Implant-based reconstruction and adjuvant radiotherapy in breast cancer patients-current status and DEGRO recommendations.

M D Piroth, D Krug, R Baumann, V Strnad, K Borm, S Combs, S Corradini, M N Duma, J Dunst, G Fastner, P Feyer, R Fietkau, W Harms, T Hehr, J Hörner-Rieber, C Matuschek, C Schmeel, W Budach, Breast Cancer Expert Panel of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO)
Author Information
  1. M D Piroth: Department of Radiation Oncology, HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, Heusnerstraße 40, 42283, Wuppertal, Germany. marc.piroth@helios-gesundheit.de. ORCID
  2. D Krug: Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  3. R Baumann: Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Marien-Krankenhaus, Siegen, Germany.
  4. V Strnad: Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
  5. K Borm: TUM School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  6. S Combs: TUM School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  7. S Corradini: Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
  8. M N Duma: Department of Radiation Oncology, Helios Clinics of Schwerin-University Campus of MSH Medical School Hamburg, Schwerin, Germany.
  9. J Dunst: Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
  10. G Fastner: Department of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, University Hospital Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
  11. P Feyer: Formerly Department of Radiation Oncology, Vivantes Hospital Neukölln, Berlin, Germany.
  12. R Fietkau: Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
  13. W Harms: Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Claraspital, Basel, Switzerland.
  14. T Hehr: Department of Radiation Oncology, Marienhospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
  15. J Hörner-Rieber: Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  16. C Matuschek: Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Bielefeld University, Medical School and University Medical Center OWL, Campus Klinikum Mitte, Bielefeld, Germany.
  17. C Schmeel: Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
  18. W Budach: Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this review is to give an overview of the results of prospective and retrospective studies using allogenic reconstruction and postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in breast cancer and to make recommendations regarding this interdisciplinary approach.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PubMed search was conducted to extract relevant articles from 2000 to 2024. The search was performed using the following terms: (breast cancer) AND (reconstruction OR implant OR expander) AND (radiotherapy OR radiation). Data from the literature on allogenic breast reconstruction and radiation are presented and discussed in relation to toxicity and cosmesis.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Breast reconstruction is also feasible if PMRT is necessary. Patients need to be informed about the relevant risk of capsular fibrosis and implant failure. A planned reconstruction is no reason to forgo PMRT nor is an indication for PMRT a reason to forego implant-based breast reconstruction if desired by the patient. It is important to provide detailed information here to enable shared decision-making. There is still no clear consensus regarding implant-based reconstruction (IBR) and PMRT. However, in clinical practice, both a one-stage (immediate "implant-direct" IBR) procedure with PMRT up to the final implant and a two-stage (immediate-delayed IBR) procedure with PMRT up to the tissue expander (TE) and later exchange of the TE are used; both approaches have their specific advantages and disadvantages. Depending on patient-specific factors and the surgeon's experience and estimates, both IBR procedures are also possible in combination with PMRT. When using a TE/implant approach, completing skin stretching by adequately filling the expander before PMRT may be favorable. This approach is particularly practical when adjuvant chemotherapy is planned but may lead to postponement of radiotherapy when primary systemic therapy is given. According to the latest data, moderate hypofractionation also appears to be safe in the context of the IBR approach. It is important to have a closely coordinated interdisciplinary approach and to fully inform patients about the increased rate of potential side effects.

Keywords

References

  1. Breast. 2015 Oct;24(5):661-6 [PMID: 26343944]
  2. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jan;131(1):1e-8e [PMID: 23271550]
  3. Lancet. 2014 Jun 21;383(9935):2127-35 [PMID: 24656685]
  4. J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun;113(8):906-12 [PMID: 26750435]
  5. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Feb 1;110(2): [PMID: 28954300]
  6. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Aug;128(2):353-359 [PMID: 21788827]
  7. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct;25(10):2899-2908 [PMID: 29978367]
  8. Ann Surg. 2010 Apr;251(4):632-9 [PMID: 20224371]
  9. Breast. 2022 Jun;63:123-139 [PMID: 35366506]
  10. Lancet. 2011 Nov 12;378(9804):1707-16 [PMID: 22019144]
  11. Strahlenther Onkol. 2019 Nov;195(11):949-963 [PMID: 31451835]
  12. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Jan;30(1):126-136 [PMID: 36245049]
  13. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2016 Nov - Dec;6(6):e219-e234 [PMID: 27659727]
  14. Front Surg. 2016 Jan 19;2:71 [PMID: 26835456]
  15. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022 Feb 1;112(2):445-456 [PMID: 34610389]
  16. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Sep;138(3):537-547 [PMID: 27556599]
  17. Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 07;16(2): [PMID: 38254756]
  18. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jun;127(6):2154-2166 [PMID: 21311392]
  19. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jan;23(1):e21-e31 [PMID: 34973228]
  20. JAMA Surg. 2018 Oct 1;153(10):891-899 [PMID: 29926096]
  21. Gland Surg. 2022 Nov;11(11):1817-1831 [PMID: 36518801]
  22. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Mar 1;106(3):514-524 [PMID: 31756414]
  23. Eur J Cancer. 2000 Oct;36(15):1938-43 [PMID: 11000574]
  24. Strahlenther Onkol. 2021 Apr;197(4):269-280 [PMID: 33507331]
  25. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Sep 15;110(4):1080-3 [PMID: 12198421]
  26. Radiother Oncol. 2019 Dec;141:327-328 [PMID: 31451283]
  27. Lancet Oncol. 2022 May;23(5):682-690 [PMID: 35397804]
  28. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Jul 1;150(1):32e-41e [PMID: 35499580]
  29. Strahlenther Onkol. 2009 Oct;185(10):669-74 [PMID: 19806332]
  30. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000 Sep;106(3):624-9 [PMID: 10987469]
  31. JAMA Oncol. 2024 Oct 1;10(10):1370-1378 [PMID: 39115975]
  32. J Surg Res. 2017 Oct;218:108-116 [PMID: 28985836]
  33. Br J Surg. 2022 Oct 14;109(11):1107-1115 [PMID: 35949111]
  34. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Nov;140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):60S-68S [PMID: 29064923]
  35. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015 Nov;68(11):1536-42 [PMID: 26277336]
  36. Gland Surg. 2015 Dec;4(6):506-18 [PMID: 26645005]
  37. Ann Surg. 2009 Mar;249(3):461-8 [PMID: 19247035]
  38. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Feb 17;11(2):e4800 [PMID: 36817273]
  39. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Dec;172(3):523-537 [PMID: 30182349]
  40. Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 24;10(1):1137 [PMID: 31980737]
  41. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Feb;127(2):514-524 [PMID: 21285756]
  42. Eur J Cancer. 2014 Nov;50(16):2752-62 [PMID: 25168640]
  43. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995 Oct;96(5):1119-23; discussion 1124 [PMID: 7568488]
  44. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Feb;20(1):61-7 [PMID: 18197008]
  45. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 May;113(6):1617-28 [PMID: 15114121]
  46. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e245217 [PMID: 38578640]
  47. Arch Plast Surg. 2015 Sep;42(5):532-43 [PMID: 26430623]
  48. Breast. 2021 Feb;55:37-44 [PMID: 33316582]
  49. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Dec;128(6):1170-1178 [PMID: 22094736]
  50. Radiother Oncol. 2021 Oct;163:105-113 [PMID: 34419507]
  51. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jun;135(6):1509-1517 [PMID: 25742523]
  52. Am J Surg. 2021 May;221(5):1005-1010 [PMID: 32988607]
  53. Gland Surg. 2016 Feb;5(1):55-62 [PMID: 26855909]
  54. Strahlenther Onkol. 2019 Jul;195(7):615-628 [PMID: 31101954]
  55. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015 Oct;68(10):1379-85 [PMID: 26210234]
  56. Clin Plast Surg. 2023 Apr;50(2):201-210 [PMID: 36813398]
  57. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Dec;46(6):2643-2654 [PMID: 35854008]
  58. Ann Plast Surg. 2008 May;60(5):568-72 [PMID: 18434833]
  59. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Oct;17 Suppl 3:202-10 [PMID: 20853034]
  60. Ann Surg. 2022 May 1;275(5):992-1001 [PMID: 32657919]
  61. Radiother Oncol. 2019 Dec;141:329-330 [PMID: 31451284]
  62. Ann Surg. 2019 Sep;270(3):473-483 [PMID: 31356276]
  63. Breast. 2021 Apr;56:42-52 [PMID: 33610903]
  64. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 Dec;66(12):1637-51 [PMID: 23886555]
  65. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Jul;108(1):78-82 [PMID: 11420508]
  66. Radiother Oncol. 2019 Aug;137:159-166 [PMID: 31108277]
  67. Lancet Oncol. 2023 Oct;24(10):1083-1093 [PMID: 37696281]
  68. Cancer Control. 2018 Jan-Dec;25(1):1073274818795489 [PMID: 30132338]
  69. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Mar 11;10(3):e4180 [PMID: 35291333]
  70. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Nov;27(12):4777-4785 [PMID: 32712889]
  71. Strahlenther Onkol. 2017 Aug;193(8):601-603 [PMID: 28631018]
  72. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015 Aug 31;112(35-36):593-600 [PMID: 26377531]
  73. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Aug;124(2):345-353 [PMID: 19644246]
  74. Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Jul;69(1):14-8 [PMID: 21629047]

MeSH Term

Humans
Breast Neoplasms
Female
Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
Breast Implants
Mastectomy
Breast Implantation
Mammaplasty
Postoperative Complications
Prospective Studies
Retrospective Studies
Combined Modality Therapy

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0reconstructionPMRTradiotherapybreastapproachIBRcancerANDusingORimplantexpanderBreastalsoallogenicrecommendationsregardinginterdisciplinarysearchrelevantradiationimplant-basedimportantprocedureTEmayadjuvantImplant-basedPURPOSE:aimreviewgiveoverviewresultsprospectiveretrospectivestudiespostmastectomymakeMATERIALSMETHODS:A PubMedconductedextractarticles20002024performedfollowingterms:DataliteraturepresenteddiscussedrelationtoxicitycosmesisCONCLUSIONRECOMMENDATIONS:feasiblenecessaryPatientsneedinformedriskcapsularfibrosisfailureA plannedreasonforgoindicationa reasonforegodesiredpatientprovidedetailedinformationenableshareddecision-makingstillclearconsensusHoweverclinicalpracticea one-stageimmediate"implant-direct"finala two-stageimmediate-delayedtissuelaterexchangeusedapproachesspecificadvantagesdisadvantagesDependingpatient-specificfactorssurgeon'sexperienceestimatesprocedurespossiblecombinationa TE/implantcompletingskinstretchingadequatelyfillingfavorableparticularlypracticalchemotherapyplannedleadpostponementprimarysystemictherapygivenAccordinglatestdatamoderatehypofractionationappearssafecontexta closelycoordinatedfullyinformpatientsincreasedratepotentialsideeffectspatients-currentstatusDEGROMastectomyPostmastectomyRadiotherapy

Similar Articles

Cited By