Investigating assumptions in motivational interviewing among general practitioners: a qualitative study.

Paul Aujoulat, Amélie Manac'h, Catherine Le Reste, Delphine Le Goff, Jean Yves Le Reste, Marie Barais
Author Information
  1. Paul Aujoulat: Department of General Practice, University of Western Brittany, 22, Av. Camille Desmoulins, FR 29238, Brest, France. aujoulat.paul@yahoo.com.
  2. Amélie Manac'h: Department of General Practice, University of Western Brittany, 22, Av. Camille Desmoulins, FR 29238, Brest, France.
  3. Catherine Le Reste: Department of General Practice, University of Western Brittany, 22, Av. Camille Desmoulins, FR 29238, Brest, France.
  4. Delphine Le Goff: Department of General Practice, University of Western Brittany, 22, Av. Camille Desmoulins, FR 29238, Brest, France.
  5. Jean Yves Le Reste: Department of General Practice, University of Western Brittany, 22, Av. Camille Desmoulins, FR 29238, Brest, France.
  6. Marie Barais: Department of General Practice, University of Western Brittany, 22, Av. Camille Desmoulins, FR 29238, Brest, France.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unhealthy behaviours contributing to cardiovascular issues, diabetes, strokes, and cancer, pose significant health risks. General practitioners (GPs) are pivotal in guiding behaviour change, with Motivational Interviewing (MI) showing promise. MI, developed by William Miller and Stephen Rollnick, aims to enhance motivation for change. Despite its efficacy in areas like smoking cessation and weight loss, its uptake among French GPs remains uncertain.
METHODS: This qualitative study was to explore GPs' understanding of MI, its perceived benefits and the obstacles to its implementation in western Brittany (Finistère). Semi-structured interviews, conducted by two female trainees, explored MI knowledge, benefits, and barriers with a thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Between November 2020 and May 2021, 11 semi-structured interviews were conducted with GPs. Participants had a limited understanding of MI, often confusing it with persuasion. MI was seen as a patient-centered tool fostering behavioural change, with reported benefits in cancer screening, chronic disease management, and vaccination. However, barriers such as time constraints, limited training availability, and systemic issues hinder its adoption. Participants emphasized MI's utility for challenging cases but noted it was unnecessary for engaged patients. MI could also enhance doctor-patient relationships and physician satisfaction. Overcoming barriers requires addressing logistical issues, integrating MI into training, and promoting its long-term efficiency to improve healthcare outcomes.
CONCLUSION: This study highlighted GPs' limited knowledge of MI but recognized its value in promoting patient-centered care and behaviour change. GPs identified its potential in areas like cancer screening, chronic disease management, and vaccine hesitancy while noting barriers such as time constraints and insufficient training. Addressing these challenges through better integration into training and practice could enhance patient outcomes and provider satisfaction. Focused efforts are needed to translate MI's potential into routine clinical use.

Keywords

References

  1. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Apr 26;9:889124 [PMID: 35559348]
  2. J Am Board Fam Med. 2022 Mar-Apr;35(2):420-426 [PMID: 35379731]
  3. PRiMER. 2021 Feb 04;5:7 [PMID: 33860162]
  4. J Health Commun. 2018;23(4):313-320 [PMID: 29474117]
  5. Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Mar;37(2):234-41 [PMID: 24469237]
  6. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Jan;113:103786 [PMID: 33091749]
  7. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2009 Mar;37(2):129-40 [PMID: 19364414]
  8. Public Health Nurs. 2022 May;39(3):618-623 [PMID: 34716618]
  9. Prev Sci. 2021 Aug;22(6):683-688 [PMID: 34283376]
  10. Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Apr;55(513):305-12 [PMID: 15826439]
  11. Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Nov;93(2):157-68 [PMID: 24001658]
  12. Health Educ Behav. 2024 Apr;51(2):260-269 [PMID: 36511084]
  13. BMC Public Health. 2018 Jun 28;18(1):811 [PMID: 29954370]
  14. BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jan 28;23(1):21 [PMID: 35172737]
  15. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Feb 19;118(7):109-115 [PMID: 33835006]
  16. Trials. 2022 Feb 14;23(1):144 [PMID: 35164836]
  17. BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 19;21(1):1422 [PMID: 34281516]
  18. BMC Med Educ. 2024 Aug 8;24(1):856 [PMID: 39118104]

MeSH Term

Humans
Motivational Interviewing
Qualitative Research
General Practitioners
Female
Male
Physician-Patient Relations
Adult
Attitude of Health Personnel
Middle Aged
Interviews as Topic
France

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0MIGPschangebarrierstrainingissuescancerenhancestudybenefitslimitedGeneralpractitionersbehaviourMotivationalareaslikeamongqualitativeGPs'understandinginterviewsconductedknowledgeParticipantspatient-centeredscreeningchronicdiseasemanagementtimeconstraintsMI'ssatisfactionpromotingoutcomespotentialinterviewingBACKGROUND:UnhealthybehaviourscontributingcardiovasculardiabetesstrokesposesignificanthealthriskspivotalguidingInterviewingshowingpromisedevelopedWilliamMillerStephenRollnickaimsmotivationDespiteefficacysmokingcessationweightlossuptakeFrenchremainsuncertainMETHODS:exploreperceivedobstaclesimplementationwesternBrittanyFinistèreSemi-structuredtwofemaletraineesexploredthematicanalysisRESULTS:November2020May202111semi-structuredoftenconfusingpersuasionseentoolfosteringbehaviouralreportedvaccinationHoweveravailabilitysystemichinderadoptionemphasizedutilitychallengingcasesnotedunnecessaryengagedpatientsalsodoctor-patientrelationshipsphysicianOvercomingrequiresaddressinglogisticalintegratinglong-termefficiencyimprovehealthcareCONCLUSION:highlightedrecognizedvaluecareidentifiedvaccinehesitancynotinginsufficientAddressingchallengesbetterintegrationpracticepatientproviderFocusedeffortsneededtranslateroutineclinicaluseInvestigatingassumptionsmotivationalgeneralpractitioners:PatientengagementPreventivemedicine

Similar Articles

Cited By