Enabling participation in community-dwelling children and young people with acquired brain injuries and their families: a theory-based, evidence-based and person-based approach to intervention development.

Rachel Keetley, Joseph C Manning, Jade Kettlewell, Jane Williams, Emily Bennett, Victoria Lyon, Kate Radford
Author Information
  1. Rachel Keetley: Centre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK rachel.keetley1@nhs.net. ORCID
  2. Joseph C Manning: Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK. ORCID
  3. Jade Kettlewell: School for Primary Care Research, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
  4. Jane Williams: Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK. ORCID
  5. Emily Bennett: Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
  6. Victoria Lyon: PPIE, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
  7. Kate Radford: Centre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. ORCID

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To codesign and develop an intervention to promote participation and well-being in children and young people (CYP) with acquired brain injury (ABI) and family caregivers.
DESIGN: A complex intervention development study including a scoping review, mixed-methods study, co-design workshop and theoretical modelling.
SETTING: Community-dwelling participants in one geographical region of the UK.
PARTICIPANTS: CYP with ABI (5-18 years) and their parents, health, education, social care and voluntary/third-sector practitioners.
RESULTS: The intervention development process using a theory-driven and evidence-informed approach, combining the Behaviour Change Wheel and the person-based approach is described. Findings from the scoping review and mixed-methods study were analysed and synthesised using the framework method and the International Classification of Functioning, Health and Disability and the Behaviour Change Wheel. Evidence of identified participation needs, barriers and facilitators was presented at the codesign workshop. The findings demonstrate the significant long-term impact of an ABI on CYP participation and both CYP and parent well-being with significant unmet family needs. Barriers and facilitators were identified, with key barriers being lack of knowledge and understanding, lack of parental and family support and a need for cross-sector collaboration and communication. Stakeholders identified potential solutions and intervention ingredients, such as the need for education for families and schools regarding long-term impact of ABI, and longer-term practical and emotional support for families. Findings from the workshop were analysed using the framework method and synthesised with previous findings using the Behaviour Change Wheel. Theoretical modelling enabled guiding principles to be identified and an intervention logic model to be produced. 'ABI-Participate' is a novel, multifaceted intervention, developed with CYP with ABI, their parents and professionals from across health, education, social care and charity sectors. Using a case coordination model, ABI-Participate aims to address the unmet needs and barriers of this population and includes needs assessment, goal setting, action planning, health coaching, practical and emotional support for families and multiagency liaison and collaboration, adopting an individualised needs-based approach.
CONCLUSION: A systematic process using a theory-based, evidence-based and person-based approach resulted in a novel, codesigned, multifaceted intervention, grounded in an in-depth understanding of CYP with ABI participation needs, barriers and facilitators. Further development and refinement of the individual elements of ABI-Participate and the care pathway to support its implementation are now required prior to feasibility testing.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 17;22(1):214 [PMID: 35177039]
  2. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2024 Jul;66(7):931-938 [PMID: 38140720]
  3. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2023 Dec;33(10):1697-1727 [PMID: 36423210]
  4. Brain Inj. 2019;33(5):574-583 [PMID: 30669868]
  5. Brain Inj. 2004 Jan;18(1):65-82 [PMID: 14660237]
  6. Phys Ther. 2015 Oct;95(10):1374-86 [PMID: 25997950]
  7. Implement Sci. 2017 Jun 21;12(1):77 [PMID: 28637486]
  8. Dev Neurorehabil. 2021 Aug;24(6):379-387 [PMID: 33615981]
  9. Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Feb;44(4):608-616 [PMID: 32520596]
  10. Clin Neuropsychol. 2014;28(2):181-98 [PMID: 24498935]
  11. Ann Fam Med. 2019 Sep;17(5):448-458 [PMID: 31501208]
  12. Clin Rehabil. 2020 May;34(5):571-583 [PMID: 32037876]
  13. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 11;21(1):1077 [PMID: 34635125]
  14. Brain Inj. 2021 Apr 16;35(5):563-573 [PMID: 33734919]
  15. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2022 Nov;57(11):2589-2602 [PMID: 35932183]
  16. Dev Neurorehabil. 2020 Jul;23(5):328-335 [PMID: 31746261]
  17. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 08;18(4): [PMID: 33567741]
  18. Evid Based Nurs. 2020 Apr;23(2):35-37 [PMID: 32102795]
  19. Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 21;10:53 [PMID: 25895742]
  20. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018 May;60(5):513-519 [PMID: 29405282]
  21. Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Dec;44(25):7993-8000 [PMID: 34860632]
  22. Child Care Health Dev. 2010 Jan;36(1):1-2 [PMID: 20089085]
  23. Implement Sci. 2016 Aug 08;11:113 [PMID: 27502590]
  24. Brain Inj. 2016;30(13-14):1656-1664 [PMID: 27740853]
  25. Brain Inj. 2024 Feb 23;38(3):217-226 [PMID: 38363813]
  26. Trials. 2022 Feb 22;23(1):169 [PMID: 35193666]
  27. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(5):433-41 [PMID: 25974226]
  28. BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 8;10(4):e033516 [PMID: 32273313]
  29. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(12):1041-52 [PMID: 22080765]
  30. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 16;18(18): [PMID: 34574670]
  31. BMJ. 2014 Mar 07;348:g1687 [PMID: 24609605]
  32. Nurs Forum. 2014 Jan-Mar;49(1):18-29 [PMID: 24456550]
  33. Cancer Control. 2020 Jul-Aug;27(3):1073274820906124 [PMID: 32715730]
  34. Brain Impair. 2024 Feb;25: [PMID: 38566298]
  35. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009 May-Jun;24(3):195-212 [PMID: 19461367]
  36. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2022 May;32(4):537-559 [PMID: 33108961]
  37. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2014;7(3):241-54 [PMID: 25260507]
  38. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2012 May;30(3):217-24 [PMID: 22100364]
  39. Pediatr Neurol. 2012 Jun;46(6):339-44 [PMID: 22633627]
  40. BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061 [PMID: 34593508]
  41. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jan 30;17(1):e30 [PMID: 25639757]
  42. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2017 Nov/Dec;32(6):367-377 [PMID: 28060211]
  43. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019 Nov;61(11):1259-1265 [PMID: 30883717]
  44. Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Sep;44(19):5592-5602 [PMID: 34251954]
  45. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2015 Oct 26;1:37 [PMID: 27965815]
  46. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2020 Feb 21;20(2):3 [PMID: 32086598]
  47. Brain Inj. 2015 Sep;29(10):1135-1145 [PMID: 26004754]
  48. BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 15;9(8):e029954 [PMID: 31420394]
  49. Brain Inj. 2019;33(9):1117-1128 [PMID: 31282198]
  50. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2024 Apr;66(4):501-513 [PMID: 37792283]
  51. J Clin Med. 2022 May 03;11(9): [PMID: 35566690]
  52. Aust Occup Ther J. 2010 Apr;57(2):118-26 [PMID: 20854577]
  53. Brain Sci. 2020 Oct 28;10(11): [PMID: 33126519]

MeSH Term

Humans
Child
Adolescent
Brain Injuries
Female
Male
Caregivers
Child, Preschool
Parents
United Kingdom
Independent Living

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0interventionCYPABIparticipationusingapproachneedsdevelopmentidentifiedbarrierssupportfamilystudyworkshophealtheducationcareBehaviourChangeWheelperson-basedfacilitatorsfamiliescodesignwell-beingchildrenyoungpeopleacquiredbrainscopingreviewmixed-methodsmodellingparentssocialprocessFindingsanalysedsynthesisedframeworkmethodfindingssignificantlong-termimpactunmetlackunderstandingneedcollaborationpracticalemotionalmodelnovelmultifacetedABI-Participatetheory-basedevidence-basedOBJECTIVE:developpromoteinjurycaregiversDESIGN:complexincludingco-designtheoreticalSETTING:Community-dwellingparticipantsonegeographicalregionUKPARTICIPANTS:5-18yearsvoluntary/third-sectorpractitionersRESULTS:theory-drivenevidence-informedcombiningdescribedInternationalClassificationFunctioningHealthDisabilityEvidencepresenteddemonstrateparentBarrierskeyknowledgeparentalcross-sectorcommunicationStakeholderspotentialsolutionsingredientsschoolsregardinglonger-termpreviousTheoreticalenabledguidingprincipleslogicproduced'ABI-Participate'developedprofessionalsacrosscharitysectorsUsingcasecoordinationaimsaddresspopulationincludesassessmentgoalsettingactionplanningcoachingmultiagencyliaisonadoptingindividualisedneeds-basedCONCLUSION:systematicresultedcodesignedgroundedin-depthrefinementindividualelementspathwayimplementationnowrequiredpriorfeasibilitytestingEnablingcommunity-dwellinginjuriesfamilies:AdolescentsBrainInjuriesPAEDIATRICSPsychosocialInterventionQualityLife

Similar Articles

Cited By