Protocol of randomized-controlled trial to examine the effectiveness of three different interventions to reduce healthcare provider burnout.

Catalina Ruple, John Brodhead, Lila Rabinovich, Doerte U Junghaenel, Tiffany Nakamura, Jonathan Wong, Sophia De-Oliveira, Joan Brown, Phuong Nguyen, Jenny Horn, Renee Middleton, Michelle Brahe, Cheng Wen, Sujeet Rao, Caroline Nguyen, Gil Shlamovitz, Dara Marino, Felipe Osorno, Steven Siegel
Author Information
  1. Catalina Ruple: Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
  2. John Brodhead: Department of Internal Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States.
  3. Lila Rabinovich: Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
  4. Doerte U Junghaenel: Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
  5. Tiffany Nakamura: Department of Psychiatry and the Behavioral Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States.
  6. Jonathan Wong: Department of Psychiatry and the Behavioral Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States.
  7. Sophia De-Oliveira: Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
  8. Joan Brown: Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States.
  9. Phuong Nguyen: Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
  10. Jenny Horn: Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
  11. Renee Middleton: Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
  12. Michelle Brahe: Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
  13. Cheng Wen: Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
  14. Sujeet Rao: USC Dornsife Public Exchange, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
  15. Caroline Nguyen: USC Dornsife Public Exchange, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
  16. Gil Shlamovitz: Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
  17. Dara Marino: Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
  18. Felipe Osorno: Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
  19. Steven Siegel: Department of Psychiatry and the Behavioral Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States. steven.siegel@med.usc.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Burnout is among the greatest challenges facing healthcare today. Healthcare providers have been found to experience burnout at significant rates, with COVID-19 exacerbating the challenge. Burnout in the healthcare setting has been associated with decreases in job satisfaction, productivity, professionalism, quality of care, and patient satisfaction, as well as increases in career choice regret, intent to leave, and patient safety incidents. In this context, there is a growing need to reduce provider burnout through targeted interventions, yet little is known about what types of interventions may be most effective. The present study aims to contribute to and extend prior literature by using rigorous randomized controlled trial (RCT) methodology with a parallel group design to examine the effectiveness of different interventions in decreasing mental distress, increasing self-efficacy and attenuating inefficiencies and dissatisfiers in the work environment to achieve sustainable improvement.'
METHODS: The present study is an ongoing randomized controlled trial (RCT) that examines the effectiveness of three different types of interventions to reduce provider burnout: an intervention targeting emotional wellbeing and resilience, Electronic Health Record (EHR) skills training, and performance improvement training, relative to a no-treatment control group. This study aims to enroll a total of 400 healthcare providers in a large urban hospital system. Outcomes will be assessed at post-treatment and 6-month follow-up. Key outcomes include burnout, emotional health, intent to leave, EHR mastery, and confidence in performance improvement. Changes in outcome measurements from baseline to post-intervention across the intervention and control groups will be conducted using linear mixed-effects models (LMM).
DISCUSSION: This study is novel in that it compares several interventions addressing both personal as well as system-level drivers of provider burnout that have been theorized to operate among healthcare providers. In addition, post-treatment and longer-term follow-up assessments will provide insight into the maintenance of effects. Another innovation is the inclusion of different types of patient-facing providers in the study population (doctors, nurses, and therapists).
TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05780892) on March 10th, 2023.

Keywords

Associated Data

ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT05780892

References

  1. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2011 Nov-Dec;87(6):493-8 [PMID: 22170452]
  2. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 Feb 04;9:8 [PMID: 21294858]
  3. Health Soc Care Community. 2021 Jan;29(1):113-126 [PMID: 32613644]
  4. Pract Neurol. 2023 Apr;23(2):104-110 [PMID: 36601750]
  5. Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Sep 1;97(9):585-586 [PMID: 31474769]
  6. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2023 Jul-Aug;63(4S):S93-S100 [PMID: 36585298]
  7. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 13;(11):CD002892 [PMID: 25391582]
  8. JAMA. 2018 Sep 18;320(11):1131-1150 [PMID: 30326495]
  9. Am J Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 1;177(10):955-964 [PMID: 32660300]
  10. J Grad Med Educ. 2014 Mar;6(1):78-84 [PMID: 24701315]
  11. Psychother Res. 2021 Mar;31(3):355-368 [PMID: 32762513]
  12. Med Care Res Rev. 2020 Oct;77(5):371-386 [PMID: 31216940]
  13. JAMA Pediatr. 2022 Apr 01;176(4):365-372 [PMID: 35072694]
  14. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Jan 14;289:481-484 [PMID: 35062195]
  15. J Intern Med. 2018 Jun;283(6):516-529 [PMID: 29505159]
  16. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 10;18(1):274 [PMID: 29636052]
  17. PLoS One. 2018 Nov 12;13(11):e0206840 [PMID: 30418984]
  18. J Appl Psychol. 2001 Jun;86(3):499-512 [PMID: 11419809]
  19. Front Public Health. 2021 Oct 29;9:750529 [PMID: 34778184]
  20. SAGE Open Med. 2022 Mar 14;10:20503121221083080 [PMID: 35646362]
  21. Explore (NY). 2021 Mar-Apr;17(2):109-114 [PMID: 33293201]
  22. BMJ. 2022 Sep 14;378:e070442 [PMID: 36104064]
  23. J Grad Med Educ. 2016 May;8(2):256-9 [PMID: 27168899]
  24. J Perinatol. 2021 Sep;41(9):2225-2234 [PMID: 34366432]
  25. J Health Psychol. 2010 Oct;15(7):1075-81 [PMID: 20453053]
  26. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2021 Oct;119(5):317-324 [PMID: 34569739]
  27. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Mar 1;28(3):628-631 [PMID: 33029643]
  28. Perspect Med Educ. 2019 Jun;8(3):167-176 [PMID: 31098982]
  29. Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 13;10:284 [PMID: 30918490]
  30. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Apr 23;28(5):960-966 [PMID: 33880534]
  31. Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78 [PMID: 11392867]
  32. J Interprof Educ Pract. 2023 Sep;32:100661 [PMID: 37305404]
  33. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Apr 23;28(5):931-937 [PMID: 33166384]
  34. Ann Med. 2023 Dec;55(1):2234392 [PMID: 37459584]
  35. J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Aug;30(8):1105-11 [PMID: 25724571]
  36. J Occup Health Psychol. 2020 Feb;25(1):1-16 [PMID: 31829662]
  37. J Affect Disord. 2020 Jan 1;260:728-737 [PMID: 31563072]
  38. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 06;19(9): [PMID: 35565061]
  39. Paediatr Anaesth. 2022 Nov;32(11):1209-1215 [PMID: 35302676]
  40. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2210752 [PMID: 35522281]
  41. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13 [PMID: 11556941]
  42. Med Teach. 2017 Apr;39(4):409-414 [PMID: 28379084]
  43. Int Nurs Rev. 2010 Dec;57(4):485-92 [PMID: 21050201]
  44. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Apr;33(4):883-894 [PMID: 31598914]
  45. J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Apr;32(4):475-482 [PMID: 27785668]
  46. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Oct 01;179(10):1406-1414 [PMID: 31380892]
  47. Ann Fam Med. 2013 Sep-Oct;11(5):412-20 [PMID: 24019272]

MeSH Term

Adult
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Burnout, Professional
COVID-19
Health Personnel
Job Satisfaction
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
SARS-CoV-2
Self Efficacy

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0interventionsstudyhealthcareburnoutprovidersproviderdifferentimprovementBurnoutreducetypestrialeffectivenesswillamongHealthcaresatisfactionpatientwellintentleavepresentaimsusingrandomizedcontrolledRCTgroupexaminethreeinterventionemotionalresilienceElectronicEHRtrainingperformancecontrolpost-treatmentfollow-uphealthBACKGROUND:greatestchallengesfacingtodayfoundexperiencesignificantratesCOVID-19exacerbatingchallengesettingassociateddecreasesjobproductivityprofessionalismqualitycareincreasescareerchoiceregretsafetyincidentscontextgrowingneedtargetedyetlittleknownmayeffectivecontributeextendpriorliteraturerigorousmethodologyparalleldesigndecreasingmentaldistressincreasingself-efficacyattenuatinginefficienciesdissatisfiersworkenvironmentachievesustainable'METHODS:ongoingexaminesburnout:targetingwellbeingHealthRecordskillsrelativeno-treatmentenrolltotal400largeurbanhospitalsystemOutcomesassessed6-monthKeyoutcomesincludemasteryconfidenceChangesoutcomemeasurementsbaselinepost-interventionacrossgroupsconductedlinearmixed-effectsmodelsLMMDISCUSSION:novelcomparesseveraladdressingpersonalsystem-leveldriverstheorizedoperateadditionlonger-termassessmentsprovideinsightmaintenanceeffectsAnotherinnovationinclusionpatient-facingpopulationdoctorsnursestherapistsTRIALREGISTRATION:registeredClinicalTrialsgovNCT05780892March10th2023Protocolrandomized-controlledrecordsEmotionalInterventionsPerformanceRandomizedControlledTrial

Similar Articles

Cited By