Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke: a study on intravenous thrombolysis in patients over 80 years of age with acute ischaemic stroke.

Marius Matusevicius, Ana Paiva Nunes, Manju Krishnan, Jose Egido, Letizia Concari, Anand Dixit, Monica Reggiani, Alain Pagès, Thierry Danays, Danilo Toni, Niaz Ahmed
Author Information
  1. Marius Matusevicius: Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden marius.matusevicius@ki.se. ORCID
  2. Ana Paiva Nunes: Stroke Unit, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central EPE, Lisboa, Portugal.
  3. Manju Krishnan: Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK.
  4. Jose Egido: Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
  5. Letizia Concari: AUSL Parma, Parma, Italy.
  6. Anand Dixit: Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
  7. Monica Reggiani: Department of Neurology, Rivoli Hospital, Rivoli, Italy.
  8. Alain Pagès: Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
  9. Thierry Danays: TDC, Aix en Provence, France.
  10. Danilo Toni: Department of Human Neurosciences, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
  11. Niaz Ahmed: Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the safety and efficacy outcomes of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients aged >80 years with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) after IVT was approved in this patient population in several European and non-European countries during 2018-2019.
DESIGN: This is an observational registry study using prospectively collected data from the Safe Implementation of Treatment in Stroke (SITS) registry. Comparisons will be performed between patients treated post-approval (July 2018 to December 2021) period with those treated pre-approval (June 2015 to June 2018) period using propensity score matching (PSM).
SETTING: This is a multicentre international study in hospitals treating AIS with IVT.
PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged >80 years who otherwise followed the IVT Summary of Product Characteristics of European countries as part of the mutual recognition procedure.
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The main outcomes were symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage per SITS monitoring study definition, death and functional independency as defined by a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 at 90 days.
RESULTS: After PSM, 614 patients remained in each group (mean age 87 years, 39% males). All baseline data were well balanced after PSM. There were no statistically significant differences in outcomes between pre- and post-approval patients for SICH (2.5% vs 2.3%, risk ratio (RR) 1.064, 95% CI 0.345-1.784), death (25.3% vs 28.4%, RR 0.889, 0.699-1.08) and functional independency at 90 days (40.3% vs 37%, RR 1.089, 0.942-1.237).
CONCLUSIONS: In this observational study of IVT treatment in patients >80 years of age with AIS before and after formal approval for this treatment, we did not find any difference in outcomes between the pre- and post-approval periods.

Keywords

References

  1. Eur Stroke J. 2021 Mar;6(1):I-LXII [PMID: 33817340]
  2. Int J Stroke. 2021 Jan;16(1):43-54 [PMID: 31657284]
  3. Neurology. 2017 Oct 10;89(15):1561-1568 [PMID: 28887377]
  4. Age Ageing. 2015 Jan;44(1):158-61 [PMID: 25355619]
  5. Stroke. 2010 Nov;41(11):2568-74 [PMID: 20930163]
  6. N Engl J Med. 1995 Dec 14;333(24):1581-7 [PMID: 7477192]
  7. Eur Stroke J. 2024 Dec;9(4):959-967 [PMID: 38738861]
  8. Stroke. 2010 Aug;41(8):1833-5 [PMID: 20576948]
  9. Lancet. 1998 Oct 17;352(9136):1245-51 [PMID: 9788453]
  10. Int J Stroke. 2018 Feb;13(2):175-189 [PMID: 29171359]
  11. JAMA. 1995 Oct 4;274(13):1017-25 [PMID: 7563451]
  12. Lancet. 2007 Jan 27;369(9558):275-82 [PMID: 17258667]
  13. Eur Stroke J. 2016 Sep;1(3):213-221 [PMID: 31008282]
  14. BMJ. 2010 Nov 23;341:c6046 [PMID: 21098614]
  15. Lancet. 2008 Oct 11;372(9646):1303-9 [PMID: 18790527]
  16. Stroke. 2016 Sep;47(9):2373-9 [PMID: 27507856]
  17. Lancet. 2014 Nov 29;384(9958):1929-35 [PMID: 25106063]
  18. JAMA. 1999 Dec 1;282(21):2019-26 [PMID: 10591384]
  19. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Oct;197:106177 [PMID: 32861925]
  20. Lancet. 2012 Jun 23;379(9834):2352-63 [PMID: 22632908]
  21. Lancet. 2004 Mar 06;363(9411):768-74 [PMID: 15016487]
  22. Lancet Neurol. 2016 Aug;15(9):925-933 [PMID: 27289487]
  23. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Dec 19;12(24):e031669 [PMID: 38108256]
  24. Stroke. 2020 Aug;51(8):2322-2331 [PMID: 32611284]
  25. JAMA Neurol. 2023 Mar 1;80(3):233-243 [PMID: 36807495]
  26. N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 25;359(13):1317-29 [PMID: 18815396]

MeSH Term

Humans
Female
Male
Aged, 80 and over
Thrombolytic Therapy
Ischemic Stroke
Registries
Fibrinolytic Agents
Treatment Outcome
Tissue Plasminogen Activator
Administration, Intravenous
Propensity Score
Prospective Studies
Cerebral Hemorrhage
Europe

Chemicals

Fibrinolytic Agents
Tissue Plasminogen Activator

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0patientsIVTyearsstudyoutcomes0>80AISpost-approvalPSMagevs3%RRintravenousthrombolysisagedacuteischaemicstrokeEuropeancountriesobservationalregistryusingdataSafeImplementationStrokeSITStreated2018periodJunescoredeathfunctionalindependency90dayspre-21treatmentOBJECTIVES:investigatesafetyefficacyapprovedpatientpopulationseveralnon-European2018-2019DESIGN:prospectivelycollectedTreatmentComparisonswillperformedJulyDecember2021pre-approval2015propensitymatchingSETTING:multicentreinternationalhospitalstreatingPARTICIPANTS:PatientsotherwisefollowedSummaryProductCharacteristicspartmutualrecognitionprocedurePRIMARYANDSECONDARYOUTCOMES:mainsymptomaticintracerebralhaemorrhagepermonitoringdefinitiondefinedmodifiedRankinScale0-2RESULTS:614remainedgroupmean8739%malesbaselinewellbalancedstatisticallysignificantdifferencesSICH5%riskratio06495%CI345-178425284%889699-1084037%089942-1237CONCLUSIONS:formalapprovalfinddifferenceperiodsTreatmentsStroke:80NEUROLOGYSTROKEMEDICINE

Similar Articles

Cited By