OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience
Advanced Search
International urogynecology journal
Dec 30, 2024;

A Systematic Review of the Prevalence of Overactive Bladder in Women with Non-Urinary Tract Endometriosis and the Effect of Endometriosis Surgery on Symptoms of Overactive Bladder.

Francis G Muriithi, Monika Vij, Siddhartha Mukherjee, Simon Emery
Author Information
  1. Francis G Muriithi: Department of Urogynaecology, Singleton Hospital, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, UK. francis.muriithi@wales.nhs.uk.
  2. Monika Vij: Department of Urogynaecology, Singleton Hospital, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, UK.
  3. Siddhartha Mukherjee: Department of Urogynaecology, Singleton Hospital, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, UK.
  4. Simon Emery: Department of Urogynaecology, Singleton Hospital, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, UK.
PMID: 39738854 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-024-06018-5

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Overactive bladder (OAB) is characterised by urinary urgency, with or without incontinence, often accompanied by daytime frequency and nocturia, in the absence of urinary tract infection or other identifiable causes. Population studies estimate the prevalence of OAB at 12.8% (EPIC study), increasing with age, reaching up to 43% after age 40. Endometriosis affects about 10% of women of reproductive age. Both OAB and endometriosis are chronic and negatively impact women's quality of life. They appear to share a common pathophysiology related to central sensitisation. We hypothesised that OAB and endometriosis might co-exist, and surgical excision of endometriosis could alleviate OAB symptoms. We aimed to assess the prevalence of OAB in patients with endometriosis and examine the effect of endometriosis surgery on OAB symptoms.
METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL-Plus identified studies reporting on endometriosis and OAB or overlapping conditions such as interstitial cystitis. Studies on bladder or ureteric endometriosis were excluded.
RESULTS: Six studies (772 participants) were included. The prevalence of OAB in endometriosis patients ranged from 9.4% (Brazil) to 32% (France). OAB diagnosis varied, with tools such as International Consultation of Incontinence Modular Questionnaire on Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Core Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Score, Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, and urodynamics. Surgical outcomes were inconsistent, with no improvement in three studies, equivocal in one, and worsened in another.
CONCLUSION: Overactive bladder and non-urinary tract endometriosis may co-occur in 20.5% of patients, with surgery showing variable effects on OAB symptoms. Further standardised global research is warranted to fill in evidence gaps such as whether pre-operative desensitisation could improve surgical and quality-of-life outcomes.

Keywords

Central sensitization syndrome Endometriosis Outcome Overactive bladder Prevalence

References

  1. Peinado-Molina RA, Hern��ndez-Mart��nez A, Mart��nez-V��zquez S, Rodr��guez-Almagro J, Mart��nez-Galiano JM. Pelvic floor dysfunction: prevalence and associated factors. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):2005. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16901-3 . [DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16901-3]
  2. O���Sullivan ED, Schofield SJ. Cognitive bias in clinical medicine. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2018;48(3):225���32. https://doi.org/10.4997/JRCPE.2018.306 . [DOI: 10.4997/JRCPE.2018.306]
  3. Gabriel I, Vitonis AF, Missmer SA, Fadayomi A, DiVasta AD, Terry KL, et al. Association between endometriosis and lower urinary tract symptoms. Fertil Steril. 2022;117(4):822���30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.01.003 . [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.01.003]
  4. Nackeeran S, Ramasamy R. Endometriosis and lower urinary tract symptoms: association or causation? Fertil Steril. 2022;117(4):831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.01.021 . [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.01.021]
  5. Ackerman AL, Lai HH, Parameshwar PS, Eilber KS, Anger JT. Symptomatic overlap in overactive bladder and interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: development of a new algorithm. BJU Int. 2019;123(4):682���93. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14568 . [DOI: 10.1111/bju.14568]
  6. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4���20. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20798 . [DOI: 10.1002/nau.20798]
  7. Hanno PM, Burks DA, Clemens JQ, Dmochowski RR, Erickson D, Fitzgerald MP, et al. AUA guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. J Urol. 2011;185(6):2162���70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.064 . [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.064]
  8. Alimi Y, Iwanaga J, Loukas M, Tubbs RS. The clinical anatomy of endometriosis: a review. Cureus. 2018;10(9):e3361. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.3361 . [DOI: 10.7759/cureus.3361]
  9. Butrick CW. Patients with chronic pelvic pain: endometriosis or interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome? JSLS. 2007;11(2):182���9. [PMID: 17761077]
  10. Scarneciu I, Lupu S, Bratu OG, Teodorescu A, Maxim LS, Brinza A, et al. Overactive bladder: a review and update. Exp Ther Med. 2021;22(6):1444. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10879 . [DOI: 10.3892/etm.2021.10879]
  11. Stewart WF, Van Rooyen JB, Cundiff GW, Abrams P, Herzog AR, Corey R, et al. Prevalence and burden of overactive bladder in the United States. World J Urol. 2003;20(6):327���36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-002-0301-4 . [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-002-0301-4]
  12. Eapen RS, Radomski SB. Review of the epidemiology of overactive bladder. Res Rep Urol. 2016;8:71���6. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S102441 . [DOI: 10.2147/RRU.S102441]
  13. Della Corte L, Di Filippo C, Gabrielli O, Reppuccia S, La Rosa VL, Ragusa R, et al. The burden of endometriosis on women���s lifespan: a narrative overview on quality of life and psychosocial wellbeing. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(13):4683. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134683 . [DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17134683]
  14. Yunus MB. Fibromyalgia and overlapping disorders: the unifying concept of central sensitivity syndromes. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2007;36(6):339���56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2006.12.009 . [DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2006.12.009]
  15. Yunus MB. Central sensitivity syndromes: an overview. J Musculoskelet Pain 2009;17(4):400���8. https://doi.org/10.3109/10582450903284752. [DOI: 10.3109/10582450903284752]
  16. Rathmell JP, Hill B. Wall and Melzack���s textbook of pain, 5th edition. Anesthesia Analgesia 2006;102(6):1914. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ANE.0000220485.92210.D3. [DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000220485.92210.D3]
  17. Basbaum AI, Bautista DM, Scherrer G, Julius D. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of pain. Cell. 2009;139(2):267���84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.09.028 . [DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.09.028]
  18. Knox S, Offiah I, Hashim H. Evaluation of central sensitisation in bladder pain syndrome: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2024;35(6):1109���18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05793-5 . [DOI: 10.1007/s00192-024-05793-5]
  19. Latremoliere A, Woolf CJ. Central sensitization: a generator of pain hypersensitivity by central neural plasticity. J Pain. 2009;10(9):895���926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2009.06.012 . [DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.06.012]
  20. Levesque A, Riant T, Ploteau S, Rigaud J, Labat JJ; Convergences PP Network. Clinical criteria of central sensitization in chronic pelvic and perineal pain (Convergences PP Criteria): elaboration of a clinical evaluation tool based on formal expert consensus. Pain Med. 2018;19(10):2009���15. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pny030 . [DOI: 10.1093/pm/pny030]
  21. Nijs J, George SZ, Clauw DJ, Fern��ndez-de-Las-Pe��as C, Kosek E, Ickmans K, et al. Central sensitisation in chronic pain conditions: latest discoveries and their potential for precision medicine. Lancet Rheumatol. 2021;3(5):e383���92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(21)00032-1 . [DOI: 10.1016/S2665-9913(21)00032-1]
  22. McNamara HC, Frawley HC, Donoghue JF, Readman E, Healey M, Ellett L, et al. Peripheral, central, and cross sensitization in endometriosis-associated pain and comorbid pain syndromes. Front Reprod Health. 2021;3: 729642. https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2021.729642 . [DOI: 10.3389/frph.2021.729642]
  23. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, G��tzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 . [DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100]
  24. Francis G, Muriithi MV, Sid Mukherjee, Simon Emery. A systematic review of the prevalence of overactive bladder in women with non-urinary tract endometriosis and the effect of endometriosis surgery on symptoms of overactive bladder. PROSPERO. 2024;CRD42024511682. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=511682
  25. The EndNote Team. EndNote. 20th ed. Philadelphia: Clarivate; 2013.
  26. Covidence. Melbourne, Australia 2021. Available from:  https://www.covidence.org/ . Accessed 22 Jan 2024.
  27. Wells G, Shea B, O���Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale cohort studies. University of Ottawa. 2014.
  28. Campbell M, McKenzie JE, Sowden A, Katikireddi SV, Brennan SE, Ellis S, et al. Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline. BMJ. 2020;368: l6890. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6890 . [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l6890]
  29. Nguyen K, McCormack L, Deans R, Nesbitt-Hawes E, Knapman B, Li F, et al. A prospective study of bladder function following endometriosis surgery with up to eight years follow-up. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2024;31(3):205���12.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2023.11.020 . [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2023.11.020]
  30. Ballester M, Dubernard G, Wafo E, Bellon L, Amarenco G, Belghiti J, et al. Evaluation of urinary dysfunction by urodynamic tests, electromyography and quality of life questionnaire before and after surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;179:135���40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.05.041 . [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.05.041]
  31. Spagnolo E, Zannoni L, Raimondo D, Ferrini G, Mabrouk M, Benfenati A, et al. Urodynamic evaluation and anorectal manometry pre- and post-operative bowel shaving surgical procedure for posterior deep infiltrating endometriosis: a pilot study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(6):1080���5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2014.05.012 . [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.05.012]
  32. Michalak KA, Cameron-Jeffs R, Yen AHF, Fernandes HM, Shedda SM, Chen FC, et al. Impact of bowel endometriosis surgery on bowel and bladder function, pain symptoms and quality of life. J Endometr Pelvic Pain Disord. 2016;8(2):55���61. https://doi.org/10.5301/je.5000244 . [DOI: 10.5301/je.5000244]
  33. De Resende Jr JAD, Crispi CP, Cardeman L, Buere RT, Fonseca MF. Urodynamic observations and lower urinary tract symptoms associated with endometriosis: a prospective cross-sectional observational study assessing women with deep infiltrating disease. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(9):1349���58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3531-0 . [DOI: 10.1007/s00192-017-3531-0]
  34. Dior UP, Reddington C, Cheng C, Levin G, Healey M. Urinary function after surgery for deep endometriosis: a prospective study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022;29(2):308���16.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2021.08.024 . [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.08.024]
  35. Scherer RW, Saldanha IJ. How should systematic reviewers handle conference abstracts? A view from the trenches. Syst Rev. 2019;8(1):264. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1188-0 . [DOI: 10.1186/s13643-019-1188-0]
  36. Dagi AF, Parry GJ, Labow BI, Taghinia AH. Discrepancies between conference abstracts and published manuscripts in plastic surgery studies: a retrospective review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021;9(9):e3828. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003828 . [DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003828]
  37. Hackenbroich S, Kranke P, Meybohm P, Weibel S. Include or not to include conference abstracts in systematic reviews? Lessons learned from a large Cochrane network meta-analysis including 585 trials. Syst Rev. 2022;11(1):178. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02048-6 . [DOI: 10.1186/s13643-022-02048-6]
  38. Benoit L, Dabi Y, Bazot M, Thomassin-Naggara I, Ferrier C, Puchar A, et al. Parametrial endometriosis: a predictive and prognostic factor for voiding dysfunction and complications. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022;276:236���43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.07.035 . [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.07.035]
  39. Vesale E, Roman H, Moawad G, Benoit L, Touboul C, Darai E, et al. Voiding dysfunction after colorectal surgery for endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(7):1490���502.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.019 . [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.019]
  40. De Carvalho MSR, Pellino G, Pereira AMG, Bray-Beraldo F, Lopes RGC, Di Saverio S. Prevalence of urinary dysfunction after minimally invasive surgery for deep rectosigmoid endometriosis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023;408(1):83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-02831-6 . [DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02831-6]
  41. Leopold B, Klebanoff JS, Bendifallah S, Ayoubi JM, Soares T, Rahman S, et al. A narrative review of functional outcomes following nerve-sparing surgery for deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig. 2021;43(2):123���6. https://doi.org/10.1515/hmbci-2020-0064 . [DOI: 10.1515/hmbci-2020-0064]
  42. Bosch JL, Norton P, Jones JS. Should we screen for and treat lower urinary tract dysfunction after major pelvic surgery? ICI-RS 2011. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012;31(3):327���9. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22218 . [DOI: 10.1002/nau.22218]
  43. Bonneau C, Zilberman S, Ballester M, Thomin A, Thomassin-Naggara I, Bazot M, et al. Incidence of pre- and postoperative urinary dysfunction associated with deep infiltrating endometriosis: relevance of urodynamic tests and therapeutic implications. Minerva Ginecol. 2013;65(4):385���405. [PMID: 24051939]
  44. Farias JC, Nascimento MDDSB, Leal PDC, Oliveira CMB, Moura ECR. Impact of deep resection of endometriosis in the pelvis on urodynamic parameters. Acta Cir Bras. 2023;38:e386323. https://doi.org/10.1590/acb386323 . [DOI: 10.1590/acb386323]
  45. Orr NL, Huang AJ, Liu YD, Noga H, Bedaiwy MA, Williams C, et al. Association of central sensitization inventory scores with pain outcomes after endometriosis surgery. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(2):e230780. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0780 . [DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0780]
  46. Nijs J, Leysen L, Vanlauwe J, Logghe T, Ickmans K, Polli A, et al. Treatment of central sensitization in patients with chronic pain: time for change? Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2019;20(16):1961���70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2019.1647166 . [DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1647166]
  47. Nijs J, Malfliet A, Ickmans K, Baert I, Meeus M. Treatment of central sensitization in patients with ���unexplained��� chronic pain: an update. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2014;15(12):1671���83. https://doi.org/10.1517/14656566.2014.925446 . [DOI: 10.1517/14656566.2014.925446]
Journal Article Review
Article has an altmetric score of 17

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0OABendometriosisOveractivebladderstudiesEndometriosisTractprevalenceagesymptomspatientsLowerUrinarySymptomsurinarytractsurgicalsurgeryFemaleoutcomesPrevalenceBladderINTRODUCTIONANDHYPOTHESIS:characterisedurgencywithoutincontinenceoftenaccompanieddaytimefrequencynocturiaabsenceinfectionidentifiablecausesPopulationestimate128%EPICstudyincreasingreaching43%40affects10%womenreproductivechronicnegativelyimpactwomen'squalitylifeappearsharecommonpathophysiologyrelatedcentralsensitisationhypothesisedmightco-existexcisionalleviateaimedassessexamineeffectMETHODS:systematicsearchMEDLINEPubMedEmbaseCINAHL-PlusidentifiedreportingoverlappingconditionsinterstitialcystitisStudiesuretericexcludedRESULTS:Six772participantsincludedranged94%Brazil32%FrancediagnosisvariedtoolsInternationalConsultationIncontinenceModularQuestionnaireCoreSymptomScoreBristolurodynamicsSurgicalinconsistentimprovementthreeequivocaloneworsenedanotherCONCLUSION:non-urinarymayco-occur205%showingvariableeffectsstandardisedglobalresearchwarrantedfillevidencegapswhetherpre-operativedesensitisationimprovequality-of-lifeSystematicReviewWomenNon-UrinaryEffectSurgeryCentralsensitizationsyndromeOutcome

Similar Articles

Cited By