A Patient-Oriented Implementation Strategy for a Perioperative mHealth Intervention: Feasibility Cohort Study.

Daan Toben, Astrid de Wind, Eva van der Meij, Judith A F Huirne, Johannes R Anema
Author Information
  1. Daan Toben: Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ORCID
  2. Astrid de Wind: Societal Participation & Health , Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ORCID
  3. Eva van der Meij: Societal Participation & Health , Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ORCID
  4. Judith A F Huirne: Societal Participation & Health , Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ORCID
  5. Johannes R Anema: Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Day surgery is being increasingly implemented across Europe, driven in part by capacity problems. Patients recovering at home could benefit from tools tailored to their new care setting to effectively manage their convalescence. The mHealth application ikHerstel is one such tool, but although it administers its functions in the home, its implementation hinges on health care professionals within the hospital.
OBJECTIVE: We conducted a feasibility study of an additional patient-oriented implementation strategy for ikHerstel. This strategy aimed to empower patients to access and use ikHerstel independently, in contrast to implementation as usual, which hinges on the health care professional acting as gatekeeper. Our research question was "How well are patients able to use ikHerstel independently of their health care professional?"
METHODS: We investigated the implementation strategy in terms of its recruitment, reach, dose delivered, dose received, and fidelity. Patients with a recent or prospective elective surgery were recruited using a wide array of materials to simulate patient-oriented dissemination of ikHerstel. Data were collected through web-based surveys. Descriptive analysis and open coding were used to analyze the data.
RESULTS: Recruitment yielded 213 registrations, with 55 patients ultimately included in the study. The sample was characterized by patients undergoing abdominal surgery, with high literacy and above average digital health literacy, and included an overrepresentation of women (48/55, 87%). The implementation strategy had a reach of 81% (63/78), with 87% (55/67) of patients creating a recovery plan. Patients were satisfied with their independent use of ikHerstel, rating it an average 7.0 (SD 1.9) of 10, and 54% (29/54) of patients explicitly reported no difficulties in using it. A major concern of the implementation strategy was conflicts in recommendations between ikHerstel and the health care professionals, as well as the resulting feelings of insecurity experienced by patients.
CONCLUSIONS: In this small feasibility study, most patients were satisfied with the patient-oriented implementation strategy. However, the lack of involvement of health care professionals due to the strategy contributed to patient concerns regarding conflicting recommendations between ikHerstel and health care professionals.

Keywords

References

  1. Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Jul 22;3(1):80 [PMID: 35869516]
  2. Ochsner J. 2010 Spring;10(1):38-43 [PMID: 21603354]
  3. BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 21;8(1):e017782 [PMID: 29358423]
  4. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Dec;50(12):1630-8 [PMID: 23726224]
  5. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jan 02;20(1):e1 [PMID: 29295808]
  6. J Clin Anesth. 2009 May;21(3):200-5 [PMID: 19464614]
  7. JMIR Hum Factors. 2021 Feb 8;8(1):e20694 [PMID: 33555262]
  8. Lancet. 2018 Jul 7;392(10141):51-59 [PMID: 29937195]
  9. Pharmaceutics. 2021 Jul 20;13(7): [PMID: 34371791]
  10. J Perianesth Nurs. 2022 Aug;37(4):515-520 [PMID: 35279387]
  11. Surg Innov. 2019 Apr;26(2):244-259 [PMID: 30602332]
  12. BJOG. 2014 Aug;121(9):1127-35; discussion 1136 [PMID: 24511914]
  13. Int Urogynecol J. 2013 May;24(5):719-24 [PMID: 23340879]
  14. Eur J Intern Med. 2015 Apr;26(3):190-6 [PMID: 25704328]
  15. Ann Surg. 2021 May 1;273(5):909-916 [PMID: 31460878]
  16. Anesthesiology. 2013 Dec;119(6):1310-21 [PMID: 24108100]
  17. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Jun;21(6):559-63 [PMID: 16808736]
  18. Occup Med (Lond). 2007 Oct;57(7):488-91 [PMID: 17906266]
  19. BMC Public Health. 2016 Nov 14;16(1):1158 [PMID: 27842533]
  20. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 06;21(2):e9938 [PMID: 30724740]
  21. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 13;22(4):e17342 [PMID: 32281936]
  22. J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jun;16(6):1109-17 [PMID: 17518885]
  23. Urology. 2010 Feb;75(2):421-4 [PMID: 19969327]
  24. J Occup Rehabil. 2014 Sep;24(3):425-38 [PMID: 24057871]
  25. J Clin Nurs. 2011 Nov;20(21-22):3143-51 [PMID: 21762418]
  26. Lancet Digit Health. 2023 Aug;5(8):e485-e494 [PMID: 37419843]
  27. Surgery. 2014 Jul;156(1):20-7 [PMID: 24856316]
  28. BMC Geriatr. 2022 May 24;22(1):449 [PMID: 35610577]
  29. World J Surg. 2023 Mar;47(3):627-639 [PMID: 36380104]

MeSH Term

Humans
Feasibility Studies
Telemedicine
Female
Male
Middle Aged
Cohort Studies
Aged
Adult
Surveys and Questionnaires
Prospective Studies
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0carehealthikHerstelpatientsimplementationstrategysurgeryprofessionalspatient-orienteddigitalPatientsmHealthfeasibilitystudyusepatientperioperativehomeconvalescencehingeshospitalindependentlywellreachdoseelectiveusingincludedliteracyaverage87%recoverysatisfiedrecommendationsinterventionBACKGROUND:DayincreasinglyimplementedacrossEuropedrivenpartcapacityproblemsrecoveringbenefittoolstailorednewsettingeffectivelymanageapplicationonetoolalthoughadministersfunctionswithinOBJECTIVE:conductedadditionalaimedempoweraccesscontrastusualprofessionalactinggatekeeperresearchquestion"Howableprofessional?"METHODS:investigatedtermsrecruitmentdeliveredreceivedfidelityrecentprospectiverecruitedwidearraymaterialssimulatedisseminationDatacollectedweb-basedsurveysDescriptiveanalysisopencodingusedanalyzedataRESULTS:Recruitmentyielded213registrations55ultimatelysamplecharacterizedundergoingabdominalhighoverrepresentationwomen48/5581%63/7855/67creatingplanindependentrating70SD191054%29/54explicitlyreporteddifficultiesmajorconcernconflictsresultingfeelingsinsecurityexperiencedCONCLUSIONS:smallHoweverlackinvolvementduecontributedconcernsregardingconflictingPatient-OrientedImplementationStrategyPerioperativeIntervention:FeasibilityCohortStudycaregivercustomizeeHealthmobileappeducationmedicinesurgicaltailortechnology

Similar Articles

Cited By