Impact of in-hospital COVID-19 quarantine policy changes on quality of acute stroke care: a single center experience.

Minkyung Kim, Keon-Joo Lee, Seong-Eun Kim, Hokyu Kim, Jung Hoon Han, Han Jun Kim, Kyungmi Oh, Sung-Jun Park, Chi Kyung Kim, Young-Duck Cho
Author Information
  1. Minkyung Kim: Department of Neurology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  2. Keon-Joo Lee: Department of Neurology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  3. Seong-Eun Kim: Department of Neurology and Cerebrovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
  4. Hokyu Kim: Department of Neurology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  5. Jung Hoon Han: Department of Neurology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  6. Han Jun Kim: Department of Neurology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  7. Kyungmi Oh: Department of Neurology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  8. Sung-Jun Park: Department of Emergency Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  9. Chi Kyung Kim: Department of Neurology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  10. Young-Duck Cho: Department of Emergency Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic is known to impact in-hospital processes for acute stroke patients, potentially resulting in delays due to quarantine and screening measures. The purpose of this study was to determine effects of changes in in-hospital quarantine policies on quality of care for acute stroke patients.
Methods: Hyperacute ischemic stroke patients who were admitted to Korea University Guro Hospital between January 2019 and February 2021 via the emergency department were included in this study. All had neurological symptoms within 6���h before arrival. As a mandatory COVID-19 real-time PCR screening test was implemented in March 2020, changes in quality indicators according to the progress of COVID-19 pandemic and changes in in-hospital quarantine policy, including door-to-image time (DIT), door-to-referral time, door-to-needle time (DNT), door-to-puncture time (DPT), and functional outcomes (discharge and 3-month modified Rankin's scale) were determined.
Results: A total of 268 hyperacute stroke patients were analyzed. The number of hyperacute stroke patients gradually decreased as the pandemic progressed. Time indicators, including door-to-referral time, DIT, and DPT during the pandemic were increased. When pre-and post-COVID-19 screening epochs were compared, DIT, door-to-neurologist referral time, and DPT showed numerical increases. However, after accounting for potential confounders, a significant delay in DIT was found to be associated with the in-hospital COVID-19 quarantine policy.
Discussion: Our study showed that enhancing in-hospital COVID-19 quarantine measures might increase the response time for hyperacute stroke care, suggesting an impact on the quality of care.

Keywords

References

  1. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 24;3:CD013705 [PMID: 33760236]
  2. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2021 Apr;8(4):929-937 [PMID: 33616305]
  3. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Apr;16(2):464-467 [PMID: 33040761]
  4. JAMA Neurol. 2014 Sep;71(9):1155-61 [PMID: 25023407]
  5. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Jun;27(6):1539-1545 [PMID: 29422380]
  6. Front Neurol. 2022 Oct 20;13:998758 [PMID: 36341110]
  7. J Stroke. 2020 May;22(2):203-205 [PMID: 32392907]
  8. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2022 Jan;212:107027 [PMID: 34839154]
  9. Epidemiology. 1990 Jan;1(1):43-6 [PMID: 2081237]
  10. Stroke. 1993 Jan;24(1):35-41 [PMID: 7678184]
  11. Stroke. 2020 Jun;51(6):1891-1895 [PMID: 32233980]
  12. JAMA. 2015 Apr 14;313(14):1451-62 [PMID: 25871671]
  13. J Neurointerv Surg. 2022 Jul;14(7):642-649 [PMID: 35387860]
  14. BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Jun 13;22(1):536 [PMID: 35692041]
  15. JAMA. 2020 Aug 25;324(8):782-793 [PMID: 32648899]
  16. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014 Sep;23(8):2122-2129 [PMID: 25106830]
  17. Stroke. 2013 Mar;44(3):870-947 [PMID: 23370205]
  18. Stroke. 2016 Sep;47(9):2373-9 [PMID: 27507856]
  19. JAMA. 2000 Jun 21;283(23):3102-9 [PMID: 10865305]
  20. Stroke. 2020 Jul;51(7):2228-2231 [PMID: 32432998]
  21. Pathol Res Pract. 2021 May;221:153443 [PMID: 33930607]
  22. Viruses. 2020 Dec 10;12(12): [PMID: 33322035]
  23. Stroke. 2012 May;43(5):1279-84 [PMID: 22442169]
  24. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013 Feb;22(2):149-53 [PMID: 21903419]
  25. BMJ. 1998 Apr 18;316(7139):1236-8 [PMID: 9553006]
  26. J Infect Public Health. 2021 Jul;14(7):949-953 [PMID: 34130118]
  27. JAMA. 2020 Jun 2;323(21):2170-2184 [PMID: 32484532]
  28. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 21;17(24): [PMID: 33371309]
  29. BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Jul 26;22(1):136 [PMID: 35883030]
  30. Front Neurol. 2022 Apr 11;13:826061 [PMID: 35481269]
  31. Stroke. 2020 Sep;51(9):e2111-e2114 [PMID: 32639860]
  32. J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Dec 21;35(49):e429 [PMID: 33350187]
  33. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021;50(6):715-721 [PMID: 34247153]
  34. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022 Jan;31(1):106179 [PMID: 34735901]
  35. Lancet. 2016 Apr 23;387(10029):1723-31 [PMID: 26898852]
  36. Virol J. 2020 Nov 13;17(1):177 [PMID: 33187528]
  37. Front Neurol. 2023 Jul 10;14:1155931 [PMID: 37492852]
  38. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Feb;49(1):487-493 [PMID: 36066585]
  39. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 20;18(8): [PMID: 33924096]

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By