies examining PSU and its impact among adults remain limited. Hence, we aim to examine the prevalence of PSU among adults in Singapore, and explore its associations with smartphone activities, sleep quality, and psychological well-being, as well as age and gender-related differences in these associations.
METHODS: A household survey (n = 1200) was conducted among multi-ethnic Singapore adults aged 21 to 60. The survey employed a proportionate stratified random sampling approach. The Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short Version was used to determine risk of PSU. Adjusted multivariable logistic regressions, age-stratified (21-30, and above 30) analyses and sensitivity analyses were performed.
RESULTS: The survey response rate was 45.7%. PSU prevalence rate was estimated to be 34.0%. Adults at risk were younger (OR = 3.72, p < 0.001), had poor sleep quality (OR = 2.94), reported depressive (OR = 2.84, p = 0.001) or anxiety symptoms (OR = 2.44, p < 0.001), tend to use smartphones for social media (OR = 2.81, p = 0.002) or entertainment (OR = 2.72, p < 0.001). Protective factors include higher levels of social support (OR = 0.76, p = 0.007), using smartphones for calling family (OR = 0.39, p = 0.003) and friends (OR = 0.53, p = 0.030), and spending four hours or less of smartphone usage duration (OR = 0.40, p < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses confirmed these findings. Associations between PSU and poor sleep quality (OR = 3.72, p < 0.001), depressive (OR = 3.83, p < 0.001), and anxiety symptoms (OR = 2.59, p = 0.004) and social media usage (OR = 3.46, p < 0.001) were more pronounced in adults over 30. PSU was more prevalent among females in those aged 21-30 (OR = 2.60, p = 0.022). Social support appears to be a protective factor for adults over 30 (OR = 0.64, p < 0.001) but was not observed in those aged 21-30. Among males, younger age (21-30 years), poor sleep quality, depressive symptoms, and anxiety symptoms, and using social media and entertainment apps were significantly associated with PSU. Females showed similar associations. Social support appears to be a protective factor for females (OR = 0.70, p = 0.018), but this association was not observed for males. Shorter smartphone usage times were inversely associated with PSU in both genders.
CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of adults exhibited PSU. Findings highlight the differential associations between PSU and psychological well-being, social support, interactions with technology, and sleep quality. These associations are influenced by age which has implications for preventive efforts.

References

  1. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7 [PMID: 16717171]
  2. Nurs Rep. 2023 Feb 24;13(1):337-350 [PMID: 36976684]
  3. BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 13;23(1):36 [PMID: 36639669]
  4. BMC Public Health. 2011 Jan 31;11:66 [PMID: 21281471]
  5. BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Nov 17;16(1):408 [PMID: 27855666]
  6. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Nov;108(11):1059-62 [PMID: 11102297]
  7. Sleep Biol Rhythms. 2006 Jun;4(2):129-139 [PMID: 22822303]
  8. Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Oct 13;13(10): [PMID: 37887489]
  9. BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 10;21(1):449 [PMID: 34507561]
  10. BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Oct 10;17(1):341 [PMID: 29017482]
  11. BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 29;19(1):356 [PMID: 31779637]
  12. Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 20;10:986498 [PMID: 36203674]
  13. Addict Behav. 2023 Sep;144:107715 [PMID: 37059002]
  14. J Behav Addict. 2018 Jun 1;7(2):252-259 [PMID: 29895183]
  15. J Behav Addict. 2019 Jun 1;8(2):335-342 [PMID: 31257917]
  16. J Behav Addict. 2022 Jun 30;11(2):577-587 [PMID: 35895472]
  17. Addict Behav Rep. 2017 Jul 19;6:90-95 [PMID: 29450241]
  18. J Behav Addict. 2020 Oct 03;9(3):534-550 [PMID: 33011714]
  19. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213 [PMID: 2748771]
  20. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2011 Aug;15(3):219-66 [PMID: 20716644]
  21. J Affect Disord. 2015 Nov 15;187:218-23 [PMID: 26342917]
  22. Front Psychiatry. 2016 Oct 24;7:175 [PMID: 27822187]
  23. Addict Behav. 2023 Feb;137:107503 [PMID: 36228362]
  24. J Ration Emot Cogn Behav Ther. 2022 Oct 10;:1-19 [PMID: 36247047]
  25. J Behav Addict. 2015 Jun;4(2):85-92 [PMID: 26132913]
  26. PLoS One. 2016 Nov 15;11(11):e0163010 [PMID: 27846211]
  27. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 29;17(3): [PMID: 32013111]
  28. Health Soc Care Community. 2021 Sep;29(5):e89-e96 [PMID: 33278311]
  29. PLoS One. 2013 Dec 31;8(12):e83558 [PMID: 24391787]
  30. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 22;18(22): [PMID: 34832011]
  31. Addict Behav. 2023 Aug;143:107708 [PMID: 37001259]
  32. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Mar;10(2):238-49 [PMID: 25866548]
  33. PLoS One. 2017 Aug 23;12(8):e0182145 [PMID: 28832594]
  34. PLoS One. 2016 Nov 9;11(11):e0165331 [PMID: 27829040]
  35. J Sleep Res. 2023 Apr;32(2):e13727 [PMID: 36114149]
  36. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2012 Feb;41(2):49-66 [PMID: 22498852]
  37. Addict Behav. 2017 Jan;64:275-280 [PMID: 26685805]
  38. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95 [PMID: 12900694]
  39. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2236676 [PMID: 36251294]
  40. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010 Jul-Aug;32(4):345-59 [PMID: 20633738]
  41. Neuropsychiatr. 2019 Dec;33(4):179-190 [PMID: 31493233]
  42. Front Psychol. 2020 May 05;11:672 [PMID: 32431636]
  43. Int J Equity Health. 2012 Aug 16;11:44 [PMID: 22894180]
  44. J Behav Addict. 2014 Dec;3(4):254-65 [PMID: 25595966]
  45. J Affect Disord. 2020 Sep 1;274:576-582 [PMID: 32663990]
  46. Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 04;12:794112 [PMID: 35185692]
  47. AJS. 1965 May;70:710-7 [PMID: 14298073]
  48. J Behav Addict. 2022 Jun 10;11(2):290-304 [PMID: 35895565]
  49. J Pers Assess. 1990 Winter;55(3-4):610-7 [PMID: 2280326]
  50. Addict Behav. 2020 Dec;111:106552 [PMID: 32717501]
  51. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014 Feb;17(2):91-8 [PMID: 23981147]
  52. J Behav Addict. 2018 Dec 1;7(4):1157-1165 [PMID: 30418073]
  53. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13 [PMID: 11556941]
  54. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2020 Apr;23(4):199-209 [PMID: 32096662]
  55. PLoS One. 2017 Aug 3;12(8):e0181184 [PMID: 28771626]

MeSH Term

Humans
Adult
Singapore
Male
Female
Middle Aged
Smartphone
Prevalence
Sleep Quality
Young Adult
Surveys and Questionnaires
Anxiety
Internet Addiction Disorder
Psychological Well-Being

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0=0ORpPSU001<adults2smartphoneassociationssleepqualitysocialpsychologicalwell-beingamongsurvey21-303symptomssupportsmartphonesuseSingaporeageaged30analyses72poordepressiveanxietymediausageproblematicprevalenceactivitieshousehold60riskrateyoungerentertainmentusingfemalesSocialappearsprotectivefactorobservedmalesassociatedINTRODUCTION:DespitemanybenefitsresearchersraisedconcernsnegativeeffectsphysicalStudiesexaminingimpactremainlimitedHenceaimexamineexplorewellgender-relateddifferencesMETHODS:n1200conductedmulti-ethnic21employedproportionatestratifiedrandomsamplingapproachSmartphoneAddictionScale-ShortVersionuseddetermineAdjustedmultivariablelogisticregressionsage-stratifiedsensitivityperformedRESULTS:response457%estimated340%Adults94reported8444tend81002Protectivefactorsincludehigherlevels76007callingfamily39003friends53030spendingfourhourslessduration40SensitivityconfirmedfindingsAssociations835900446pronouncedprevalent02264AmongyearsappssignificantlyFemalesshowedsimilar70018associationShortertimesinverselygendersCONCLUSION:substantialproportionexhibitedFindingshighlightdifferentialinteractionstechnologyinfluencedimplicationspreventiveeffortsPrevalence

Similar Articles

Cited By