Assessing the risk spillover effects between the Chinese carbon market and the US-China energy market.

Jiale Yan, Cem Işık
Author Information
  1. Jiale Yan: College of Letters and Science, University of California Berkeley, 94720, USA.
  2. Cem Işık: Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Anadolu University, Eskisehir, Turkiye.

Abstract

Pollution caused by environmental problems has aggravated the problem of resource scarcity, and the destruction of the ecological environment by mankind has shown serious consequences. Countries around the world are actively launching various carbon emission reduction and energy transformation policies to face this predicament. This paper investigates the risk spillover effects of China's carbon trading market with China's energy market and the U.S. energy market from the first quarter of 2018 to the first quarter of 2022. This paper uses the optimal ARMA-GARCH to fit the marginal distribution of each market and selects the optimal Copula function for the calculation of CoVaR to obtain more accurate risk measurement results. The results of this paper are as follows. First, there is a bidirectional risk spillover effect between each market in China and the U.S. At the same time, the risk spillover is time-varying, and the extreme return brings more risk. Second, the overall trend of risk spillover from China's carbon market to the U.S.-China energy market has not increased significantly, but the risk of China's energy market to China's carbon market has increased significantly over time. Third, the risk spillover situation in China's carbon trading market is not smooth. Compared to the energy market, it is also more prone to violent reactions in the face of risks. This paper provides policy recommendations to promote the coordinated development of energy and carbon markets.

Keywords

References

  1. Glob Financ J. 2022 Feb;51:100692 [PMID: 38013879]
  2. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jan;31(1):1244-1259 [PMID: 38038916]
  3. Energy (Oxf). 2023 Jan 15;263:125798 [PMID: 36337365]
  4. J Environ Manage. 2024 Jun;360:121177 [PMID: 38776660]
  5. Appl Energy. 2022 Feb 1;307:118205 [PMID: 34840400]
  6. Energy Policy. 2021 Jul;154:112322 [PMID: 34566236]
  7. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb 19;: [PMID: 38372926]
  8. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2022 Apr;158:112135 [PMID: 35039746]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0marketcarbonriskenergyspilloverChina'spaperUSfaceeffectstradingfirstquarteroptimalresultsChinatimeincreasedsignificantlyUS-ChinaPollutioncausedenvironmentalproblemsaggravatedproblemresourcescarcitydestructionecologicalenvironmentmankindshownseriousconsequencesCountriesaroundworldactivelylaunchingvariousemissionreductiontransformationpoliciespredicamentinvestigates20182022usesARMA-GARCHfitmarginaldistributionselectsCopulafunctioncalculationCoVaRobtainaccuratemeasurementfollowsFirstbidirectionaleffecttime-varyingextremereturnbringsSecondoveralltrend-ChinaThirdsituationsmoothComparedalsoproneviolentreactionsrisksprovidespolicyrecommendationspromotecoordinateddevelopmentmarketsAssessingChineseRisk

Similar Articles

Cited By