OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience
Advanced Search
Journal of gambling studies
Dec 28, 2024;

Perceived Riskiness and Problem Gambling Across Different Forms of Gambling: A Focus on 'Soft' Gambling.

David Fiedor, Miroslav Charv��t, Filip Kova����k, Jind��ich Frajer, Eva Aigelov��, Miloslav ��er��
Author Information
  1. David Fiedor: Department of Geography, Faculty of Science, Palack�� University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ORCID
  2. Miroslav Charv��t: Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Palack�� University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ORCID
  3. Filip Kova����k: Department of Geography, Faculty of Science, Palack�� University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic. filip.kovarik01@upol.cz. ORCID
  4. Jind��ich Frajer: Department of Geography, Faculty of Science, Palack�� University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ORCID
  5. Eva Aigelov��: Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Palack�� University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ORCID
  6. Miloslav ��er��: Department of Geography, Faculty of Science, Palack�� University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ORCID
PMID: 39731638 DOI: 10.1007/s10899-024-10370-y

Abstract

Gambling encompasses a wide variety of activities, and the structural characteristics of each form contribute to its potential risk. However, the literature does not fully agree on the risk levels of certain gambling forms. In this study, we classify less risky gambling forms (soft forms) based on public perceptions of their riskiness. We examine the link between gambling experience and problem gambling prevalence. A survey was conducted in a model region of the Czech Republic, a post-socialist country with high gambling availability, with N���=���2,498 respondents. A typology of gambling forms (lotteries, betting, and casino games) was created based on perceived risk similarities. Lotteries are the most frequently played gambling form, with 86.3% reporting lifetime participation. Among those who exclusively engage in lottery-type forms, 15 percentage points more women than men participated in the last year, and the gap widens to 31 points over a lifetime. Forms of gambling perceived as more risky show a lower proportion of non-problem gamblers, both for recent and lifetime participation. Furthermore, individuals who gambled within the past month or year are at higher risk of developing gambling problems compared to those whose gambling experiences were less recent.

Keywords

Experience Gambling Lottery PGSI short-form Perceived riskiness Soft gambling

References

  1. Bako��, E., Hr��za, F., Fiedor, D., & Dol��k Kleme��ov��, K. (2021). The perception of inter-municipal cooperation by local officials and manage. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 15(1), 1���14. https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2021-0002 [DOI: 10.2478/cejpp-2021-0002]
  2. Binde, P., Romild, U., & Volberg, R. (2017). Forms of gambling, gambling involvement and problem gambling: Evidence from a Swedish population survey. International Gambling Studies, 17, 490���507. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2017.1360928 [DOI: 10.1080/14459795.2017.1360928]
  3. Blaszczynski, A. (2013). A critical examination of the link between gaming machines and gambling-related harm. Journal of Gambling Business & Economics, 7(3), 55���76. https://doi.org/10.5750/jgbe.v7i3.818 [DOI: 10.5750/jgbe.v7i3.818]
  4. Booth, L., Anderson, A. S., White, V., Pierce, H., Moodie, R., & Pettigrew, S. (2021). Public perceptions of harm for nine popular gambling products. Journal of Gambling Studies, 37(4), 1113���1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-021-10014-5 [DOI: 10.1007/s10899-021-10014-5]
  5. Browne, M., & Rockloff, M. J. (2017). The dangers of conflating gambling-related harm with disordered gambling. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 6(3), 317���320. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.6.2017.059 [DOI: 10.1556/2006.6.2017.059]
  6. Browne, M., & Rockloff, M. J. (2018). Prevalence of gambling-related harm provides evidence for the prevention paradox. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7(2), 410���422. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.2018.41 [DOI: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.41]
  7. Chalmers, H., & Willoughby, T. (2006). Do predictors of Gambling involvement differ across male and female adolescent? Journal of Gambling Studies, 22, 373���392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-006-9024-6 [DOI: 10.1007/s10899-006-9024-6]
  8. Chiu, J., & Storm, L. (2010). Personality, perceived luck, and gambling attitudes as predictors of gambling involvement. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 205���227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-009-9160-x [DOI: 10.1007/s10899-009-9160-x]
  9. Chomynov��, P., Dvo����kov��, Z., Galand��k, D., Orl��kov��, B., Grohmannov��, K., ��ern��kov��, T., Frankov��, E., & Roubalov��, M. (2024). Report on Gambling in the Czech Republic 2024 ��� Summary. Prague: National Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Addiction.
  10. Chomynov��, P., Cs��my, L., & Mrav����k, V. (2020). Evropsk�� ��koln�� studie o alkoholu a jin��ch drog��ch (ESPAD) 2019. Zaost��eno, 6, 1���20.
  11. Chomynov��, P., Dvo����kov��, Z., Grohmannov��, K., Orl��kov��, B., ��ern��kov��, T., Frankov��, E., & Petro��, O. (2023). Report on Gambling in the Czech Republic 2023 ��� Summary. National Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Addiction.
  12. Czech Television. (2024). Mapping gambling in society [TV report]. Ud��losti v regionech. Retrieved September 15, 2024, from https://www.ceskatelevize.cz/porady/10122978233-udalosti-v-regionech-ostrava/424231100030911/
  13. CZSO. (2023). Vzd��lanostn�� struktura obyvatelstva. Ve��ejn�� datab��ze. Retrieved from https://vdb.czso.cz/vdbvo2/faces/cs/index.jsf?page=statistiky#katalog=30845
  14. Delfabbro, P., & King, D. L. (2019). Challenges in the Conceptualisation and Measurement of Gambling-Related Harm. Journal of Gambling Studies, 35(3), 743���755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-019-09844-1 [DOI: 10.1007/s10899-019-09844-1]
  15. Delfabbro, P., King, D. L., Browne, M., & Dowling, N. A. (2020). Do EGMs have a stronger association with problem gambling than racing and casino table games? Evidence from a decade of Australian prevalence studies. Journal of Gambling Studies, 36, 499���511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-020-09950-5 [DOI: 10.1007/s10899-020-09950-5]
  16. Dowling, N. A., Merkouris, S. S., Dias, S., Rodda, S. N., Manning, V., Youssef, G. J., Lubman, D. I., & Volberg, R. A. (2019). The diagnostic accuracy of brief screening instruments for problem gambling: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101784 [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101784]
  17. Dowling, N. A., Merkouris, S. S., Greenwood, C. J., Oldenhof, E., Toumbourou, J. W., & Youssef, G. J. (2017). Early risk and protective factors for problem gambling: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 51, 109���124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2016.10.008 [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.10.008]
  18. EFPA (2005). Meta-code of ethics. European Federation of Psychologists' Associations (EFPA). Retrieved from https://www.efpa.eu/meta-code-ethics .
  19. Engeb��, J., Torsheim, T., & Pallesen, S. (2021). Regulatory measures��� effect on gambling participation: Experiences from Norway. Frontiers Psychiatry, 1, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.672471 [DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.672471]
  20. Fiedor, D., Kr��l, O., Frajer, J., ��er��, M., & Szczyrba, Z. (2019a). What do residents consider to be gambling and what are their attitudes towards it? Evidence from the Czech Republic. Journal of Gambling Studies, 35, 1347���1360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-018-9804-9 [DOI: 10.1007/s10899-018-9804-9]
  21. Fiedor, D., ��er��, M., Frajer, J., & Szczyrba, Z. (2019b). Attitudes of mayors towards gambling: Evidence from the Czech Republic. Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 17(1), 1���21. https://doi.org/10.4335/10.4335/17.1.1-21(2019) [DOI: 10.4335/10.4335/17.1.1-21(2019)]
  22. Fiedor, D., Szczyrba, Z., ��er��, M., Smolov��, I., & Tou��ek, V. (2017). The spatial distribution of gambling and its economic benefits to municipalities in the Czech Republic. Moravian Geographical Reports, 25(2), 104���117. https://doi.org/10.1515/mgr-2017-0010 [DOI: 10.1515/mgr-2017-0010]
  23. Frajer, J., Fiedor, D., Kova����k, F., ��er��, M., Aigelov��, E., & Charv��t, M. (2024). Changing ���casinoscape���: Spatial pattern of the casino municipalities and impacts of new gambling act in the Czech Republic. Journal of Maps. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2024.2387921 [DOI: 10.1080/17445647.2024.2387921]
  24. Gainsbury, S. (2015). Online gambling addiction: The relationship between internet gambling and disordered gambling. Current Addiction Reports, 2, 185���193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-015-0057-8 [DOI: 10.1007/s40429-015-0057-8]
  25. Gavriel-Fried, B., Delfabbro, P., Ricijas, N., Dodig Hundric, D., & Derevensky, J. L. (2023). Cross-national comparisons of the prevalence of gambling, problem gambling in young people and the role of accessibility in higher risk gambling: A study of Australia, Canada, Croatia and Israel. Current Psychology, 42, 6990���7001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02017-7 [DOI: 10.1007/s12144-021-02017-7]
  26. Ghelfi, M., Scattola, P., Giudici, G., & Velasco, V. (2024). Online gambling: A systematic review of risk and protective factors in the adult population. Journal of Gambling Studies, 40(2), 673���699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-023-10258-3 [DOI: 10.1007/s10899-023-10258-3]
  27. Golino, H., & Christensen, A. P. (2024). EGAnet: Exploratory Graph Analysis���A framework for estimating the number of dimensions in multivariate data using network psychometrics. R package version 2.0.5. Retrieved from https://r-ega.net
  28. Gooding, N. B., & Williams, R. J. (2023). Are There riskier types of gambling? Journal of Gambling Studies, 40, 555���569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-023-10231-0 [DOI: 10.1007/s10899-023-10231-0]
  29. Griffiths, M. (2000). Scratchcard gambling among adolescent males. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16(1), 79���91. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009483401308 [DOI: 10.1023/A]
  30. Griffiths, M. (2002). Are lottery scratchcards a ���hard��� form of gambling? Journal of Gambling Issues. https://doi.org/10.4309/jgi.2002.7.8 [DOI: 10.4309/jgi.2002.7.8]
  31. Hancock, L., & Smith, G. (2017). Critiquing the Reno Model I-IV International Influence on Regulators and Governments (2004���2015)���The Distorted Reality of ���Responsible Gambling���. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 15(6), 1151���1176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9746-y [DOI: 10.1007/s11469-017-9746-y]
  32. Hing, N., Russell, A. M. T., Black, A., Rockloff, M., Browne, M., Rawat, V., Greer, N., Stevens, M., Dowling, N. A., Merkouris, S., King, D. L., Salonen, A. H., Breen, H., & Woo, L. (2022). Gambling prevalence and gambling problems amongst land-based-only, online-only and mixed-mode gamblers in Australia: A national study. Computers in Human Behavior, 132, 107269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107269 [DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107269]
  33. Kundu, P. V., Pilver, C. E., Desai, R. A., Steinberg, M. A., Rugle, L., Krishnan-Sarin, S., & Potenza, M. N. (2013). Gambling-Related Attitudes and Behaviors in Adolescents Having Received Instant (Scratch) Lottery Tickets as Gifts. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52, 456���464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.07.013 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.07.013]
  34. Latvala, T., Lintonen, T., & Konu, A. (2019). Public health effects of gambling���debate on a conceptual model. BMC Public Health, 19, 1���16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7391-z [DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7391-z]
  35. Lerkkanen, T., Egerer, M., Alanko, A., J��rvinen-Tassopoulos, J., & Hellman, M. (2020). Citizens��� Perceptions of Gambling Regulation Systems: A New Meaning-Based Approach. Journal of Gambling Issues, 43, https://doi.org/10.4309/jgi.2020.43.6
  36. Livingstone, C., & Rintoul, A. (2020). Moving on from responsible gambling: A new discourse is needed to prevent and minimise harm from gambling. Public Health, 184, 107���112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2020.03.018 [DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.03.018]
  37. Maierov��, E., Charv��t, M., & Miovsk��, M. (2014). Pr��b��h a n��sledky hr����sk��ch kari��r u mu��sk��ch pacient�� hospitalizovan��ch v psychiatrick��ch nemocnic��ch pro diagn��zu F 63.0 patologick�� hr����stv��. ��esk�� a Slovensk�� Psychiatrie, 110(6).
  38. Marionneau, V., Selin, J., Impinen, A., & Roukka, T. (2024). Availability restrictions and mandatory precommitment in land-based gambling: effects on online substitutes and total consumption in longitudinal sales data. BMC Public Health, 24(809), https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18325-z
  39. Maur��cio, D., & Rodrigues-Silva, N. (2023). The scratch card gambler: A hidden reality. Journal of Gambling Studies, 39, 1099���1110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-022-10136-4 [DOI: 10.1007/s10899-022-10136-4]
  40. Mazar, A., Zorn, M., Becker, N., & Volberg, R. A. (2020). Gambling formats, involvement, and problem gambling: Which types of gambling are more risky? BMC Public Health, 20, 1���10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08822-2 [DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-08822-2]
  41. McCarthy, S., Thomas, S. L., Randle, M., Bestman, A., Pitt, H., Cowlishaw, S., & Daube, M. (2018). Women���s gambling behaviour, product preferences, and perceptions of product harm: Differences by age and gambling risk status. Harm Reduction Journal. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-018-0227-9 [DOI: 10.1186/s12954-018-0227-9]
  42. Meyer, G., Fiebig, M., H��feli, J., & M��rsen, C. (2011). Development of an assessment tool to evaluate the risk potential of different gambling types. International Gambling Studies, 11(2), 221���236. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2011.584890 [DOI: 10.1080/14459795.2011.584890]
  43. Mokinaro, S., Vincente, J., Benedetti, E., Cerrai, S., Colasante, E., Arpa, S., Chomynova, P., Kraus, L., Monshouwer, K., Spika, S., & Arnarsson, A. M. (2020). ESPAD report 2019: Results from European school survey project on alcohol and other drugs. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2810/877033 [DOI: 10.2810/877033]
  44. Mrav����k, V., Chomynov��, P., Grohmannov��, K., & Rous, Z. (2020). Gambling products and their risk potential for gambling disorder. ��asopis L��ka���� ��esk��ch, 159, 196���202. [PMID: 33297707]
  45. Noble, N., Freund, M., Hill, D., White, V., Leigh, L., Lambkin, D., Scully, M., & Sanson-Fisher, R. (2022). Exposure to gambling promotions and gambling behaviours in Australian secondary school students. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 16, 100439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2022.100439 [DOI: 10.1016/j.abrep.2022.100439]
  46. Nower, L., & Blaszczynski, A. (2006). Characteristics and gender differences among self-excluded casino problem gamblers: Missouri data. Journal of Gambling Studies, 22(1), 81���99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-005-9004-2 [DOI: 10.1007/s10899-005-9004-2]
  47. Parke, J., & Griffiths, M. (2006). The psychology of the fruit machine: The role of structural characteristics (revisited). International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 4(2), 151���179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-006-9014-z [DOI: 10.1007/s11469-006-9014-z]
  48. Reith, G., & Dobbie, F. (2012). Gambling careers. A longitudinal, qualitative study of gambling behaviour. Addiction Research & Theory, 21(5), 376���390. [DOI: 10.3109/16066359.2012.731116]
  49. Revelle, W. (2024). Psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research (Version 2.4.3) [Computer software]. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
  50. Rodrigues-Silva, N. (2017). Scratch cards in Portugal: A hidden threat. International Gambling Studies, 17(2), 332���334. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2017.1317355 [DOI: 10.1080/14459795.2017.1317355]
  51. Russell, A. M. T., Browneorcid, M., Hingorcid, N., Rocklofforcid, M., Newallorcid, P., Dowling, N. A., Merkouris, S., King, D. L., Stevens, M., Salonen, A. H., Breen, H., Greer, N., Thorne, H. B., Visintin, T., Rawat, V., & Woo, L. (2023). Electronic gaming machine accessibility and gambling problems: A natural policy experiment. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 12(3), 721���732. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2023.00044 [DOI: 10.1556/2006.2023.00044]
  52. Salonen, A. H., Hellman, M., Latvala, T., & Castr��n, S. (2018). Gambling participation, gambling habits, gambling related harm, and opinions on gambling advertising in Finland in 2016. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 35(3), 215���234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1455072518765875 [DOI: 10.1177/1455072518765875]
  53. Scalese, M., Bastiani, L., Salvadori, S., Gori, M., Lewis, I., Jarre, P., & Molinaro, S. (2016). Association of problem gambling with type of gambling among Italian general population. Journal of Gambling Studies, 32(3), 1017���1026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-015-9579-1 [DOI: 10.1007/s10899-015-9579-1]
  54. Takiguchi, N., Kawanishi, Y., & Samuelsson, E. (2022). Secrecy, self-blame and risks for social exclusion���Family members��� experiences of gambling problems in Japan. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 940397. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.940397 [DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.940397]
  55. Thomas, S. L., Randle, M., Bestman, A., Pitt, H., Bowe, S. J., Cowlishaw, S., & Daube, M. (2017). Public attitudes towards gambling product harm and harm reduction strategies: An online study of 16���88 year olds in Victoria, Australia. Harm Reduction Journal. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-017-0173-y [DOI: 10.1186/s12954-017-0173-y]
  56. Torrance, J., Roderique-Davies, G., Thomas, S. L., Davies, N., & John, B. (2021). ���It���s basically everywhere���: Young adults��� perceptions of gambling advertising in the UK. Health Promotion International, 36, 976���988. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaa126 [DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daaa126]
  57. Volberg, R. A. & Williams, R. J. (2012). Developing a Short Form of the PGSI. Report to the Gambling Commission. Gambling Commission.
  58. Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Wieczorek, W. F., Tidwell, M. C. O., & Parker, J. C. (2004). Risk factors for pathological gambling. Addictive Behaviors, 29(2), 323���335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2003.08.007 [DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2003.08.007]
  59. Wenzel, H. G., & Dahl, A. A. (2009). Female pathological Gamblers���A critical review of the clinical findings. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 7, 190���202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-008-9174-0 [DOI: 10.1007/s11469-008-9174-0]
  60. Williams, R. J., & Volberg, R. A. (2012). Population Assessment of Problem Gambling: Utility and Best Practices. Report prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care.

Grants

  1. JG_2023_003/Univerzita Palack��ho v Olomouci
  2. JG_2023_003/Univerzita Palack��ho v Olomouci
  3. JG_2023_003/Univerzita Palack��ho v Olomouci
  4. JG_2023_003/Univerzita Palack��ho v Olomouci
  5. JG_2023_003/Univerzita Palack��ho v Olomouci
  6. JG_2023_003/Univerzita Palack��ho v Olomouci
Journal Article
Article has an altmetric score of 2

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0gamblingformsGamblingrisklifetimeformlessbasedriskinessperceivedparticipationpointsyearrecentPerceivedencompasseswidevarietyactivitiesstructuralcharacteristicscontributepotentialHoweverliteraturefullyagreelevelscertainstudyclassifyriskysoftpublicperceptionsexaminelinkexperienceproblemprevalencesurveyconductedmodelregionCzechRepublicpost-socialistcountryhighavailabilityN���=���2498respondentstypologylotteriesbettingcasinogamescreatedsimilaritiesLotteriesfrequentlyplayed863%reportingAmongexclusivelyengagelottery-type15percentagewomenmenparticipatedlastgapwidens31 Formsrisky showlowerproportionnon-problemgamblersFurthermoreindividualsgambledwithinpastmonthhigherdevelopingproblemscomparedwhoseexperiencesRiskinessProblemAcrossDifferentFormsGambling:Focus'Soft'ExperienceLotteryPGSIshort-formSoft

Similar Articles

Cited By