Effectiveness of TachoSil as Sealant in Lymphatic Leakage of Breast Cancer With Axillary Dissection.

ArshadUllah Khan, Loai Albinsaad, Mohammed Alessa, Alghaydaa Fouad Aldoughan, Ammar Jaafar Alsalem, Noof Khalid Almukhaimar, Abdulrahman Ahmed Alghamdi, Watan Abdulla Alsahlawi, Batool Abdullah Alahmary
Author Information
  1. ArshadUllah Khan: Oncology and Breast Oncoplastic Surgery, AlAhsa Hospital, Al-Ahsa City, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. ORCID
  2. Loai Albinsaad: Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa City, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. ORCID
  3. Mohammed Alessa: Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa City, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. ORCID
  4. Alghaydaa Fouad Aldoughan: College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa City, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. ORCID
  5. Ammar Jaafar Alsalem: College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa City, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. ORCID
  6. Noof Khalid Almukhaimar: College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa City, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. ORCID
  7. Abdulrahman Ahmed Alghamdi: College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa City, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. ORCID
  8. Watan Abdulla Alsahlawi: College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa City, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. ORCID
  9. Batool Abdullah Alahmary: College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa City, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. ORCID

Abstract

This study is aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of TachoSil in controlling lymphatic leakage in breast cancer patients undergoing axillary dissection. By examining its ability to reduce postsurgical lymphatic drainage, the study will assess its impact on complications like seroma formation, recovery time, and overall patient outcomes, including quality of life and reduced healthcare costs. Breast cancer patients treated in the Department of Surgical Oncology at King Abdulaziz Medical City were enrolled to receive either TachoSil or undergo drain placement after axillary dissection. Repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to observe the difference in lymphatic drainage volume over time considering other covariates, such as age, sex, family history, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), and stage. The TachoSil group showed significantly lower lymphatic drainage volumes at 24 h (106.5 ± 11.3) than the control group (141.7 ± 13.0) ( < 0.001). There were no significant differences in lymphatic drainage volume at 3 days ( = 0.176) and 7 days ( = 0.091). However, at 10 days, the TachoSil group exhibited significantly lower lymphatic drainage volume (19.9 ± 6.1) than the control group (44.5 ± 9.2) ( < 0.001). Repeated measures MANOVA showed a statistically significant difference in lymphatic drainage over time, with a moderate effect ( < 0.001). The findings suggest that TachoSil sealant effectively reduces early postoperative lymphatic drainage volume and maintains lower drainage rates up to 10 days following axillary dissection in breast cancer patients. The use of TachoSil sealant may have potential benefits in reducing the incidence of complications associated with lymphatic drainage and improving patient outcomes.

Keywords

References

  1. Am Surg. 2000 Oct;66(10):982-5 [PMID: 11261630]
  2. J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Mar;48(3):689-94 [PMID: 23480936]
  3. Eur Urol. 2007 Oct;52(4):1156-63 [PMID: 17467884]
  4. Am Surg. 1997 Jan;63(1):97-102 [PMID: 8985079]
  5. Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 06;10:841102 [PMID: 35462821]
  6. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 20;(10):CD006823 [PMID: 24158902]
  7. Int J Surg. 2014 Nov;12(11):1210-5 [PMID: 25462702]
  8. World J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec 10;5(5):895-900 [PMID: 25493227]
  9. BMC Cancer. 2014 Aug 30;14:635 [PMID: 25175029]
  10. J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Mar;222(3):261-8 [PMID: 26776356]
  11. Bull Cancer. 2020 Jun;107(6):672-685 [PMID: 31699399]
  12. Breast J. 2003 Sep-Oct;9(5):393-6 [PMID: 12968960]
  13. Front Oncol. 2020 Jul 17;10:1061 [PMID: 32766138]
  14. J Blood Med. 2011;2:31-6 [PMID: 22287861]
  15. Ann Surg. 1999 Aug;230(2):194-201 [PMID: 10450733]
  16. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2006 Apr;36(4):197-206 [PMID: 16684859]
  17. ISRN Surg. 2014 Mar 04;2014:203943 [PMID: 24729902]
  18. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Mar;21(3):802-7 [PMID: 24217790]
  19. Am Surg. 2003 Jan;69(1):77-81 [PMID: 12575787]
  20. Eur Surg Res. 1998;30(6):439-43 [PMID: 9838238]
  21. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Nov 09;58(11): [PMID: 36363574]
  22. Cancers (Basel). 2021 Apr 24;13(9): [PMID: 33923153]
  23. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001 May;67(1):9-14 [PMID: 11518470]
  24. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992 Nov;175(5):450-4 [PMID: 1440175]
  25. Gynecol Oncol. 2015 May;137(2):291-8 [PMID: 25720294]
  26. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Apr;161(2):125-9 [PMID: 22364898]
  27. World J Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec 19;10:275 [PMID: 23253298]
  28. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 Jun;117(3):217-9 [PMID: 22424660]
  29. Ceska Gynekol. 2014 Nov;79(5):388-92 [PMID: 25472458]
  30. Arch Surg. 1990 Mar;125(3):305-7 [PMID: 2306177]
  31. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep;25(9):2632-2640 [PMID: 29948418]
  32. J Surg Oncol. 2000 Apr;73(4):224-7 [PMID: 10797336]
  33. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011 Oct;37(10):829-35 [PMID: 21849243]
  34. Am J Surg. 2014 Nov;208(5):824-830 [PMID: 24881016]
  35. Am J Surg. 2005 Mar;189(3):319-23 [PMID: 15792759]
  36. Int J Surg. 2021 May;89:105950 [PMID: 33887492]
  37. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec;27(13):5286-5295 [PMID: 32564232]
  38. J Surg Oncol. 2001 Dec;78(4):279-80 [PMID: 11745825]
  39. PLoS One. 2015 Nov 06;10(11):e0142271 [PMID: 26544716]
  40. Oncotarget. 2017 Apr 20;8(40):69062-69075 [PMID: 28978181]
  41. Int Surg. 2014 Jul-Aug;99(4):359-63 [PMID: 25058765]
  42. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Nov - Dec;23(7):1083-1087 [PMID: 27478163]
  43. Br J Surg. 2006 Jul;93(7):810-9 [PMID: 16775816]
  44. Breast J. 2000 Jan;6(1):31-33 [PMID: 11348332]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0lymphaticdrainageTachoSil0canceraxillarydissectionvolumegroup±daysbreastpatientstimelower<001sealantstudycomplicationspatientoutcomesBreastRepeatedmeasuresMANOVAdifferenceshowedsignificantly53control7significant=109aimedevaluatingeffectivenesscontrollingleakageundergoingexaminingabilityreducepostsurgicalwillassessimpactlikeseromaformationrecoveryoverallincludingqualitylifereducedhealthcarecoststreatedDepartmentSurgicalOncologyKingAbdulazizMedicalCityenrolledreceiveeitherundergodrainplacementmultivariateanalysisvarianceusedobserveconsideringcovariatesagesexfamilyhistoryneoadjuvantchemotherapyNACstagevolumes24 h1061114113differences176091Howeverexhibited1961442statisticallymoderateeffectfindingssuggesteffectivelyreducesearlypostoperativemaintainsratesfollowingusemaypotentialbenefitsreducingincidenceassociatedimprovingEffectivenessSealantLymphaticLeakageCancerAxillaryDissectionfibrinhemostaticagentlymphocele

Similar Articles

Cited By