A Nudge to the Truth: Atom Conservation as a Hard Constraint in Models of Atmospheric Composition Using a Species-Weighted Correction.

Patrick Obin Sturm, Sam J Silva
Author Information
  1. Patrick Obin Sturm: Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, United States. ORCID
  2. Sam J Silva: Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, United States. ORCID

Abstract

Computational models of atmospheric composition are not always physically consistent. For example, not all models respect fundamental conservation laws such as conservation of atoms in an interconnected chemical system. In well performing models, these unphysical deviations are often ignored because they are frequently minor, and thus only need a small nudge to perfectly conserve mass. Here we introduce a method that anchors a prediction from any numerical model to physically consistent hard constraints, nudging concentrations to the nearest solution that respects the conservation laws. This closed-form model-agnostic correction uses a single matrix operation to minimally perturb the predicted concentrations to ensure that atoms are conserved to machine precision. To demonstrate this approach, we train a gradient boosting decision tree ensemble to emulate a small reference model of ozone photochemistry and test the effect of the correction on accurate but nonconservative predictions. The nudging approach minimally perturbs the already well-predicted results for most species, but decreases the accuracy of important oxidants, including radicals. We develop a weighted extension of this nudging approach that considers the uncertainty and magnitude of each species in the correction. This species-level weighting approach is essential to accurately predict important low concentration species such as radicals. We find that applying the species-weighted correction slightly improves overall accuracy by nudging unphysical predictions to a more likely mass-conserving solution.

References

  1. Phys Rev Lett. 2021 Mar 5;126(9):098302 [PMID: 33750168]
  2. PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Oct 18;19(10):e1011530 [PMID: 37851697]
  3. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2023 May 16;7(6):1235-1246 [PMID: 37342759]
  4. Sci Adv. 2020 Feb 05;6(6):eaay8967 [PMID: 32076652]
  5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 22;111(16):5802-7 [PMID: 24711404]
  6. Phys Rev E. 2024 Feb;109(2):L023301 [PMID: 38491673]
  7. Geosci Model Dev. 2024 Feb 20;7(4):1511-1524 [PMID: 38510104]
  8. Atmos Chem Phys. 2014 Mar;14(5):2679-2698 [PMID: 33758588]
  9. J Adv Model Earth Syst. 2021 Apr;13(4):e2020MS002413 [PMID: 34221240]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0nudgingcorrectionapproachmodelsconservationspeciesphysicallyconsistentlawsatomsunphysicalsmallmodelconcentrationssolutionminimallypredictionsaccuracyimportantradicalsComputationalatmosphericcompositionalwaysexamplerespectfundamentalinterconnectedchemicalsystemwellperformingdeviationsoftenignoredfrequentlyminorthusneednudgeperfectlyconservemassintroducemethodanchorspredictionnumericalhardconstraintsnearestrespectsclosed-formmodel-agnosticusessinglematrixoperationperturbpredictedensureconservedmachineprecisiondemonstratetraingradientboostingdecisiontreeensembleemulatereferenceozonephotochemistrytesteffectaccuratenonconservativeperturbsalreadywell-predictedresultsdecreasesoxidantsincludingdevelopweightedextensionconsidersuncertaintymagnitudespecies-levelweightingessentialaccuratelypredictlowconcentrationfindapplyingspecies-weightedslightlyimprovesoveralllikelymass-conservingNudgeTruth:AtomConservationHardConstraintModelsAtmosphericCompositionUsingSpecies-WeightedCorrection

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.