Association of Hospital Consolidation with Cancer Outcomes.

Justin Graff, Mahnoor Ayub, Prashanth Prabakaran, Brendan Keelan, John D Cramer
Author Information
  1. Justin Graff: Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA. ORCID
  2. Mahnoor Ayub: Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
  3. Prashanth Prabakaran: Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
  4. Brendan Keelan: Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, East Lansing, MI, USA.
  5. John D Cramer: Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.

Abstract

Hospital mergers have increased significantly since 2010, driven by factors such as healthcare policy changes, reimbursement, economies of scale, and quality improvement goals. However, limited evidence exists about how these mergers affect the quality of care and cancer outcomes. We conducted a difference-in-differences analysis to assess the impact of hospital consolidation on cancer outcomes. Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program, we identified cancer patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2016, then used the Health Cost Institute's Healthy Marketplace Index to assess hospital consolidation as measured by the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI). The HHI is a measure of market concentration and competition between firms in a given industry. We found that increases in hospital consolidation were associated with a higher likelihood of early-stage cancer diagnosis compared to control areas (-1.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.3 to 0.0%), and improved overall survival (hazard ratio 0.94, CI 0.90-0.98). These improvements were restricted to cancers with screening recommendations. Our study suggests that hospital consolidation may have some benefits for cancer patients. However, these benefits may not be evenly distributed across all cancer types. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and to understand the mechanisms by which hospital consolidation affects cancer outcomes.

Keywords

References

  1. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2142382 [PMID: 34989794]
  2. JAMA. 2013 Nov 13;310(18):1964-70 [PMID: 24219952]
  3. Q J Econ. 2019 Feb;134(1):51-107 [PMID: 32981974]
  4. Ann Intern Med. 2005 May 17;142(10):847-54 [PMID: 15897535]
  5. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2124662 [PMID: 34542619]
  6. N Engl J Med. 2020 Jan 2;382(1):51-59 [PMID: 31893515]
  7. J Clin Outcomes Manag. 2014 Aug 1;21(8):364-371 [PMID: 25960631]
  8. Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun;47(3 Pt 1):1008-29 [PMID: 22098308]
  9. J Health Econ. 2017 Mar;52:74-94 [PMID: 28236720]
  10. JAMA. 2015 Oct 6;314(13):1337-8 [PMID: 26270867]
  11. Med Care Res Rev. 2004 Sep;61(3):247-331 [PMID: 15358969]
  12. Med Care. 2002 Aug;40(8 Suppl):IV-3-18 [PMID: 12187163]
  13. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Mar-Apr;23(2):175-81 [PMID: 15046141]
  14. J Health Econ. 2000 Sep;19(5):767-91 [PMID: 11184804]

MeSH Term

Humans
Neoplasms
Male
Female
Health Facility Merger
SEER Program
Middle Aged
Aged
United States
Quality of Health Care

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0cancerhospitalconsolidationoutcomesIndex0HospitalmergersqualityHowevercareassesspatientsHHIdiagnosisCImaybenefitsincreasedsignificantlysince2010drivenfactorshealthcarepolicychangesreimbursementeconomiesscaleimprovementgoalslimitedevidenceexistsaffectconducteddifference-in-differencesanalysisimpactUsingdataSurveillanceEpidemiologyEndResultsSEERprogramidentifieddiagnosed20082016usedHealthCostInstitute'sHealthyMarketplacemeasuredHerfindahl-Hirschmanmeasuremarketconcentrationcompetitionfirmsgivenindustryfoundincreasesassociatedhigherlikelihoodearly-stagecomparedcontrolareas-11%95%confidenceinterval-230%improvedoverallsurvivalhazardratio9490-098improvementsrestrictedcancersscreeningrecommendationsstudysuggestsevenlydistributedacrosstypesresearchneededconfirmfindingsunderstandmechanismsaffectsAssociationConsolidationCancerOutcomesHerfindahl–Hirschmanmortalityoncologic

Similar Articles

Cited By