Effects of eccentric resistance training after stroke on body function, activities of daily living and cognitive function: A review.

Maria Ramoneda-Rabat, Josep Medina-Casanovas, Maria Betina Nishishinya Aquino, Myriam Guerra-Balic
Author Information
  1. Maria Ramoneda-Rabat: FPCEE-Blanquerna, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain.
  2. Josep Medina-Casanovas: Fundaci�� Institut de Neurorehabilitaci�� Guttmann, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain.
  3. Maria Betina Nishishinya Aquino: Fundaci��n Garc��a-Cugat, Instituto Cugat, Hospital Quir��n Salud, Barcelona, Spain.
  4. Myriam Guerra-Balic: FPCEE-Blanquerna, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain.

Abstract

Impairments on body function, activities of daily living (ADL) and cognition are common after stroke. Eccentric resistance training (ERT) may be implemented to improve them. The primary objectives were to evaluate whether ERT improves body function, ADL and cognition after stroke. The secondary objectives were to evaluate whether ERT improves strength, gait, quality of life, and self-perceived health. Seven electronic databases were searched: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register, PubMed, Epistemonikos, Embase, SPORTDiscus, and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Last search was run in December 2023, including studies since 2012. Selection criteria were studies with stroke participants of both sexes, aged 18 or more, with an intervention based on ERT. Accepted languages were English, Spanish or French. First search was done in pairs. Authors removed duplicate studies and those which did not meet inclusion criteria through title and abstracts. Finally, all authors, independently, screened the final search results and extracted data. Of 68 records identified, 15 were eligible and 6 were finally included (with moderate risk of bias), analyzing 159 participants. Body function (4 interventions,  ���= ���84), gait (4 interventions,  ���= ���115) and strength (3 interventions,  ���= ���78) showed significantly better results when ERT was performed. Meta-analysis could not be done because of the few studies and their heterogeneity. This review provided low-moderate quality evidence suggesting that ERT might be effective at improving body function, strength, and gait after stroke. Besides, no harm was documented, and it was well-accepted.

Keywords

References

  1. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016 Apr 06;13:37 [PMID: 27052303]
  2. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Feb;39(2):142-8 [PMID: 1991946]
  3. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Jul;28(7):2055-8 [PMID: 27512263]
  4. Can J Public Health. 1992 Jul-Aug;83 Suppl 2:S7-11 [PMID: 1468055]
  5. Phys Ther. 2003 Aug;83(8):713-21 [PMID: 12882612]
  6. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31 [PMID: 1135616]
  7. Stroke. 1995 Nov;26(11):2027-30 [PMID: 7482643]
  8. Front Physiol. 2019 May 03;10:536 [PMID: 31130877]
  9. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013 May;27(4):335-44 [PMID: 23292848]
  10. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Apr;96(4):754-9 [PMID: 25433219]
  11. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;34(1):209-13 [PMID: 24284463]
  12. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Jan;29(1):104498 [PMID: 31732460]
  13. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98 [PMID: 1202204]
  14. Disabil Rehabil. 1997 Sep;19(9):355-8 [PMID: 9330895]
  15. Disabil Rehabil. 1995 Jan;17(1):10-4 [PMID: 7858276]
  16. J Physiother. 2018 Apr;64(2):84-90 [PMID: 29602748]
  17. Clin Rehabil. 2020 Sep;34(9):1173-1197 [PMID: 32527148]
  18. J Bone Metab. 2020 May;27(2):85-96 [PMID: 32572369]
  19. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 20;3:CD003316 [PMID: 32196635]
  20. Aust J Physiother. 2006;52(4):241-8 [PMID: 17132118]
  21. Clin Rehabil. 2004 Feb;18(1):27-39 [PMID: 14763717]
  22. Front Physiol. 2017 Nov 03;8:891 [PMID: 29163224]
  23. BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 14;9(11):e031144 [PMID: 31727655]
  24. J Neurol. 2018 Aug;265(8):1829-1835 [PMID: 29876762]
  25. NeuroRehabilitation. 2021;48(4):513-522 [PMID: 33967063]
  26. Rev Neurol. 2013 Dec 16;57(12):535-41 [PMID: 24288102]
  27. Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 8;11(1):121 [PMID: 33420277]
  28. Qual Life Res. 2004 Mar;13(2):299-310 [PMID: 15085902]
  29. J Neurophysiol. 2001 Oct;86(4):1764-72 [PMID: 11600637]
  30. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Oct 30;11:150 [PMID: 25359231]
  31. J Gerontol. 1994 Mar;49(2):M85-94 [PMID: 8126356]
  32. Can J Cardiol. 2016 Apr;32(4):495-504 [PMID: 26995692]
  33. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2017 Sep;32(5):541-556 [PMID: 28708630]
  34. NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;40(1):33-48 [PMID: 27814304]
  35. Stroke. 2015 Feb;46(2):389-94 [PMID: 25538204]
  36. NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;40(4):459-471 [PMID: 28211820]
  37. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9 [PMID: 15817019]
  38. J Sports Sci. 2021 May;39(10):1136-1143 [PMID: 33337956]
  39. Med Clin (Barc). 1995 May 27;104(20):771-6 [PMID: 7783470]
  40. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 May 29;284(6329):1607-8 [PMID: 6805625]
  41. Front Physiol. 2018 Aug 07;9:1013 [PMID: 30131705]
  42. J Sci Med Sport. 2020 Nov;23(11):1093-1099 [PMID: 32461050]
  43. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2019 Aug;44(8):827-833 [PMID: 30620623]
  44. Circ Res. 2022 Apr 15;130(8):1252-1271 [PMID: 35420911]
  45. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:193741 [PMID: 26543850]
  46. Ageing Res Rev. 2022 Apr;76:101591 [PMID: 35182742]
  47. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 May 20;12:660181 [PMID: 34093436]
  48. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2023 Jun;123(6):1323-1342 [PMID: 36801969]
  49. Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10(2):61-3 [PMID: 3403500]
  50. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Jan;94(4):e411 [PMID: 25634170]
  51. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014 Jun;10(6):315-25 [PMID: 24776923]
  52. Eur J Sport Sci. 2019 Oct;19(9):1184-1194 [PMID: 30957699]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0functionERTstrokebodystudiesdailylivingresistancetrainingstrengthgaitTrialssearchinterventionsactivitiesADLcognitionEccentricobjectivesevaluatewhetherimprovesqualityCochraneRegisterStrokecriteriaparticipantsdoneresultsBody4reviewImpairmentscommonmayimplementedimproveprimarysecondarylifeself-perceivedhealthSevenelectronicdatabasessearched:CentralControlledGroupPubMedEpistemonikosEmbaseSPORTDiscusWHOInternationalClinicalRegistryPlatformLastrunDecember2023includingsince2012Selectionsexesaged18interventionbasedAcceptedlanguagesEnglishSpanishFrenchFirstpairsAuthorsremovedduplicatemeetinclusiontitleabstractsFinallyauthorsindependentlyscreenedfinalextracteddata68recordsidentified15eligible6finallyincludedmoderateriskbiasanalyzing159 ���= ���84 ���= ���1153 ���= ���78showedsignificantlybetterperformedMeta-analysisheterogeneityprovidedlow-moderateevidencesuggestingmighteffectiveimprovingBesidesharmdocumentedwell-acceptedEffectseccentriccognitivefunction:ActivitiesCognitive

Similar Articles

Cited By