The impact mechanism of geopolitical risks on ESG performance: The moderating effects of investor attention and government subsidies.

Pengfei Cheng, Mengzhen Wang, Kanyong Li, Baekryul Choi, Wenliang Chen
Author Information
  1. Pengfei Cheng: School of Economics and Management, Hubei University of Automotive Technology, Shiyan City, Hubei Province, China.
  2. Mengzhen Wang: School of Economics and Management, Hubei University of Automotive Technology, Shiyan City, Hubei Province, China. ORCID
  3. Kanyong Li: School of Economics and Management, Shandong Jiaotong University, Jinan, China.
  4. Baekryul Choi: Department of International Trade, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do, Republic of Korea.
  5. Wenliang Chen: College of Inland Open Economics, Guizhou University of Commerce, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.

Abstract

The impact of geopolitical risks (GPR) on enterprises is significant, yet the existing literature lacks a comprehensive understanding of how GPR affects environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance. This study addresses this gap by analysing data from Chinese enterprises over the period 2009 to 2021. It empirically examines the impact of GPR on ESG performance and explores the underlying mechanisms. Specifically, the analysis considers the roles of investor attention and government subsidies as moderating factors. The results indicate that GPR inhibits corporate ESG performance. State-owned enterprises are found to mitigate these adverse effects, while privately-owned enterprises tend to exacerbate them. Mechanism tests reveal that GPR negatively impacts ESG performance by increasing financing constraints and reducing financial performance. Furthermore, increased investor attention and government subsidies can alleviate the negative effects of GPR on ESG performance. These findings offer valuable insights for organisations, governments, and stakeholders, enabling them to better respond to GPR and achieve sustainable development.

References

  1. PLoS One. 2023 Jul 21;18(7):e0284237 [PMID: 37478077]
  2. Harv Bus Rev. 2006 Dec;84(12):78-92, 163 [PMID: 17183795]
  3. Risk Anal. 2011 Apr;31(4):515-22 [PMID: 21077926]
  4. Psychol Methods. 2002 Mar;7(1):83-104 [PMID: 11928892]
  5. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Nov;36(4):717-31 [PMID: 15641418]
  6. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82 [PMID: 3806354]
  7. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 May;28(20):25906-25919 [PMID: 33475921]
  8. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(18):51422-51439 [PMID: 36809631]

MeSH Term

Financing, Government
Investments
Humans
China
Government
Politics
Sustainable Development

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0GPRESGperformanceenterprisesimpactinvestorattentiongovernmentsubsidieseffectsgeopoliticalrisksmoderatingsignificantyetexistingliteraturelackscomprehensiveunderstandingaffectsenvironmentalsocialgovernancestudyaddressesgapanalysingdataChineseperiod20092021empiricallyexaminesexploresunderlyingmechanismsSpecificallyanalysisconsidersrolesfactorsresultsindicateinhibitscorporateState-ownedfoundmitigateadverseprivately-ownedtendexacerbateMechanismtestsrevealnegativelyimpactsincreasingfinancingconstraintsreducingfinancialFurthermoreincreasedcanalleviatenegativefindingsoffervaluableinsightsorganisationsgovernmentsstakeholdersenablingbetterrespondachievesustainabledevelopmentmechanismperformance:

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.