OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience
Advanced Search
International journal of behavioral medicine
Dec 18, 2024;

Conscious Initiation to Promote Physical Activity: A Behavioral Experiment and A Randomized Controlled Trial Intervention.

Cong Zhang, Qianqian Ju, Yiqun Gan
Author Information
  1. Cong Zhang: School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
  2. Qianqian Ju: School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
  3. Yiqun Gan: School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China. ygan@pku.edu.cn. ORCID
PMID: 39695052 DOI: 10.1007/s12529-024-10342-x

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have investigated the encouragement of healthy behaviors through both conscious manipulation and unconscious priming. However, direct comparisons between these two approaches are limited, resulting in interventions that may lack precision. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of conscious and unconscious priming on the intention to engage in physical activity, with the goal of identifying and applying the most effective method as a targeted intervention to bridge the gap between intention and actual physical activity.
METHOD: In study 1, 116 participants were screened in a 2 × 2 (conscious vs. unconscious) × (prime vs. control) online experiment to examine the influence of implementation intention manipulation and goal priming on physical activity. Building on these results, study 2 employed a randomized controlled trial with 127 participants to assess the effects of conscious mental simulation interventions on physical activity behavior.
RESULTS: Study 1 showed that both conscious manipulation (p = .046) and unconscious priming (p = .004) significantly increased the choice of sports activities, with conscious manipulation being more effective. Study 2 found significant impacts of mixed simulation on activity levels immediately and one-week post-intervention (p = .001), with day-after intervention effects notable in the simulation group.
CONCLUSIONS: This study explored the causal relationship between priming process physical activity, and found out the promotion effect of conscious mental simulation intervention on physical activity.

Keywords

Conscious priming Intervention Mental stimulation Physical activity

References

  1. World Health Organization. "Physical activity." https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/physical-activity . Accessed June 26, 2024.
  2. Chodzko-Zajko WJ, et al (2009) American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Exercise and physical activity for older adults. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2009. 41(7): p. 1510–1530.
  3. Landi F, et al. Moving against frailty: does physical activity matter? Biogerontology (Dordrecht). 2010;11(5):537–45. [DOI: 10.1007/s10522-010-9296-1]
  4. Gronchi G, Giovannelli F. Dual process theory of thought and default mode network: A possible neural foundation of fast thinking. Front Psychol. 2018;9:1237–1237. [PMID: 30065692]
  5. Strain T, et al. Use of the prevented fraction for the population to determine deaths averted by existing prevalence of physical activity: a descriptive study. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(7):e920–30. [PMID: 32562648]
  6. Wen CP, Wu X. Stressing harms of physical inactivity to promote exercise. Lancet (British edition). 2012;380(9838):192–3.
  7. Stanovich KE, Who is rational?: Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 1999.
  8. Strack F, Deutsch R. Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004;8(3):220–47. [PMID: 15454347]
  9. Wilhelm Hofmann, MFRWW, Impulsive versus reflective influences on health behavior: a theoretical framework and empirical review. Health Psychology Review, 2008.
  10. Marteau TM, Hollands GJ, Kelly MP (2015) Changing population behavior and reducing health disparities: exploring the potential of “choice architecture” interventions. Emerging Behavioral and Social Science Perspectives on Population Health, 2015.
  11. Hagger MS, et al. Implementation intention and planning interventions in Health Psychology: Recommendations from the Synergy Expert Group for research and practice. Psychol Health. 2016;31(7):814–39. [PMID: 26892502]
  12. Toli A, Webb TL, Hardy GE. Does forming implementation intentions help people with mental health problems to achieve goals? A meta-analysis of experimental studies with clinical and analogue samples. Br J Clin Psychol. 2016;55(1):69–90. [PMID: 25965276]
  13. Carrera M, et al. The limits of simple implementation intentions: evidence from a field experiment on making plans to exercise. J Health Econ. 2018;62:95–104. [PMID: 30336306]
  14. Papies EK and Barsalou LW (2015) Grounding desire and motivated behavior: a theoretical framework and review of empirical evidence. In The psychology of desire, 2015(pp. 36–60).
  15. Sheeran P, et al. Activation versus change as a principle underlying intervention strategies to promote health behaviors. Ann Behav Med. 2023;57(3):205–15. [PMID: 36082928]
  16. Wryobeck J, Chen Y. Using priming techniques to facilitate health behaviours. Clinic Psychol (Australian Psychol Soc). 2003;7(2):105–8.
  17. Brunner TA. How weight-related cues affect food intake in a modeling situation. Appetite. 2010;55(3):507–11. [PMID: 20832440]
  18. Brunner TA, Siegrist M. Reduced food intake after exposure to subtle weight-related cues. Appetite. 2012;58(3):1109–12. [PMID: 22425649]
  19. Geng X, et al (2018) Healthy goal initiation reduces high-calorie food consumption. Acta Psychologica Sinica 2018((08), 840–847).
  20. Duffy KA, Green PA, Chartrand TL. Mimicry and modeling of health(-risk) behaviors: how others impact our health(-risk) behaviors without our awareness. J Nonverbal Behav. 2020;44(1):5–40. [DOI: 10.1007/s10919-019-00318-x]
  21. Sheeran P, Gollwitzer PM, Bargh JA. Nonconscious processes and health. Health Psychol. 2013;32(5):460–73. [PMID: 22888816]
  22. Marteau TM, Hollands GJ, Fletcher PC. Changing human behavior to prevent disease: the importance of targeting automatic processes. Sci (Am Assoc Adv Sci). 2012;337(6101):1492–5. [DOI: 10.1126/science.1226918]
  23. Wieber F, Thürmer LJ, Gollwitzer PM. Promoting the translation of intentions into action by implementation intentions: behavioral effects and physiological correlates. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;9(JULY):395–395. [PMID: 26236214]
  24. Taylor SE, et al. Harnessing the imagination: mental simulation, self-regulation, and coping. Am Psychol. 1998;53(4):429–39. [PMID: 9572006]
  25. Schwarzer R, et al. Social-cognitive predictors of physical exercise adherence: three longitudinal studies in rehabilitation. Health Psychol. 2008;27(1S):S54–63. [PMID: 18248106]
  26. Gerlach KD, et al (2011) Solving future problems: default network and executive activity associated with goal-directed mental simulations. NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2011. 55(4): p. 1816–1824.
  27. Gürdere C, et al. Do executive functions predict physical activity behavior? Meta-Analysis BMC Psychol. 2023;11(1):33–33. [PMID: 36732818]
  28. Meslot C, et al. Theory-based interventions combining mental simulation and planning techniques to improve physical activity: null results from two randomized controlled trials. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1789–1789. [PMID: 27899904]
  29. Hagger MS, Lonsdale A, Chatzisarantis NLD. Effectiveness of a brief intervention using mental simulations in reducing alcohol consumption in corporate employees. Psychol Health Med. 2011;16(4):375–92. [PMID: 21749236]
  30. Zhong W, Zhang G. Mental simulation to promote exercise intentions and behaviors. Front Psychol. 2021;12:589622–589622. [PMID: 34867568]
  31. Pham LB, Taylor SE. From thought to action: effects of process-versus outcome-based mental simulations on performance. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1999;25(2):250–60. [DOI: 10.1177/0146167299025002010]
  32. Chan CKY, Cameron LD. Promoting physical activity with goal-oriented mental imagery: a randomized controlled trial. J Behav Med. 2012;35(3):347–63. [PMID: 21695405]
  33. Krishna A, Morrin M, Sayin E. Smellizing cookies and salivating: a focus on olfactory imagery. J Consum Res. 2014;41(1):18–34. [DOI: 10.1086/674664]
  34. Shen H, Zhang M, Krishna A (2016), Computer interfaces and the "direct-touch" effect: can iPads increase the choice of hedonic food? J Market Res 2016. 53(5)(745–758).
  35. Keesman M, et al. Consumption simulations induce salivation to food cues. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(11):e0165449–e0165449. [PMID: 27820842]
  36. Di Maio S, et al. Habits and self-efficacy moderate the effects of intentions and planning on physical activity. Br J Health Psychol. 2021;26(1):50–66. [PMID: 32584510]
  37. Zhang HM (2019) Compensatory effects of unconscious goal initiation on ego depletion. (Master's thesis, Beijing Sport University), 2019.
  38. van Koningsbruggen GM, et al. Comparing two psychological interventions in reducing impulsive processes of eating behaviour: effects on self-selected portion size. Br J Health Psychol. 2014;19(4):767–82. [PMID: 24147757]
  39. General Administration of Sports of China. "National Fitness Guide." https://www.sport.gov.cn/n315/n331/n405/c819327/content.html . Accessed August 11, 2017.
  40. Michie S, et al. The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46(1):81–95. [PMID: 23512568]
  41. Zhang Y, and Xin Z, Initiation research in social psychology: paradigms and challenges. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016. 05(844–854).
  42. Chen R, Activation and pursuit of unconscious achievement goals. (Master's thesis, Southwest University) , 2014.
  43. Walsh D. Attenuating depletion using goal priming. J Consum Psychol. 2014;24(4):497–505. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcps.2014.05.001]
  44. Ding J, Li X, Zou Z, Reducing individuals' impulse buying behaviour using unconscious goal priming: the moderating role of individual goal states. Psychological Science, 2019. (01)(130–136).
  45. Doyen S, et al. Behavioral priming: it’s all in the mind, but whose mind? PLoS ONE. 2012;7(1):e29081–e29081. [PMID: 22279526]
  46. Godin G, Shephard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985;10(3):141. [PMID: 4053261]
  47. Amireault S, Godin G. The Godin-Shephard Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire: validity evidence supporting its use for classifying healthy adults into active and insufficiently active categories. Percept Mot Skills. 2015;120(2):604–22. [PMID: 25799030]
  48. Junqueira DR, et al. CONSORT Harms 2022 statement, explanation, and elaboration: updated guideline for the reporting of harms in randomised trials. BMJ (Online). 2023;381:e073725–e073725. [PMID: 37094878]
  49. Milkman KL, et al. Using implementation intentions prompts to enhance influenza vaccination rates. Proceed Natl Acad Sci - PNAS. 2011;108(26):10415–20. [DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1103170108]
  50. Milkman KL, et al. Planning prompts as a means of increasing preventive screening rates. Prev Med. 2013;56(1):92–3. [PMID: 23123859]
  51. Shah JY, Friedman R, Kruglanski AW. Forgetting all else: on the antecedents and consequences of goal shielding. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002;83(6):1261–80. [PMID: 12500810]
  52. van Koningsbruggen GM, et al. Implementation intentions as goal primes: boosting self-control in tempting environments. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2011;41(5):551–7. [DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.799]
  53. Hagger MS. Non-conscious processes and dual-process theories in health psychology. Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10(4):375–80. [PMID: 27718880]
  54. Dehaene S, et al. Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4(7):752–8. [PMID: 11426233]
  55. Chen R, et al., The occurrence mechanism and influencing factors of unconscious goal pursuit. Advances in Psychology, 2013. 3(1)(22–27).
  56. Bargh JA. What have we been priming all these years? On the development, mechanisms, and ecology of nonconscious social behavior. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2006;36(2):147–68. [PMID: 19844598]
  57. Hagger MS, et al. Effects of habit and intention on behavior: meta-analysis and test of key moderators. Motiv Sci. 2023;9(2):73–94. [DOI: 10.1037/mot0000294]
  58. Huang Q, et al. Replay-triggered brain-wide activation in humans. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):7185–217. [PMID: 39169063]
  59. Nummenmaa L, et al. Emotions promote social interaction by synchronizing brain activity across individuals. Proceed Natl Acad Sci - PNAS. 2012;109(24):9599–604. [DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1206095109]
  60. Szpunar KK, Schacter DL. Get real: effects of repeated simulation and emotion on the perceived plausibility of future experiences. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013;142(2):323–7. [PMID: 22686637]
  61. Landau JD, Libkuman TM, Wildman JC. Mental simulation inflates performance estimates for physical abilities. Mem Cognit. 2002;30(3):372–9. [PMID: 12061758]
  62. Hollands GJ, Marteau TM, Fletcher PC. Non-conscious processes in changing health-related behaviour: a conceptual analysis and framework. Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10(4):381–94. [PMID: 26745243]
  63. Pfeffer I, Strobach T. Effects of a planning intervention on physical activity behavior in an RCT: intention strength as moderator and action planning, coping planning, and coping self-efficacy as mediators. Sport Exerc Perform Psychol. 2019;8(2):192–209.
  64. Iso-Ahola SE. Non-consciously processed physical activity for survival versus consciously deliberated exercise for health. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1181671–1181671. [PMID: 37384173]
  65. Min J, et al., Accelerometer-derived 'weekend warrior' physical activity pattern and brain health. Nature aging, 2024.
  66. Dell’Acqua C, et al. Familial risk for depression is associated with reduced physical activity in young adults: evidence from a wrist-worn actigraphy study. Transl Psychiatry. 2024;14(1):219–219. [PMID: 38806490]

Grants

  1. 32171076/National Natural Science Foundation of China
Journal Article
Article has an altmetric score of 6

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0activityconsciousprimingphysicalmanipulationunconsciousstudysimulationeffectsintentioninterventionp = interventionsgoaleffective1participantsvs2mentalStudyfoundConsciousPhysicalInterventionBACKGROUND:PreviousstudiesinvestigatedencouragementhealthybehaviorsHoweverdirectcomparisonstwoapproacheslimitedresultingmaylackprecisionaimedevaluateengageidentifyingapplyingmethodtargetedbridgegapactualMETHOD:116screened2 × 2 × primecontrolonlineexperimentexamineinfluenceimplementationBuildingresultsemployedrandomizedcontrolledtrial127assessbehaviorRESULTS:showed046004significantlyincreasedchoicesportsactivitiessignificantimpactsmixedlevelsimmediatelyone-weekpost-intervention001day-afternotablegroupCONCLUSIONS:exploredcausalrelationshipprocesspromotioneffectInitiationPromoteActivity:BehavioralExperimentRandomizedControlledTrialMentalstimulation

Similar Articles

Cited By