Do reproductive endocrinology and infertility fellowship websites reflect a commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion?

Jasmine Eliwa, Patricia J Goedecke, Jim Wan, Rachel Weinerman, Joseph Findley, Rebecca Flyckt
Author Information
  1. Jasmine Eliwa: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
  2. Patricia J Goedecke: Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
  3. Jim Wan: Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
  4. Rachel Weinerman: Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Beachwood, Ohio.
  5. Joseph Findley: Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Beachwood, Ohio.
  6. Rebecca Flyckt: Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Beachwood, Ohio.

Abstract

Objective: To characterize the frequency of diversity elements (DEs) in reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) fellowship websites and analyze these elements according to program characteristics.
Design: Forty-nine REI fellowship websites were assessed for 20 DEs that represent programmatic commitments to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Program websites were categorized by the number of discrete DEs featured: low (0-6); moderate (7-13); or high (14-20). Data were analyzed via R statistical software.
Setting: Not applicable.
Patients: Not applicable.
Exposure: Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was the level of DEs featured within REI fellowship websites. The secondary outcome was the association between DEs and program geographic region and accreditation status.
Results: Program websites had a mean of 3 DEs. No program had a high number of DEs. Eighty-four percent of programs were low in DEs, with 16% exhibiting moderate DEs. Within the moderate group, most programs featured photographs of faculty (63%) and fellows (88%), commitment to DEI message (88%), diversity-specific language (88%), DEI webpage (88%), and DEI-related resources/opportunities (100%). In the low group, most programs presented photographs of faculty and fellows (71%). Programs did not feature active recruitment strategies (unconscious bias, holistic application review, DEI statistics, and implicit bias training). Diversity element category was not associated with program location. Programs with "initial accreditation" had the highest mean DEs.
Conclusions: None of the REI fellowship websites demonstrated high levels of DEs. We speculate that by intentionally incorporating DEs into fellowship websites, programs can more effectively recruit underrepresented fellows and enhance the diversity of REI practitioners.

Keywords

References

  1. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009 Aug;19(2):252-6 [PMID: 19712563]
  2. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun 1;140(6):606-609 [PMID: 35550655]
  3. Fertil Steril. 2022 Feb;117(2):421-430 [PMID: 34980431]
  4. Fertil Steril. 2005 Jul;84(1):221-3 [PMID: 16009188]
  5. J Grad Med Educ. 2023 Jun;15(3):316-321 [PMID: 37363686]
  6. J Med Internet Res. 2003 Jul-Sep;5(3):e22 [PMID: 14517113]
  7. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2019;13(5):113-122 [PMID: 31378741]
  8. Fertil Steril. 2006 Apr;85(4):876-81 [PMID: 16580368]
  9. F S Rep. 2021 Oct 07;3(2 Suppl):114-121 [PMID: 35937450]
  10. HSS J. 2022 May;18(2):235-239 [PMID: 35645639]
  11. J Natl Med Assoc. 2019 Aug;111(4):383-392 [PMID: 30765101]
  12. J Surg Educ. 2021 Sep-Oct;78(5):1476-1482 [PMID: 33726949]
  13. Fertil Steril. 2010 Dec;94(7):2587-9 [PMID: 20356585]
  14. Anesth Analg. 2011 Feb;112(2):430-9 [PMID: 21081766]
  15. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Dec 1;100(12):1196-1201 [PMID: 33443852]
  16. J Surg Educ. 2023 Feb;80(2):247-255 [PMID: 36328935]
  17. F S Rep. 2022 Feb 22;3(2 Suppl):29-39 [PMID: 35937441]
  18. J Surg Educ. 2020 Nov - Dec;77(6):e110-e115 [PMID: 32600889]
  19. Cureus. 2022 Sep 19;14(9):e29328 [PMID: 36277535]
  20. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2022 Jun;68(3):180-189 [PMID: 35345953]
  21. JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Apr;18(4):e600-e609 [PMID: 35113736]
  22. Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Jan;12(1):89-92 [PMID: 15635145]
  23. J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Apr;11(2):241-243 [PMID: 31024664]
  24. Acad Radiol. 2021 Oct;28(10):1410-1423 [PMID: 32811713]
  25. Can J Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug;59(4):e350-e356 [PMID: 37369355]
  26. AJOG Glob Rep. 2023 May 28;:100231 [PMID: 37362631]
  27. J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Aug;213(2):294-305 [PMID: 21641834]
  28. Curr Orthop Pract. 2022 May-Jun;33(3):258-263 [PMID: 35685001]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0DEswebsitesfellowshipdiversityREIprogramDEIprograms88%lowmoderatehighapplicablefellowselementsreproductiveendocrinologyinfertilityequityProgramnumberoutcomefeaturedmeangroupphotographsfacultycommitmentProgramsbiasObjective:characterizefrequencyanalyzeaccordingcharacteristicsDesign:Forty-nineassessed20representprogrammaticcommitmentsinclusioncategorizeddiscretefeatured:0-67-1314-20DataanalyzedviaRstatisticalsoftwareSetting:Patients:Exposure:MainOutcomeMeasures:primarylevelwithinsecondaryassociationgeographicregionaccreditationstatusResults:3Eighty-fourpercent16%exhibitingWithin63%messagediversity-specificlanguagewebpageDEI-relatedresources/opportunities100%presented71%featureactiverecruitmentstrategiesunconsciousholisticapplicationreviewstatisticsimplicittrainingDiversityelementcategoryassociatedlocation"initialaccreditation"highestConclusions:Nonedemonstratedlevelsspeculateintentionallyincorporatingcaneffectivelyrecruitunderrepresentedenhancepractitionersreflectinclusion?REIinclusivitywebsite

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.