To believe or not to believe: leader's belief about emotion usefulness and its impact on team dynamics.

Jin Suk Park, Jaeeun Shin, Taehun Lee
Author Information
  1. Jin Suk Park: College of Business and Management, VinUniversity, Hanoi, Vietnam.
  2. Jaeeun Shin: Department of Psychology, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.
  3. Taehun Lee: School of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul, Korea. lee.taehun@gmail.com.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aims to investigate the impact of a leader's beliefs in the usefulness of emotions on the emotional competence and relationship conflicts of their teams.
METHODS: The data were collected through an online survey targeting leaders with at least three years of experience in managerial positions in South Korean workplaces, with a total of 326 participants. Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) was conducted to classify leaders into latent groups based on their beliefs regarding the usefulness of positive and negative emotions.
RESULTS: The latent profile analysis of the leader's beliefs in the usefulness of positive and negative emotions identified four groups: High Usefulness (HU) Group, High Positive Usefulness (HPU) Group, Reference Group for comparison, and Low Usefulness (LU) Group. It was found that both the HU Group and the HPU Group, who perceive the usefulness of both types of emotions and positive emotions, respectively, showed higher levels of emotional repair and lower levels of relationship conflict within the team compared to the Reference Group and the LU Group.
CONCLUSIONS: This study not only fills a gap in organizational research by establishing a clear link between leaders' emotional beliefs and team dynamics but also emphasizes the social influence of leaders' emotions within the team setting. The findings of this research advocate for a strategic update to leadership development programs, suggesting the integration of elements specifically designed to augment leaders' understanding and management of emotional dynamics within their teams.

Keywords

References

  1. Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 18;14:1255660 [PMID: 37790238]
  2. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2012 May-Jun;19(3):235-46 [PMID: 21374759]
  3. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Dec;101(6):1332-50 [PMID: 21843012]
  4. J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5 [PMID: 16367493]
  5. PLoS One. 2020 Apr 14;15(4):e0231395 [PMID: 32287328]
  6. Front Psychol. 2020 May 26;11:893 [PMID: 32528354]
  7. J Appl Psychol. 2021 Mar;106(3):330-344 [PMID: 33871270]
  8. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Apr;92(4):731-44 [PMID: 17469955]
  9. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2000 Jun;24(6):882-91 [PMID: 10888079]
  10. Clin Psychol Rev. 2016 Apr;45:81-8 [PMID: 27086086]
  11. Cogn Emot. 2016;30(1):3-19 [PMID: 26391957]
  12. Int J Hosp Manag. 2021 Feb;93:102778 [PMID: 36919171]
  13. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Oct;81(4):684-96 [PMID: 11642354]

Grants

  1. Grant No. 2022R1F1A1064562/Korea government (MSIT)

MeSH Term

Humans
Leadership
Male
Female
Emotions
Adult
Republic of Korea
Group Processes
Middle Aged
Interpersonal Relations
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0Groupusefulnessemotionsbeliefsemotionalteamleader'spositiveUsefulnesswithinleaders'dynamicsEmotionstudyimpactcompetencerelationshipteamsleaderslatentnegativeHighHUHPUReferenceLUlevelsconflictresearchBACKGROUND:aimsinvestigateconflictsMETHODS:datacollectedonlinesurveytargetingleastthreeyearsexperiencemanagerialpositionsSouthKoreanworkplacestotal326participantsLatentProfileAnalysisLPAconductedclassifygroupsbasedregardingRESULTS:profileanalysisidentifiedfourgroups:PositivecomparisonLowfoundperceivetypesrespectivelyshowedhigherrepairlowercomparedCONCLUSIONS:fillsgaporganizationalestablishingclearlinkalsoemphasizessocialinfluencesettingfindingsadvocatestrategicupdateleadershipdevelopmentprogramssuggestingintegrationelementsspecificallydesignedaugmentunderstandingmanagementbelievebelieve:beliefemotionLeadershipRelationship

Similar Articles

Cited By