Critical Steps in Shotgun Metagenomics-Based Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections Using Nanopore Sequencing.

Amelia Bj��rnberg, David Nestor, Nilay Peker, Bhanu Sinha, Natacha Couto, John Rossen, Martin Sundqvist, Paula M��lling
Author Information
  1. Amelia Bj��rnberg: Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Microbiology ��rebro University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Health at ��rebro University, ��rebro, Sweden. ORCID
  2. David Nestor: Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Microbiology ��rebro University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Health at ��rebro University, ��rebro, Sweden.
  3. Nilay Peker: Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  4. Bhanu Sinha: Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  5. Natacha Couto: Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  6. John Rossen: Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands. ORCID
  7. Martin Sundqvist: Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Microbiology ��rebro University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Health at ��rebro University, ��rebro, Sweden.
  8. Paula M��lling: Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Microbiology ��rebro University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Health at ��rebro University, ��rebro, Sweden.

Abstract

Shotgun metagenomics offers a broad detection of pathogens for rapid blood stream infection of pathogens but struggles with often low numbers of pathogens combined with high levels of human background DNA in clinical samples. This study aimed to develop a shotgun metagenomics protocol using blood spiked with various bacteria and to assess bacterial DNA extraction efficiency with human DNA depletion. The Blood Pathogen Kit (Molzym) was used to extract DNA from EDTA-whole blood (WB) and plasma samples, using contrived blood specimens spiked with bacteria for shotgun metagenomics diagnostics via Oxford Nanopore sequencing and PCR-based library preparation. Results showed that bacterial reads were higher in WB than plasma. Differences for Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae were more pronounced compared to Escherichia coli. Plasma samples exhibited better method reproducibility, with more consistent droplet digital PCR results for human DNA. The study found that extraction was more efficient for Gram-positive bacteria than Gram-negative, suggesting that the human DNA depletion exerts a negative effect on Gram-negative bacteria. Overall, shotgun metagenomics needs further optimisation to improve bacterial DNA recovery and enhance pathogen detection sensitivity. This study highlights some critical steps in the methodology of shotgun metagenomic-based diagnosis of blood stream infections using Nanopore sequencing.

References

  1. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Feb 16;23(4): [PMID: 35216302]
  2. J Microbiol Methods. 2017 Sep;140:61-66 [PMID: 28669799]
  3. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Sep;24(9):944-955 [PMID: 29787889]
  4. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Sep 27;12:1021320 [PMID: 36237436]
  5. J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Dec 23;58(1): [PMID: 31619531]
  6. J Virol Methods. 2018 Oct;260:70-74 [PMID: 30006102]
  7. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2011;2:259-79 [PMID: 22129383]
  8. J Appl Lab Med. 2019 Jan;3(4):643-653 [PMID: 31639732]
  9. J Mol Diagn. 2020 Mar;22(3):405-418 [PMID: 32146977]
  10. Front Microbiol. 2016 May 12;7:697 [PMID: 27242721]
  11. Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):200-211 [PMID: 31954465]
  12. Genome Biol. 2019 Nov 28;20(1):257 [PMID: 31779668]
  13. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Feb;26(2):142-150 [PMID: 31760113]
  14. Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 21;6:23532 [PMID: 26996149]
  15. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2021 Dec;21(12):1273-1285 [PMID: 34755585]
  16. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015 Apr;21(4):323-31 [PMID: 25686695]
  17. J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Sep;45(9):2761-4 [PMID: 17626177]
  18. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 16;5(12):ofy301 [PMID: 30581881]
  19. Chest. 2016 Dec;150(6):1251-1259 [PMID: 27615024]
  20. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Feb;26(2):168-173 [PMID: 31654793]
  21. Microbiome. 2022 Dec 2;10(1):209 [PMID: 36457010]
  22. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2018 Aug;18(8):749-759 [PMID: 29985081]
  23. J Clin Microbiol. 2023 Apr 20;61(4):e0163122 [PMID: 36988494]
  24. Crit Care Med. 2019 May;47(5):e394-e402 [PMID: 30720537]
  25. Bioinformatics. 2018 Aug 1;34(15):2666-2669 [PMID: 29547981]
  26. PLoS One. 2019 Nov 13;14(11):e0224656 [PMID: 31721817]
  27. JAMA Oncol. 2020 Apr 1;6(4):552-556 [PMID: 31855231]
  28. J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Feb;39(2):485-93 [PMID: 11158094]
  29. Genome Med. 2016 Jul 01;8(1):73 [PMID: 27368373]

MeSH Term

Humans
Metagenomics
Nanopore Sequencing
DNA, Bacterial
Bacteremia
Reproducibility of Results

Chemicals

DNA, Bacterial

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By