The state of remote learning in plastic surgery: A systematic review of modalities.

Akshilkumar Patel, Sameer Massand, John Ingraham
Author Information
  1. Akshilkumar Patel: College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, 700 HMC Crescent Road, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
  2. Sameer Massand: Division of Plastic Surgery, Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation, and Humanities, Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
  3. John Ingraham: Division of Plastic Surgery, Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation, and Humanities, Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.

Abstract

Objective: To systematically review the published literature describing remote alternative educational modalities for plastic surgery residents.
Design: Systematic review.
Setting: Independent investigators performed searches in the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases using a variety of MeSH terms and search term combinations. These studies were evaluated for inclusion based on PRISMA criteria.
Participants: Literature searches were performed from June to December 2020, and articles were collected if they met the inclusion criteria. Studies were also qualitatively assessed to determine whether the described education modality demonstrated high fidelity (anatomic accuracy and similarity to true surgery) and efficacy (improved trainee performance in a standardized skills evaluation). Initial database searches resulted in 2,849 total articles. Of these, 451 articles were deemed relevant for screening, and after applying additional exclusion criteria, 202 articles were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 66 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis. Articles were organized into three broad categories: physical models ( = 42, 63.7%), virtual simulators ( = 16, 24.2%), and online resources ( = 8, 12.1%). Among the physical models, we identified 15 high fidelity, 20 high efficacy, 5 high fidelity and high efficacy, and 2 high efficacy but low fidelity models. Among the virtual simulators, 6 demonstrated high fidelity, 8 high efficacy, and 2 demonstrated both values. Among the online resources, 3 showed high fidelity and 3 showed high efficacy.
Conclusions: A variety of remote training modalities have been published, including articles describing virtual surgical simulators, virtual and physical anatomic models, and online resources with video modules. Further investigation is needed to evaluate how effectively training received through remote means translates to practice in live clinical scenarios in the operating room.
ACGME competency addressed: Practice-based Learning and Improvement.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Dec;33(8):740-50 [PMID: 15556320]
  2. Ann Plast Surg. 2019 Dec;83(6):697-701 [PMID: 31232823]
  3. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(2):e140-3 [PMID: 24621754]
  4. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Aug;63(8):1323-8 [PMID: 19596624]
  5. In Vivo. 2020 Jun;34(3 Suppl):1603-1611 [PMID: 32503818]
  6. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Sep 24;8(9):e3107 [PMID: 33133956]
  7. J Pak Med Assoc. 2019 Feb;69(Suppl 1)(1):S62-S68 [PMID: 30697022]
  8. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Feb;139(2):455e-465e [PMID: 28121879]
  9. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2014 Summer;22(2):75-8 [PMID: 25114616]
  10. J Neurosurg. 2016 Oct;125(4):915-928 [PMID: 26799298]
  11. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2019 Jan 1;21(1):77-79 [PMID: 30383093]
  12. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2016 Sep;32(7):556-61 [PMID: 27303937]
  13. J Surg Educ. 2018 Mar - Apr;75(2):442-449 [PMID: 29033271]
  14. J Am Coll Surg. 1999 Jul;189(1):114-27 [PMID: 10401747]
  15. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Dec;126(6):328e-330e [PMID: 21124120]
  16. Microsurgery. 2005;25(6):500-1 [PMID: 16134096]
  17. Adv Simul (Lond). 2018 Jul 18;3:14 [PMID: 30038804]
  18. Laryngoscope. 2015 Mar;125(3):571-6 [PMID: 25417605]
  19. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Jul;163(1):38-41 [PMID: 32312158]
  20. Chir Main. 2014 Apr;33(2):106-11 [PMID: 24603055]
  21. JAMA Surg. 2013 Sep;148(9):829-33 [PMID: 23843028]
  22. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Feb;40 Suppl 1:S70-81 [PMID: 21453665]
  23. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59(1):107-8 [PMID: 16482802]
  24. Mil Med. 2018 Mar 1;183(suppl_1):86-91 [PMID: 29635551]
  25. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2013 Aug;33(4):273-81 [PMID: 24043916]
  26. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016 Feb;40(1):174-81 [PMID: 26715575]
  27. Chir Main. 2015 Jun;34(3):109-12 [PMID: 25964220]
  28. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Nov;146(5):1100-1102 [PMID: 33136955]
  29. J Surg Educ. 2016 Sep-Oct;73(5):819-30 [PMID: 27184181]
  30. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2013 Apr;37(2):166-70 [PMID: 22795317]
  31. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jun;141(6):1485-1500 [PMID: 29579024]
  32. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Dec;126(6):324e-326e [PMID: 21124117]
  33. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 Feb;67(2):e42-8 [PMID: 24094541]
  34. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Jun 1;28(11):e456-e464 [PMID: 32282439]
  35. World Neurosurg. 2019 May;125:433-442 [PMID: 30716484]
  36. Plast Surg Int. 2015;2015:187505 [PMID: 26609429]
  37. Ann Plast Surg. 2018 Sep;81(3):250-256 [PMID: 29905604]
  38. Int J Med Robot. 2014 Mar;10(1):78-87 [PMID: 23720249]
  39. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Jul;70(7):893-900 [PMID: 28526634]
  40. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Apr;75(4):775-785 [PMID: 28012843]
  41. Microsurgery. 2002;22(8):324-8 [PMID: 12497566]
  42. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2017 Oct 11;2(6):471-474 [PMID: 29299526]
  43. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019 Apr;56(4):432-437 [PMID: 30092650]
  44. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Apr;141(4):324-8 [PMID: 25695900]
  45. Arch Plast Surg. 2017 Jul;44(4):293-300 [PMID: 28728324]
  46. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Apr;70(4):478-486 [PMID: 28161208]
  47. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jul;132(1):101e-109e [PMID: 23806929]
  48. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Oct;138(4):739e-747e [PMID: 27673544]
  49. ANZ J Surg. 2019 Nov;89(11):1364-1365 [PMID: 31760701]
  50. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016 Jun;69(6):783-788 [PMID: 27105545]
  51. Microsurgery. 2010 Sep;30(6):479-86 [PMID: 20201052]
  52. Microsurgery. 1998;18(7):430-1 [PMID: 9880160]
  53. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2016 Apr;230(4):310-25 [PMID: 26994117]
  54. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2016 Mar;32(3):233-41 [PMID: 26645156]
  55. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2005 Aug;33(4):223-8 [PMID: 15975810]
  56. JAMA. 2014 Dec 10;312(22):2374-84 [PMID: 25490328]
  57. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013 Apr;37(2):454-8 [PMID: 23397059]
  58. Eur J Plast Surg. 2018;41(4):439-446 [PMID: 30100677]
  59. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 May;137(5):1569-1581 [PMID: 27119930]
  60. Ann Plast Surg. 2019 Sep;83(3):340-343 [PMID: 31008789]
  61. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Nov;142(5):1300-1304 [PMID: 30511984]
  62. Ann Surg. 2017 May;265(5):923-929 [PMID: 28398961]
  63. J Hand Microsurg. 2014 Dec;6(2):110-2 [PMID: 25414564]
  64. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jan;139(1):85e-96e [PMID: 28027241]
  65. Simul Healthc. 2016 Feb;11(1):60-4 [PMID: 26836467]
  66. Laryngoscope. 2017 Nov;127(11):2490-2494 [PMID: 28407264]
  67. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2019 Jan;35(1):15-21 [PMID: 29996154]
  68. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Oct;113:292-297 [PMID: 30174004]
  69. J Neurosurg. 2014 Aug;121(2):277-84 [PMID: 24905563]
  70. J Surg Educ. 2013 Jul-Aug;70(4):466-74 [PMID: 23725934]
  71. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Feb;137(2):445e-452e [PMID: 26818334]
  72. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jan;141(1):91e-98e [PMID: 29280875]
  73. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Oct;138(4):730e-738e [PMID: 27673543]
  74. Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Apr;68(4):410-4 [PMID: 22421490]
  75. Microsurgery. 2006;26(1):4-7 [PMID: 16444711]
  76. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Jun 3;97(11):950-5 [PMID: 26041858]
  77. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jan;143(1):202-209 [PMID: 30325894]
  78. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2012 Oct;28(8):539-42 [PMID: 22744902]
  79. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Jan;109(1):258-63 [PMID: 11786823]
  80. Surgeon. 2016 Jun;14(3):150-63 [PMID: 26577145]
  81. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Feb;74(2):407-447 [PMID: 32891551]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0higharticlesfidelityefficacymodelsreviewremotecriteriavirtualmodalitiessurgerysearchesinclusiondemonstrated2physicalsimulatorsonlineresourcesAmongpublisheddescribingplasticSystematicperformedvarietymetassessededucationanatomic3showedtrainingObjective:systematicallyliteraturealternativeeducationalresidentsDesign:Setting:IndependentinvestigatorsPubMedCochraneLibrarydatabasesusingMeSHtermssearchtermcombinationsstudiesevaluatedbasedPRISMAParticipants:LiteratureJuneDecember2020collectedStudiesalsoqualitativelydeterminewhetherdescribedmodalityaccuracysimilaritytrueimprovedtraineeperformancestandardizedskillsevaluationInitialdatabaseresulted849total451deemedrelevantscreeningapplyingadditionalexclusion202eligibility66includedqualitativesynthesisArticlesorganizedthreebroadcategories: = 42637% = 16242% = 8121%identified15205low68valuesConclusions:includingsurgicalvideomodulesinvestigationneededevaluateeffectivelyreceivedmeanstranslatespracticeliveclinicalscenariosoperatingroomACGMEcompetencyaddressed:Practice-basedLearningImprovementstatelearningsurgery:systematicOnlinePlasticSurgicalVirtualsimulation

Similar Articles

Cited By