Exploring the Feasibility of a Caregiver Burden-Mastery Hybrid Assessment Tool With Decision Matrix in a Memory Clinic: A Multimethod Study.

Ee Yuee Chan, Zhi Lei Ong, George Frederick Glass, Siew Ling Ang, Jun Pei Lim, Noorhazlina Binte Ali, Wee Shiong Lim
Author Information
  1. Ee Yuee Chan: Nursing Implementation, Translation and Research Office, Nursing Service, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  2. Zhi Lei Ong: Nursing Implementation, Translation and Research Office, Nursing Service, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  3. George Frederick Glass: Nursing Implementation, Translation and Research Office, Nursing Service, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. ORCID
  4. Siew Ling Ang: Department of Geriatric Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  5. Jun Pei Lim: Department of Geriatric Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  6. Noorhazlina Binte Ali: Department of Geriatric Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  7. Wee Shiong Lim: Department of Geriatric Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

Abstract

Introduction: Family members caring for a person living with dementia (PWD) can experience caregiver burden, leading to psychological distress if unmanaged. It's essential for healthcare professionals, especially nurses to identify caregivers at risk of stress and depression, triggering prompt management during their contact with caregivers of PWD. The study team developed an evidence-based caregiver burden-mastery hybrid assessment and intervention decision matrix (CHAT-MI) for caregivers of PWD and examined its feasibility of use.
Objective: To determine the feasibility and usability of implementing the CHAT-MI assessment-decision matrix tool in an outpatient setting in Singapore.
Methods: CHAT-MI was developed through earlier research, research evidence, clinical guidelines, and expert opinion. A multimethod study was conducted in a Singapore outpatient memory clinic from November 2020 to January 2021. Caregivers of PWD who attended the clinic self-administered the assessment tool to determine their burden and personal mastery levels. Clinicians used a decision matrix to guide interventions based on the assessments. Feedback was gathered from both caregivers and clinicians through surveys and semistructured interviews.
Results: Thirty-four caregivers and six clinicians participated in the study. Caregivers found the burden-mastery assessment tool relatively easy to use and understand and helpful. Clinicians found the assessment-decision matrix tool acceptable, feasible, and useful, enhancing standard care by providing insights into caregivers' current coping capabilities. Clinicians shared that junior clinicians could benefit from CHAT-MI to better detect caregiving stress and deliver interventions. Nevertheless, more can be done to train clinicians in the understanding of the concept of mastery (i.e., perceived control over life events) to help clinicians better engage and support caregivers.
Conclusion: CHAT-MI was found to be relatively brief and can aid the outpatient clinic setting. This suggests that such an evidence-based assessment cum intervention can be considered for use in a real-world clinical setting to aid both caregivers and clinicians.

Keywords

References

  1. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2010;30(6):509-16 [PMID: 21252545]
  2. J Eval Clin Pract. 2001 Aug;7(3):271-87 [PMID: 11555086]
  3. J Health Soc Behav. 1978 Mar;19(1):2-21 [PMID: 649936]
  4. J Nutr Health Aging. 2018;22(10):1238-1245 [PMID: 30498832]
  5. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005 Mar;29(3):245-54 [PMID: 15781175]
  6. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021 Jun;36(6):811-821 [PMID: 33271636]
  7. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 19;22(1):933 [PMID: 35854296]
  8. J Adv Nurs. 2022 May;78(5):1513-1523 [PMID: 35285537]
  9. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jan 28;20(1):13 [PMID: 31992301]
  10. Gerontologist. 1990 Oct;30(5):583-94 [PMID: 2276631]
  11. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2010 Nov;26(4):243-58 [PMID: 20971405]
  12. Int Psychogeriatr. 2014 Apr;26(4):677-86 [PMID: 24382159]
  13. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Dec;16(12):1034-41 [PMID: 26593303]
  14. Gerontologist. 1992 Oct;32(5):656-64 [PMID: 1427278]
  15. Health Psychol. 2011 Sep;30(5):615-32 [PMID: 21534674]
  16. Int Psychogeriatr. 2012 Oct;24(10):1571-80 [PMID: 22647248]
  17. J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23(6):578-585 [PMID: 31233081]
  18. Dementia (London). 2021 Aug;20(6):2091-2108 [PMID: 33382000]
  19. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Jan 06;10:1 [PMID: 20053272]
  20. Gerontologist. 1980 Dec;20(6):649-55 [PMID: 7203086]
  21. Int Psychogeriatr. 2012 Nov;24(11):1846-54 [PMID: 22874633]
  22. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2010 Oct;39(10):758-63 [PMID: 21063635]
  23. J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2005 Dec;20(4):319-34 [PMID: 17024577]
  24. J Appl Gerontol. 2021 Jul;40(7):731-741 [PMID: 32456510]
  25. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011 May;26(5):527-35 [PMID: 20690132]
  26. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(32):1373-1430 [PMID: 27820461]
  27. Can Geriatr J. 2012 Sep;15(3):85-94 [PMID: 23259021]
  28. Aging Ment Health. 2009 Mar;13(2):162-70 [PMID: 19347683]
  29. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2023 Jan-Mar 01;37(1):59-65 [PMID: 36706328]
  30. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;16(4):310-7 [PMID: 18378556]
  31. Geriatr Nurs. 2019 Sep - Oct;40(5):502-509 [PMID: 30979516]
  32. Int Psychogeriatr. 2022 Sep;34(9):827-838 [PMID: 33455610]
  33. BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jan 19;21(1):67 [PMID: 33468059]
  34. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2013 Jul;15(7):367 [PMID: 23712718]
  35. Gerontologist. 2001 Oct;41(5):652-7 [PMID: 11574710]
  36. Clin Gerontol. 2022 May-Jun;45(3):525-537 [PMID: 32065071]
  37. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 12;19(8): [PMID: 35457504]
  38. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2019 Mar 1;46(2):159-169 [PMID: 30767970]
  39. J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;86(4):1527-1543 [PMID: 35253744]
  40. J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Nov;22(11):1487-92 [PMID: 17823840]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0caregiverscliniciansassessmentCHAT-MItoolPWDcanmatrixcaregiverburdenstressstudydecisionuseoutpatientsettingclinicmasteryCliniciansfoundaiddementiadevelopedevidence-basedburden-masteryinterventionfeasibilitydetermineassessment-decisionSingaporeresearchclinicalCaregiversinterventionsrelativelybetterIntroduction:FamilymemberscaringpersonlivingexperienceleadingpsychologicaldistressunmanagedessentialhealthcareprofessionalsespeciallynursesidentifyriskdepressiontriggeringpromptmanagementcontactteamhybridexaminedObjective:usabilityimplementingMethods:earlierevidenceguidelinesexpertopinionmultimethodconductedmemoryNovember2020January2021attendedself-administeredpersonallevelsusedguidebasedassessmentsFeedbackgatheredsurveyssemistructuredinterviewsResults:Thirty-foursixparticipatedeasyunderstandhelpfulacceptablefeasibleusefulenhancingstandardcareprovidinginsightscaregivers'currentcopingcapabilitiessharedjuniorbenefitdetectcaregivingdeliverNeverthelessdonetrainunderstandingconceptieperceivedcontrollifeeventshelpengagesupportConclusion:briefsuggestscumconsideredreal-worldExploringFeasibilityCaregiverBurden-MasteryHybridAssessmentToolDecisionMatrixMemoryClinic:MultimethodStudyZaritscreening

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.