Understanding parental choices related to infant sleep practices in the United States using a mixed methods approach.

Hannah Sahud, Rachel P Berger, Megan Hamm, Emily Heineman, Flor Cameron, Julia Wasilewski, Ashley Griffin, Gysella B Muniz
Author Information
  1. Hannah Sahud: School of Medicine, Division of Child Advocacy, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, 4401 Penn Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA.
  2. Rachel P Berger: School of Medicine, Division of Child Advocacy, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, 4401 Penn Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA. rachel.berger@chp.edu.
  3. Megan Hamm: University of Pittsburgh Center for Research On Health Care, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  4. Emily Heineman: School of Medicine, Division of Child Advocacy, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, 4401 Penn Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA.
  5. Flor Cameron: University of Pittsburgh Center for Research On Health Care, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  6. Julia Wasilewski: University of Pittsburgh Center for Research On Health Care, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  7. Ashley Griffin: School of Medicine, Division of General Academic Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  8. Gysella B Muniz: School of Medicine, Division of General Academic Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to gather information about parental practices, knowledge, and attitudes regarding infant sleep habits and environments, among families who practice non-recommended sleep practices.
METHODS: We conducted one-on-one phone interviews with parents who had practiced non-recommended sleep methods with their infant and had or had not experienced an undesirable sleep event such as a fall. Interviews were recorded and coded with MAXQDA software. Intercoder reliability was assessed for consistency.
RESULTS: Thirty-one parents consented, and 21 interviews were conducted. Parents were aware of current American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) sleep recommendations for infants, knew about the sleep risks of non-recommended practices and had access to a recommended sleep environment. Parents reported developing modifications to the sleep environment which they perceived made their infant's sleep safer. Many parents felt that they could not be honest with their primary care provider about utilizing a non-recommended sleep environment; many had not had a detailed conversation with their primary care provider about safe sleep.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data are consistent with previous studies which demonstrate that lack of access to a recommended sleep space or lack of knowledge about AAP sleep guidelines are not the primary reasons for practicing non-recommended sleep habits. Our data highlights the disconnect between the current AAP safe sleep recommendations and what parents feel is feasible to do on a daily basis. Evaluating the impact of a risk elimination strategy which is used in the US compared with a risk mitigation strategy which is used in other countries on parental practice and ability to communicate honestly with primary care providers is a future area of research.

Keywords

References

  1. J Pediatr. 2016 Jul;174:78-83.e2 [PMID: 27113377]
  2. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2020 Jan;25(1):e12277 [PMID: 31742922]
  3. Acta Paediatr. 2021 Nov;110(11):3083-3093 [PMID: 34297875]
  4. J Paediatr Child Health. 2017 Aug;53(8):754-760 [PMID: 28653434]
  5. Res Nurs Health. 2000 Aug;23(4):334-40 [PMID: 10940958]
  6. J Community Health. 2018 Jun;43(3):534-542 [PMID: 29188464]
  7. J Paediatr Child Health. 1996 Aug;32(4):310-5 [PMID: 8844536]
  8. Nurse Res. 2014 Mar;21(4):32-7 [PMID: 24673351]
  9. Matern Child Health J. 2015 Mar;19(3):675-90 [PMID: 24985697]
  10. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2021 Feb 24;5(1):e000972 [PMID: 33718628]
  11. PLoS One. 2020 Sep 2;15(9):e0237755 [PMID: 32877412]
  12. J Community Health. 2018 Oct;43(5):977-985 [PMID: 29637434]
  13. Matern Child Health J. 2022 May;26(5):1059-1066 [PMID: 34988864]
  14. BMC Pediatr. 2020 Jan 21;20(1):27 [PMID: 31964354]
  15. Pediatrics. 2006 Aug;118(2):e243-50 [PMID: 16882769]
  16. Pediatrics. 2018 Mar;141(3): [PMID: 29440504]
  17. J Psychiatr Res. 2020 Nov;130:441-446 [PMID: 32905958]
  18. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 30;22(7):e18474 [PMID: 32729842]
  19. J Paediatr Child Health. 2023 Feb;59(2):253-257 [PMID: 36367052]
  20. Health Promot Pract. 2024 Mar;25(2):196-203 [PMID: 36367280]
  21. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57 [PMID: 17872937]
  22. Injury. 2016 Jan;47(1):188-91 [PMID: 26384660]
  23. Mil Med. 2012 Feb;177(2):235-9 [PMID: 22360073]
  24. Child Abuse Negl. 2024 May;151:106716 [PMID: 38531245]
  25. J Community Health. 2015 Feb;40(1):12-9 [PMID: 24859736]
  26. J Pediatr. 2019 Sep;212:151-158.e2 [PMID: 31201032]
  27. Children (Basel). 2021 Sep 14;8(9): [PMID: 34572235]
  28. Pediatrics. 2018 Mar;141(3): [PMID: 29440503]
  29. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2018 Jan/Feb;43(1):32-37 [PMID: 29045245]
  30. Pediatrics. 2022 Jul 1;150(1): [PMID: 35726558]
  31. Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jan;269:113585 [PMID: 33333376]
  32. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2019 May;45(5):337-347 [PMID: 31103475]

MeSH Term

Humans
Parents
Infant
United States
Female
Male
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Sleep
Adult
Infant Care
Choice Behavior
Interviews as Topic
Sudden Infant Death

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0sleepnon-recommendedpracticesinfantparentsprimaryparentalAAPenvironmentcareknowledgehabitspracticeconductedinterviewsmethodseventParentscurrentrecommendationsaccessrecommendedprovidersafedatalackriskstrategyusedBACKGROUND:studyaimedgatherinformationattitudesregardingenvironmentsamongfamiliesMETHODS:one-on-onephonepracticedexperiencedundesirablefallInterviewsrecordedcodedMAXQDAsoftwareIntercoderreliabilityassessedconsistencyRESULTS:Thirty-oneconsented21awareAmericanAcademyPediatricsinfantsknewrisksreporteddevelopingmodificationsperceivedmadeinfant'ssaferManyfelthonestutilizingmanydetailedconversationCONCLUSIONS:consistentpreviousstudiesdemonstratespaceguidelinesreasonspracticing OurhighlightsdisconnectfeelfeasibledailybasisEvaluatingimpacteliminationUScomparedmitigationcountriesabilitycommunicatehonestlyprovidersfuturearearesearchUnderstandingchoicesrelatedUnitedStatesusingmixedapproachSleep-relatedSuddenunexpecteddeath

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.