Individual differences in temporal order judgment.

Leah Fostick, Moti Zwilling, Harvey Babkoff
Author Information
  1. Leah Fostick: Department of Communication Disorders, Auditory Perception Lab in the Name of Laurent Levy, Ariel University, 40700, Ariel, Israel. leah.fostick@ariel.ac.il.
  2. Moti Zwilling: Department of Economics and Business Administration, Ariel University, 40700, Ariel, Israel.
  3. Harvey Babkoff: Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, 5290002, Ramat-Gan, Israel.

Abstract

Large individual differences can be observed in studies reporting spectral TOJ. In the present study, we aimed to explore these individual differences and explain them by employing Warren and Ackroff (1976) framework of direct identification of components and their order (direct ICO) and holistic pattern recognition (HPR). In Experiment 1, results from 177 participants replicated the large variance in participants' performance and suggested three response patterns, validated using the K-Means clustering algorithm. In Experiment 2, the introduction of three tone-pairs to 90 participants, as opposed to a single pair, markedly decreased the propensity of participants to utilize HPR. Experiment 3 assessed 85 participants and demonstrated that diotic presentations significantly reduced the prevalence of HPR utilization. These results confirmed that direct ICO is used mainly when stimuli are difficult to group, and when grouping is possible, HPR is used. The results also show that these strategies are flexible and change according to the experimental manipulation. Spectral TOJ provides an opportunity to observe individual differences in auditory perception and facilitates the investigation of the diverse psychoacoustic cues underlying its performance.

Keywords

References

  1. Cognition. 2013 Dec;129(3):579-85 [PMID: 24060605]
  2. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Jul 12;60(7):2124-2128 [PMID: 28672285]
  3. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Feb;183:19-28 [PMID: 29304447]
  4. Exp Psychol. 2013;60(6):432-43 [PMID: 23820944]
  5. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2013;24(3):191-9 [PMID: 24006326]
  6. J Sleep Res. 2005 Mar;14(1):7-15 [PMID: 15743328]
  7. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Jun 1;57(3):1078-88 [PMID: 24167240]
  8. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;894:1-8 [PMID: 27080640]
  9. J Exp Psychol. 1961 Nov;62:423-32 [PMID: 13907740]
  10. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2005;23(5-6):281-96 [PMID: 16477090]
  11. Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(5):714-23 [PMID: 15721184]
  12. Eur J Ageing. 2019 Apr 13;16(4):481-489 [PMID: 31798372]
  13. Psych J. 2023 Aug;12(4):491-499 [PMID: 36137943]
  14. Percept Psychophys. 1993 Jul;54(1):121-6 [PMID: 8351182]
  15. Brain Lang. 2006 Jul;98(1):1-11 [PMID: 16460793]
  16. Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jun 26;22(13): [PMID: 35808327]
  17. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Sep;140(3):2056 [PMID: 27914416]
  18. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2009 Mar;26(2):135-47 [PMID: 18988063]
  19. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2014 Sep;25(3):307-12 [PMID: 25205710]
  20. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Dec;120(6):3907-15 [PMID: 17225418]
  21. Audiol Res. 2011 Mar 23;1(1):e6 [PMID: 26557315]
  22. Brain Lang. 1980 Mar;9(2):182-98 [PMID: 7363063]
  23. Neurosci Lett. 2006 Jul 31;403(1-2):190-4 [PMID: 16750883]
  24. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2014;74(1):98-103 [PMID: 24718048]
  25. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Oct;40(5):1799-1807 [PMID: 25089573]
  26. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 May;127(5):3026-37 [PMID: 21117752]
  27. Behav Processes. 2006 Feb 28;71(2-3):344-52 [PMID: 16413700]
  28. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 May;43(5):1002-1012 [PMID: 28263629]
  29. Neurosci Lett. 1999 Apr 2;264(1-3):168-71 [PMID: 10320041]
  30. J Exp Child Psychol. 1989 Oct;48(2):270-92 [PMID: 2794857]

MeSH Term

Humans
Female
Individuality
Male
Auditory Perception
Adult
Judgment
Young Adult
Acoustic Stimulation

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0differencesHPRparticipantsindividualdirectorderExperimentresultsTOJidentificationICOpatternrecognitionperformancethreeusedIndividualjudgmentLargecanobservedstudiesreportingspectralpresentstudyaimedexploreexplainemployingWarrenAckroff1976frameworkcomponentsholistic1177replicatedlargevarianceparticipants'suggestedresponsepatternsvalidatedusingK-Meansclusteringalgorithm2introductiontone-pairs90opposedsinglepairmarkedlydecreasedpropensityutilize3assessed85demonstrateddioticpresentationssignificantlyreducedprevalenceutilizationconfirmedmainlystimulidifficultgroupgroupingpossiblealsoshowstrategiesflexiblechangeaccordingexperimentalmanipulationSpectralprovidesopportunityobserveauditoryperceptionfacilitatesinvestigationdiversepsychoacousticcuesunderlyingtemporalDirectHolisticTemporal

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.