Lower Commercial Rates for Breast Surgical Procedures are Associated with Socioeconomic Disadvantage: A Transparency in Coverage Analysis.

Danielle H Rochlin, Yang Wang, Uchechukwu O Amakiri, Jacob Levy, Lillian Boe, Clifford C Sheckter, Gerard Anderson, Babak J Mehrara, Jonas A Nelson, Evan Matros
Author Information
  1. Danielle H Rochlin: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. rochlind@mskcc.org.
  2. Yang Wang: Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  3. Uchechukwu O Amakiri: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  4. Jacob Levy: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  5. Lillian Boe: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  6. Clifford C Sheckter: Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.
  7. Gerard Anderson: Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  8. Babak J Mehrara: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  9. Jonas A Nelson: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  10. Evan Matros: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) implemented the Transparency in Coverage Rule in 2022, which requires payers to disclose commercial rates for the first time in the history of the US healthcare system. The purpose of this study was to characterize payer-disclosed commercial facility rates and examine the relationship with county-level social disadvantage for common breast surgical procedures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of 2023 pricing data for 14 ablative and reconstructive breast procedures from Turquoise Health. Socioeconomic disadvantage was quantified using the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI). Within- and across-payer ratios quantified rate variation. Linear regression assessed the relationship between relative value unit (RVU)-adjusted median commercial rates and facility-level variables including SVI quartile.
RESULTS: There were 4,748,074 unique commercial rates disclosed by four payers from negotiations with 10,023 hospitals. Rates varied by a factor of 9.8-15.6 within and 10.0-18.1 across payers. RVU-adjusted commercial rate decreased in a stepwise fashion as SVI quartile increased and varied by payer (p < 0.001). Higher RVU-adjusted rates were associated with hospitals compared with ambulatory facilities (β = 138, 95% CI 138-139, p < 0.001). Lower rates were associated with areas of less healthcare infrastructure (β = - 37, 95% CI - 38 to - 37, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Facility rates for breast surgical procedures varied significantly within and between payers and were higher for hospitals compared with ambulatory surgery centers. Facilities in areas of higher social vulnerability were associated with lower negotiated rates. The health equity implications of lower payment in areas of higher disadvantage, particularly in terms of access to care, deserve further investigation.

Keywords

References

  1. Coughlin SS. Social determinants of breast cancer risk, stage, and survival. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;177(3):537–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05340-7 . [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05340-7]
  2. Fwelo P, Nwosu KOS, Adekunle TE, et al. Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic differences in breast cancer surgery performed and delayed treatment: mediating impact on mortality. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023;199(3):511–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-06941-z . [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-06941-z]
  3. Bauder AR, Gross CP, Killelea BK, Butler PD, Kovach SJ, Fox JP. The relationship between geographic access to plastic surgeons and breast reconstruction rates among women undergoing mastectomy for cancer. Ann Plast Surg. 2017;78(3):324–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000000849 . [DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000000849]
  4. Butler PD, Morris MP, Momoh AO. Persistent disparities in postmastectomy breast reconstruction and strategies for mitigation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(11):6099–108. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10487-z . [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10487-z]
  5. Sisco M, Du H, Warner JP, Howard MA, Winchester DP, Yao K. Have we expanded the equitable delivery of postmastectomy breast reconstruction in the new millennium? Evidence from the national cancer data base. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(5):658–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.07.008 . [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.07.008]
  6. Wirth LS, Hinyard L, Keller J, Bucholz E, Schwartz T. Geographic variations in racial disparities in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a SEER database analysis. Breast J. 2019;25(1):112–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.13166 . [DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13166]
  7. Retrouvey H, Solaja O, Gagliardi AR, Webster F, Zhong T. Barriers of access to breast reconstruction: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(3):465e–76e. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000005313 . [DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000005313]
  8. Reinhardt UE. The pricing of U.S. hospital services: chaos behind a veil of secrecy. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006;25(1):57–69. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.25.1.57 . [DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.1.57]
  9. Rochlin DH, Rizk NM, Mehrara BJ, Matros E, Sheckter CC. Free flap reconstruction in the era of commercial price transparency: what are we paying for? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024;153(5):1187–95. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000011021 . [DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000011021]
  10. Rochlin DH, Rizk NM, Flores RL, Matros E, Sheckter CC. The reality of commercial payer-negotiated rates in cleft lip and palate repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023;152(3):476e–87e. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000010329 . [DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000010329]
  11. Rochlin DH, Rizk NM, Matros E, Wagner TH, Sheckter CC. Negotiated rates for surgical cancer care in the era of price transparency- prices reflect market competition. Ann Surg. 2024;279(3):385–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000006091 . [DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006091]
  12. Rochlin DH, Sheckter CC, Brazio PS, et al. Commercial insurance rates and coding for lymphedema procedures: the current state of confusion and need for consensus. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024;153(1):245–55. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000010591 . [DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000010591]
  13. Rochlin DH, Rizk NM, Matros E, Wagner TH, Sheckter CC. Commercial price variation for breast reconstruction in the era of price transparency. JAMA Surg. 2023;158(2):152–60. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2022.6402 . [DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.6402]
  14. Hospital Price Transparency. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Updated November 2, 2023. Accessed June 13, 2024, https://www.cms.gov/priorities/key-initiatives/hospital-price-transparency
  15. Transparency in Coverage. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Updated September 6, 2023. Accessed June 13, 2024, https://www.cms.gov/priorities/key-initiatives/healthplan-price-transparency
  16. Wang Y, Meiselbach M, Anderson GF, Bai G. Hospital pricing information consistent between transparency-in-coverage data and other commercial data sources. Health Aff Forefront blog. November 9, 2023, 2023. https://www.healthaffairs.org/content/forefront/hospital-pricing-information-consistent-between-transparency-coverage-data-and-other
  17. Wang Y, Xu J, Meiselbach M, Wang Y, Anderson S, Bai G. Insurer price transparency rule: what has been disclosed? Health Aff Forefront blog. February 2, 2023, 2023. https://www.healthaffairs.org/content/forefront/insurer-price-transparency-rule-has-been-disclosed
  18. Price Transparency Impact Report, Q1 2023. 2023:1-25. https://turquoise.health/reports
  19. Sharfstein JM, Stuart EA, Antos J. Global budgets in Maryland. JAMA. 2018;319(24):2475. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.5871 . [DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.5871]
  20. Competition in Health Insurance: A Comprehensive Study of US Markets. 2023. https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/competition-health-insurance-us-markets.pdf
  21. CDC/ATSDR Social Vulnerability Index (CDC/ATSDR SVI): Overview. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) / Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Updated May 17, 2024. Accessed June 11, 2024, https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/placeandhealth/svi/index.html
  22. Tran T, Rousseau MA, Farris DP, Bauer C, Nelson KC, Doan HQ. The social vulnerability index as a risk stratification tool for health disparity research in cancer patients: a scoping review. CCC. 2023;34(5):407–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01683-1 . [DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01683-1]
  23. Pham R, Gorodeski EZ, Al-Kindi S. Social vulnerability and location of death in heart failure in the United States. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023;48(7):101689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.101689 . [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.101689]
  24. Lee YC, Chang KY, Mirsaeidi M. Association of county-degree social vulnerability with chronic respiratory disease mortality in the United States. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023;20(1):47–57. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202202-136OC . [DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202202-136OC]
  25. CDC/ATSDR SVI 2020 Documentation. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Updated August 5, 2022. Accessed June 12, 2024, https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/placeandhealth/svi/documentation/SVI_documentation_2020.html
  26. Minority Health SVI. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Minority Health. Updated June 2023. Accessed June 12, 2024, https://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/minority-health-svi
  27. Physician Fee Schedule - October 2023 release. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Accessed September 5, 2023, https://www.cms.gov/medicare/medicare-fee-service-payment/physicianfeesched/pfs-relative-value-files/rvu23d
  28. Shim JY, Stoffel V, Neubauer D, Gosman AA, Matros E, Reid CM. The cost of doing business: an appraisal of relative value units in plastic surgery and other surgical subspecialties. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023;152(5):1129–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000010306 . [DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000010306]
  29. Wang Y, Wang Y, Plummer E, Chernew ME, Anderson G, Bai G. Facility fees for colonoscopy procedures at hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers. JAMA Health Forum. 2023;4(12):e234025. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.4025 . [DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.4025]
  30. Wang Y, Xu J, Anderson G, Bai G. Variation in commercial hospital prices within hospital across national insurers—implication for price benchmarking. Presented at: 13th Annual Conference of the American Society of Health Economists; 2024; San Diego, CA. Session Insurer and Hospital Behavior. https://ashecon.confex.com/ashecon/2024/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/14701
  31. Berkowitz ST, Siktberg J, Hamdan SA, Triana AJ, Patel SN. Health care price transparency in ophthalmology. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021;139(11):1210–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.3951 . [DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.3951]
  32. D’Amore T, Goh GS, Courtney PM, Klein GR. Do new hospital price transparency regulations reflect value in arthroplasty? J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022;30(8):e658–63. https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-d-21-00696 . [DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-21-00696]
  33. Jiang JX, Makary MA, Bai G. Commercial negotiated prices for CMS-specified shoppable radiology services in U.S. hospitals. Radiology. 2022;302(3):622–4. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021211948 . [DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021211948]
  34. Jiang JX, Makary MA, Bai G. Where are the high-price hospitals? With the transparency rule in effect, colonoscopy prices suggest they’re all over the place. Health Affairs Forefront blog. August 11, 2021, 2021. https://www.healthaffairs.org/content/forefront/high-price-hospitals-transparency-rule-effect-colonoscopy-prices-suggest-they-re-all
  35. Wang AA, Xiao R, Sethi RKV, Rathi VK, Scangas GA. Private payer-negotiated prices for outpatient otolaryngologic surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;167(2):262–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/01945998211049330 . [DOI: 10.1177/01945998211049330]
  36. Wu SS, Rathi VK, Ross JS, Sethi RKV, Xiao R. Payer-negotiated prices for telemedicine services. J Gen Intern Med. 2022;37(13):3495–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07398-4 . [DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07398-4]
  37. Our Methodology. Lown Institute Hospitals Index. July 3, 2024, https://lownhospitalsindex.org/rankings/our-methodology/
  38. Frakt AB. How much do hospitals cost shift? A review of the evidence. Milbank Q. 2011;89(1):90–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00621.x . [DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00621.x]
  39. Gong JH, Koh DJ, Sobti N, et al. Trends in hospital billing for mastectomy and breast reconstruction procedures from 2013 to 2020. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2222-8676 . [DOI: 10.1055/a-2222-8676]
  40. Panchal H, Shamsunder MG, Sheinin A, et al. Impact of physician payments on microvascular breast reconstruction: an all-payer claim database analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145(2):333–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000006453 . [DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000006453]
  41. Sheckter CC, Panchal HJ, Razdan SN, et al. The influence of physician payments on the method of breast reconstruction: a national claims analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(4):434e–42e. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000004727 . [DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000004727]
  42. Gupta N, Haglin JM, Marostica CW, Thornburg DA, Casey WJ 3rd. Trends in Medicare reimbursement for reconstructive plastic surgery procedures: 2000 to 2019. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;146(1):1541–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000006914 . [DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000006914]
  43. Friedlander DF, Krimphove MJ, Cole AP, et al. Where is the value in ambulatory versus inpatient surgery? Ann Surg. 2021;273(5):909–16. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000003578 . [DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003578]
  44. Billig JI, Lu Y, Momoh AO, Chung KC. A nationwide analysis of cost variation for autologous free flap breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(11):1039–47. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.2339 . [DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.2339]
  45. Cerullo M, Lee C, Offodile AC 2nd. Effect of regional hospital market competition on use patterns of free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(6):1438–46. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000004991 . [DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000004991]
  46. Cutler DM, Scott Morton F. Hospitals, market share, and consolidation. JAMA. 2013;310(18):1964–70. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281675 . [DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.281675]
  47. Robinson J. Hospitals respond to Medicare payment shortfalls by both shifting costs and cutting them, based on market concentration. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30(7):1265–71. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0220 . [DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0220]
  48. CY 2024 Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) Policy Changes: Hospital Price Transparency (CMS-1786-FC). Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; 2023. November 2, 2023. Accessed June 16, 2024. https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/hospital-price-transparency-fact-sheet

Grants

  1. KL2 TR003143/NCATS NIH HHS
  2. KL2TR003143/CTSA
  3. P30 CA008748/NCI NIH HHS
  4. P30 CA008748/NCI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
Female
Cross-Sectional Studies
Breast Neoplasms
United States
Socioeconomic Factors
Insurance Coverage
Mammaplasty
Mastectomy
Healthcare Disparities
Socioeconomic Disparities in Health

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ratescommercialpayersTransparencydisadvantagebreastproceduresSVIhospitalsvariedp<0001associatedareashigherCoveragehealthcarestudyfacilityrelationshipsocialsurgicalHealthSocioeconomicquantifiedSocialratevariationquartile10RateswithinRVU-adjustedcomparedambulatoryβ=95%CILower- 37surgeryvulnerabilitylowerequityCommercialBreastBACKGROUND:CentersMedicare&MedicaidServicesCMSimplementedRule2022requiresdisclosefirsttimehistoryUSsystempurposecharacterizepayer-disclosedexaminecounty-levelcommonMATERIALSANDMETHODS:performedcross-sectional2023pricingdata14ablativereconstructiveTurquoiseusingVulnerabilityIndexWithin-across-payerratiosLinearregressionassessedrelativevalueunitRVU-adjustedmedianfacility-levelvariablesincludingRESULTS:4748074uniquedisclosedfournegotiations023factor98-1560-181acrossdecreasedstepwisefashionincreasedpayerHigherfacilities138138-139lessinfrastructure- 38CONCLUSIONS:FacilitysignificantlycentersFacilitiesnegotiatedhealthimplicationspaymentparticularlytermsaccesscaredeserveinvestigationSurgicalProceduresAssociatedDisadvantage:AnalysisPriceindexcoverage

Similar Articles

Cited By