Interventions That Failed: Factors Associated with the Continuation of Bullying After a Targeted Intervention.

Eerika Johander, Tiina Turunen, Claire F Garandeau, Christina Salmivalli
Author Information
  1. Eerika Johander: INVEST Flagship Research Center/Department of Psychology and Speech-Language Pathology, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland. ORCID
  2. Tiina Turunen: INVEST Flagship Research Center/Department of Psychology and Speech-Language Pathology, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland.
  3. Claire F Garandeau: INVEST Flagship Research Center/Department of Psychology and Speech-Language Pathology, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland.
  4. Christina Salmivalli: INVEST Flagship Research Center/Department of Psychology and Speech-Language Pathology, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland.

Abstract

We examined how often teachers' targeted interventions fail in stopping bullying and to what extent this varies between schools vs. between students involved. In addition, we investigated which student-level factors were associated with intervention failure. Data were collected annually in 2011-2016 via online questionnaires and included responses from students in 2107 Finnish primary and secondary schools implementing the KiVa antibullying program. During the years of the study, 27% of the 57,835 students who were victims in the cases of bullying addressed by adults reported no improvement in their situation. Among the 44,918 bullying perpetrators who were targeted by an intervention, 21% said they did not bully less as a result. Intervention failures were mostly due to differences between individuals: only 3-12% of the total variance in continued victimization and bullying was due to between-school differences. According to two-level logistic regression results, victim-perceived failure was more likely when the victimized student was in higher grades, had been victimized more frequently and, for a longer time, had been victimized also online, had bullied others, and had fewer friends in the class. Bully-perceived failure was more likely when the bullying student was in higher grades, bullied more frequently, and was victimized. Finally, the bullying students' antibullying attitudes and their perception of teacher's and parents' antibullying attitudes were negatively associated with failure of the intervention.

Keywords

References

  1. Dev Psychol. 1999 Jan;35(1):94-101 [PMID: 9923467]
  2. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2019 Mar-Apr;48(2):218-227 [PMID: 28010134]
  3. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2021 Jan-Apr;21(1):100191 [PMID: 33363579]
  4. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2012 Jan;82(1):67-74 [PMID: 22239395]
  5. Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 05;17(2):e1143 [PMID: 37131921]
  6. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2013;42(6):820-33 [PMID: 23659182]
  7. Dev Psychol. 2005 Jul;41(4):672-82 [PMID: 16060813]
  8. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2000 May;41(4):441-55 [PMID: 10836674]
  9. Prev Sci. 2016 Nov;17(8):1034-1043 [PMID: 27696275]
  10. J Sch Psychol. 2021 Apr;85:37-56 [PMID: 33715780]
  11. Prev Med. 2015 Apr;73:100-5 [PMID: 25657168]
  12. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 30;17(7): [PMID: 32235651]
  13. Prev Sci. 2021 Apr;22(3):299-310 [PMID: 33098542]
  14. Pediatrics. 2003 Dec;112(6 Pt 1):1231-7 [PMID: 14654590]
  15. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011 Dec;79(6):796-805 [PMID: 21967491]
  16. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2014 Aug;42(6):981-91 [PMID: 24615005]
  17. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2015 Jan;43(1):61-76 [PMID: 24390403]
  18. Child Dev. 2011 Jan-Feb;82(1):311-30 [PMID: 21291444]
  19. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2013;42(4):442-53 [PMID: 23384048]
  20. J Soc Psychol. 1991 Oct;131(5):615-27 [PMID: 1798296]
  21. Br J Health Psychol. 2019 May;24(2):241-249 [PMID: 30945793]
  22. J Youth Adolesc. 2022 Aug;51(8):1568-1580 [PMID: 35430720]
  23. Int J Public Health. 2020 Jan;65(1):75-85 [PMID: 31844919]
  24. Prev Sci. 2023 Nov;24(8):1435-1446 [PMID: 35796879]
  25. Health Educ Res. 2005 Feb;20(1):81-91 [PMID: 15253993]
  26. Aggress Behav. 2017 Sep;43(5):430-439 [PMID: 28181256]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0bullyingfailurevictimizedstudentsinterventionantibullyingInterventiontargetedschoolsassociatedonlineduedifferenceslikelystudenthighergradesfrequentlybulliedattitudesBullyingexaminedoftenteachers'interventionsfailstoppingextentvariesvsinvolvedadditioninvestigatedstudent-levelfactorsDatacollectedannually2011-2016viaquestionnairesincludedresponses2107FinnishprimarysecondaryimplementingKiVaprogramyearsstudy27%57835victimscasesaddressedadultsreportedimprovementsituationAmong44918perpetrators21%saidbullylessresultfailuresmostlyindividuals:3-12%totalvariancecontinuedvictimizationbetween-schoolAccordingtwo-levellogisticregressionresultsvictim-perceivedlongertimealsoothersfewerfriendsclassBully-perceivedFinallystudents'perceptionteacher'sparents'negativelyInterventionsFailed:FactorsAssociatedContinuationTargetedSchoolVictimization

Similar Articles

Cited By