Evaluating the Paucity of Female Surgeons in Plastic Surgery: A Review of the Systemic Barriers to Entry and Success.

Rijul S Maini, Savannah L Jelneck, William B Zimmerman
Author Information
  1. Rijul S Maini: Department of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, East Lansing, USA.
  2. Savannah L Jelneck: Department of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, East Lansing, USA.
  3. William B Zimmerman: Department of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, East Lansing, USA.

Abstract

The percentage of practicing female plastic surgeons in the United States is notably low. This narrative review sought to identify prominent barriers affecting women's entry and success in plastic surgery. A literature search was conducted using the National Library of Medicine from 2013 to 2023, using MeSH terms of gender disparity and plastic surgery. Included publications were peer-reviewed articles and systematic reviews evaluating gender disparity in plastic surgery, examining experiences, challenges, or opportunities for female plastic surgeons. Excluded publications did not include data gathered from the United States, included other minorities, or did not focus on plastic surgery. Overall, 191 papers were identified, with 14 papers being selected for this review. Early barriers identified before residency training include the lack of female mentors and the underrepresentation of female presenters at national plastic surgery conferences, with females comprising only 29% of presenters and 16% of abstract senior authors at national plastic surgery conferences between 2014 and 2015. During residency training, the most prominent barrier is pregnancy, with 73% of women delaying childbearing during residency and only 39% of men reporting the same. A second barrier during training includes gender disparity in the number of research publications, with females publishing 8.89 �� 0.97 publications during residency and males publishing 12.46 �� 1.08 publications (p = 0.0394). After residency training, evidence of barriers to career advancement includes poor representation of women in higher academic positions, such as program chairs and directors, with female representation of 9.2% and 13.1%, respectively, and gender disparity in industry payments. Systemic barriers before, during, and after plastic surgery residency training seem to influence the representation of women in plastic surgery at all levels. These barriers should be addressed to increase the number of practicing female plastic surgeons and diversify the field.

Keywords

References

  1. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Sep;146(3):690-697 [PMID: 32842118]
  2. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jan;143(1):315-326 [PMID: 30589810]
  3. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Aug 11;11(8):e5165 [PMID: 37577242]
  4. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jul;142(1):252-264 [PMID: 29952905]
  5. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 May 06;10(5):e4301 [PMID: 35539293]
  6. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Mar 1;147(3):516-526 [PMID: 33587563]
  7. Aesthet Surg J. 2020 Oct 24;40(11):1241-1248 [PMID: 31665219]
  8. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jun;141(6):1561-1577 [PMID: 29794715]
  9. PLoS One. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0235058 [PMID: 33370290]
  10. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Jun 1;149(6):1475-1484 [PMID: 35436258]
  11. Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Feb;84(2):201-207 [PMID: 31633536]
  12. Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Jul;85(S1 Suppl 1):S127-S128 [PMID: 32205494]
  13. J Surg Res. 2021 Sep;265:204-211 [PMID: 33951585]
  14. Am J Surg. 2020 Nov;220(5):1351-1357 [PMID: 32746978]
  15. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Aug;146(2):217e-220e [PMID: 32740601]
  16. Open Med. 2009;3(3):e123-30 [PMID: 21603045]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0plasticsurgeryfemaleresidencygenderdisparitytrainingsurgeonsbarrierspublicationswomenrepresentationpracticingUnitedStatesreviewprominentusingincludepapersidentifiedpresentersnationalconferencesfemalesbarrierincludesnumberpublishing��0Systemicpercentagenotablylownarrativesoughtidentifyaffectingwomen'sentrysuccessliteraturesearchconductedNationalLibraryMedicine20132023MeSHtermsIncludedpeer-reviewedarticlessystematicreviewsevaluatingexaminingexperienceschallengesopportunitiesExcludeddatagatheredincludedminoritiesfocusOverall19114selectedEarlylackmentorsunderrepresentationcomprising29%16%abstractseniorauthors20142015pregnancy73%delayingchildbearing39%menreportingsecondresearch88997males1246108p=0394evidencecareeradvancementpoorhigheracademicpositionsprogramchairsdirectors92%131%respectivelyindustrypaymentsseeminfluencelevelsaddressedincreasediversifyfieldEvaluatingPaucityFemaleSurgeonsPlasticSurgery:ReviewBarriersEntrySuccessamericansocietyreconstructive

Similar Articles

Cited By