Ethical Considerations for Conducting Community-Engaged Research with Women Experiencing Homelessness and Incarcerated Women.

Kirsten Dickins
Author Information
  1. Kirsten Dickins: Investigator at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) at the National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) in the Division of Intramural Research.

Abstract

Since 1979, The Belmont Report has served as a guidebook for ensuring that basic standards for ethical research are upheld. The Belmont Report calls for special protections of vulnerable research participants, such as people who are incarcerated and economically and educationally disadvantaged individuals who are deemed susceptible to exploitation. With a growing focus on health equity and community-engaged approaches in health equity research, efforts to involve vulnerable participants are increasing. Yet there is little understanding of what matters most to vulnerable populations. This study sought to understand, from participant perspectives, ethical considerations when conducting research with two vulnerable populations: women experiencing homelessness and women who are incarcerated. Health care professionals and staff that work closely with homeless and incarcerated populations were also interviewed. The findings from semistructured interviews with these populations underscore the sustained importance of respect for persons, beneficence, and justice, and further highlight the need for self-determination; privacy/confidentiality; continuous consent; fair treatment; benefit-burden balance; nonauthoritarian relationships; and fair access to research participation. Although The Belmont Report durably serves to ethically guide standard conventional research, the Report's original concepts should be extended to include specific considerations when vulnerable populations are involved in community-engaged research.

Keywords

References

  1. ���Healthy People 2030,��� Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, November 7, 2024, https://health.gov/healthypeople.
  2. Coughlin, S. S., S. R. Lewis, and S. A. Smith, ���Ethical and Social Issues in Health Research Involving Incarcerated People,��� Journal of Healthcare for the Poor and Underserved 27, no. 2A (2016): 18���28.
  3. Benbow, S., et al., ���Conducting Research with Criminalized Women in an Incarcerated Setting: The Researcher's Perspective,��� Canadian Journal of Nursing Research 45, no. 3 (2013): 80���91.
  4. Friesen, P., et al., ���Rethinking The Belmont Report?,��� American Journal of Bioethics 17, no. 7 (2017): 15���21.
  5. Jeste, D. V., et al., ���A New Brief Instrument for Assessing Decisional Capacity for Clinical Research,��� Archives of General Psychiatry 64, no. 8 (2007): 966���74.
  6. Dickins, K. A., ���Improving Traumatic Stress with Justice-Impacted Women and Women Experiencing Homelessness: A Pilot Study of Narrative Exposure Therapy,��� Issues in Mental Health Nursing 45, no. 2 (2024): 121���41.
  7. Bolatito, L. A., ���Autonomy and Interdependence: Quandaries in Research Ethics,��� Health 4, no. 4 (2012): 173���84.
  8. Nagai, H., E. Nakazawa, and A. Akabayashi, ���The Creation of The Belmont Report and Its Effect on Ethical Principles: A Historical Study,��� Monash Bioethics Review 40, no. 2 (2022): 157���70.
  9. Idris, I. B., et al., ���Women's Autonomy in Healthcare Decision Making: A Systematic Review,��� BMC Women's Health 23 (2023): doi:10.1186/s12905-023-02792-4.
  10. Osamor, P. E., and C. Grady, ���Autonomy and Couples��� Joint Decision-Making in Healthcare,��� BMC Medical Ethics 19 (2018): doi:10.1186/s12910-017-0241-6.
  11. Osamor, P. E., and C. Grady, ���Women's Autonomy in Health Care Decision-Making in Developing Countries: A Synthesis of the Literature,��� International Journal of Women's Health 8 (2016): 191���202.
  12. Bolatito, ���Autonomy and Interdependence���; Beauchamp, T. L., and J. F. Childress, Principles of Biomedical Ethics (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2001).
  13. Ingel, S., et al., ���Privacy Violations and Procedural Justice in the United States Prisons and Jails,��� Sociology Compass 15, no. 2 (2021): doi:10.1111/soc4.12847.
  14. Allmark, P., and S. Mason, ���Improving the Quality of Consent to Randomised Controlled Trials by Using Continuous Consent and Clinician Training in the Consent Process,��� Journal of Medical Ethics 32, no. 8 (2006): 439���43.
  15. Nusbaum, L., et al., ���Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study,��� Global Qualitative Nursing Research 4 (2017): doi:10.1177/2333393617732017.
  16. Umamaheswar, J., ���Studying Homeless and Incarcerated Persons: A Comparative Account of Doing Field Research with Hard-to-Reach Populations,��� Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 19, no. 3 (2018): 1���22.
  17. Western, B., ���Inside the Box: Safety, Health, and Isolation in Prison,��� Journal of Economic Perspectives 35, no. 4 (2021): 97���122; Ortiz, K., et al., ���Partnerships, Processes, and Outcomes: A Health Equity-Focused Scoping Meta-Review of Community-Engaged Scholarship,��� Annual Review of Public Health 41 (2020): 177-99.
  18. Shaw and Elger, ���Improving Public Health by Respecting Autonomy���; National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979).
  19. Osganian, A. L., ���Limitations on Biomedical and Behavioral Research Involving Prisoners: An Argument Supporting the Institute of Medicine's Recommendations to Revise Regulations,��� New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement 34 (2008): 429.
  20. Bracken-Roche, D., et al., ���The Concept of ���Vulnerability��� in Research Ethics: An In-Depth Analysis of Policies and Guidelines,��� Health Research Policy and Systems 15 (2017): doi:10.1186/s12961-016-0164-6.
  21. Waegemakers Schiff, J., and A. M. Lane, ���PTSD Symptoms, Vicarious Traumatization, and Burnout in Front Line Workers in the Homeless Sector,��� Community Mental Health Journal 55, no. 3 (2019): 454���62; Frost, L., and H. Scott, ���What Is Known about the Secondary Traumatization of Staff Working with Offending Populations? A Review of the Literature,��� Traumatology 28, no. 1 (2022): 56-73.
  22. Choi, K., et al., ���Community Health Worker Perspectives on Engaging Unhoused Peer Ambassadors for COVID-19 Vaccine Outreach in Homeless Encampments and Shelters,��� Journal of General Internal Medicine 37, no. 8 (2022): 2026���32; R��heim, M., et al., ���Researcher-Researched Relationship in Qualitative Research: Shifts in Positions and Researcher Vulnerability,��� International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being 11, no. 1 (2016): doi:10.3402/qhw.v11.30996.
  23. Franco, A., J. Meldrum, and C. Ngaruiya, ���Identifying Homeless Population Needs in the Emergency Department using Community-Based Participatory Research,��� BMC Health Services Research 21, no. 1 (2021): doi:10.1186/s12913-021-06426-z.
  24. Ryan, V. M., ���Review of Belmont Revisited: Ethical Principles for Research with Human Subjects,��� Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 27, no. 1 (2007): 316���18.
  25. Mollard, E., H. Hatton-Bowers, and J. Tippens, ���Finding Strength in Vulnerability: Ethical Approaches When Conducting Research with Vulnerable Populations,��� Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health 65, no. 6 (2020): 802���7.
  26. Mongelli, F., P. Georgakopoulos, and M. T. Pato, ���Challenges and Opportunities to Meet the Mental Health Needs of Underserved and Disenfranchised Populations in the United States,��� Focus 18, no. 1 (2020): 16���24.
  27. Shaw and Elger, ���Improving Public Health by Respecting Autonomy���; Edge, C., et al., ���Secondary Care Clinicians and Staff Have a Key Role in Delivering Equivalence of Care for Prisoners: A Qualitative Study of Prisoners��� Experiences,��� eClinicalMedicine 24 (2020): doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100416.
  28. Barrow, Brannan, and Khandhar, ���Research Ethics.���
  29. Mastroianni, A. C., R. Faden, and D. Federman, eds., Women and Health Research, vol. 1 (Washington, DC: The National Academies Press 1994).
  30. Berecki-Gisolf, J., et al., ���Angina Symptoms Are Associated with Mortality in Older Women with Ischemic Heart Disease,��� Circulation 120 (2009): 2330���36.
  31. Vogt, D., ���Research on Women, Trauma and PTSD,��� U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, PTSD: National Center for PTSD, February 2, 2023, http://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/treat/specific/ptsd_research_women.asp.
  32. Friesen et al., ���Rethinking The Belmont Report?���
  33. Ibid.
  34. Coughlin, Lewis, and Smith, ���Ethical and Social Issues in Health Research Involving Incarcerated People.���
  35. Bracken-Roche et al., ���The Concept of ���Vulnerability��� in Research Ethics.���
  36. Smith, L. J., ���How Ethical Is Ethical Research? Recruiting Marginalized, Vulnerable Groups into Health Services Research,��� Journal of Advanced Nursing 62, no. 2 (2008): 248���57.
  37. Ojo-Fati, O., et al., ���Practical Issues Regarding Implementing a Randomized Clinical Trial in a Homeless Population: Strategies and Lessons Learned,��� Trials 18 (2017): doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2046-9.
  38. Smith, ���How Ethical Is Ethical Research?���

Grants

  1. /NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
Ill-Housed Persons
Female
Vulnerable Populations
Prisoners
Informed Consent
Ethics, Research
Community-Based Participatory Research
Research Subjects
Confidentiality
Adult
Personal Autonomy
Respect
Beneficence
Privacy
Middle Aged
Social Justice

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By