Optimizing Clinical Postgraduate Training: Perspectives of Postgraduate Alumni Regarding Their Residency Training at Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Uganda.

Leevan Tibaijuka, Lorna Atimango, Jonathan Kajjimu, Asiphas Owaraganise, Nixon Kamukama, Paul Kalyebara Kato, Godfrey Rwambuka Mugyenyi, Musa Kayondo, Adeline Adwoa Boatin, Joseph Ngonzi
Author Information
  1. Leevan Tibaijuka: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda. ORCID
  2. Lorna Atimango: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
  3. Jonathan Kajjimu: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda. ORCID
  4. Asiphas Owaraganise: Clinical Division, Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
  5. Nixon Kamukama: Office of the Deputy Vice Chancellor Academic Affairs, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
  6. Paul Kalyebara Kato: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
  7. Godfrey Rwambuka Mugyenyi: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda. ORCID
  8. Musa Kayondo: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
  9. Adeline Adwoa Boatin: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  10. Joseph Ngonzi: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.

Abstract

Background: Understanding alumni satisfaction and the competencies gained during university training can guide improvements in education quality, particularly in higher education institutions. This study at Mbarara University of Science and Technology (MUST) explored the factors influencing alumni decisions, their residency experiences, and their levels of satisfaction. Additionally, it provided recommendations for improving graduate training programs.
Methods: We conducted a mixed methods study from June to September 2022, employing an online survey and in-depth interviews (IDIs). The survey was distributed via Email and WhatsApp to MUST residency alumni, with 12 participants selected for IDIs. Descriptive summary statistics and thematic analysis were used to analyze the data.
Results: Ninety-five MUST alumni (34.3% response rate) participated, predominantly males (80%), aged 31-40 (69%), and Ugandans (72%). Most graduated after 2018 (83%) in surgical specialties such as obstetrics/gynecology (38%) and general surgery (19%). Factors influencing residency program choice included practice-oriented study programs (61%), fields of specialization (55%), university or departmental reputation (46%), and admission standards (32%). While 80% were satisfied with the learning and teaching, only 50% expressed satisfaction with the infrastructure. IDIs revealed satisfaction due to compassionate faculty and strong university partnerships but criticized limited study facilities, difficult adaptation for international students, insufficient hands-on training, human resource shortages, and limited technology. Recommendations included collaborative mentorship, increased hands-on training exposure, more partnerships, and enhanced infrastructure and technology support.
Conclusion: Most alumni were satisfied with their residency training despite infrastructure dissatisfaction, finding it well-aligned with their work and beneficial for their careers. Our study highlights opportunities for implementing proposed improvements to enhance residency training. It suggests that similar universities should conduct post-graduate tracers to evaluate trainee experiences and inform future directions.

Keywords

References

  1. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Sep;97(9):673-678 [PMID: 29642078]
  2. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2022 Dec 20;14(1):e1-e12 [PMID: 36546495]
  3. Arch Surg. 2005 Aug;140(8):795-800 [PMID: 16106579]
  4. Cureus. 2023 Jun 6;15(6):e40044 [PMID: 37425588]
  5. Acad Med. 2014 Dec;89(12):1687-93 [PMID: 25054415]
  6. J Grad Med Educ. 2011 Sep;3(3):367-71 [PMID: 22942964]
  7. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022 May 26;13:555-566 [PMID: 35651478]
  8. BMC Med Educ. 2023 Dec 15;23(1):965 [PMID: 38102623]
  9. BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 7;9(3):e022097 [PMID: 30850399]
  10. Med Teach. 2018 Sep;40(9):920-927 [PMID: 29228837]
  11. BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 8;21(1):444 [PMID: 34496834]
  12. Healthc (Amst). 2022 Mar;10(1):100614 [PMID: 35114599]
  13. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Mar 20;4(3):e0003021 [PMID: 38507339]
  14. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Sep;13(9):1121-5 [PMID: 27245995]
  15. Hum Resour Health. 2022 May 7;20(1):37 [PMID: 35525955]
  16. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2011 Mar 09;11 Suppl 1:S7 [PMID: 21411007]
  17. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021 Oct 07;12:1175-1183 [PMID: 34675744]
  18. Singapore Med J. 2018 Dec;59(12):642-646 [PMID: 29546432]
  19. Can Fam Physician. 1996 Feb;42:213-6 [PMID: 9222568]
  20. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2022 Mar 14;14(1):e1-e13 [PMID: 35384683]
  21. Nurs Open. 2019 Apr 07;6(3):733-739 [PMID: 31367394]
  22. World J Surg. 2013 Aug;37(8):1836-40 [PMID: 23609345]
  23. PLoS One. 2021 Aug 30;16(8):e0256402 [PMID: 34460837]

Grants

  1. D43 TW011632/FIC NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0trainingstudyresidencyalumnisatisfactionMUSTuniversityIDIsinfrastructureimprovementseducationMbararaUniversityScienceTechnologyinfluencingexperiencesrecommendationsprogramssurvey80%choiceincludedsatisfiedpartnershipslimitedhands-ontechnologyPostgraduateUgandaBackground:UnderstandingcompetenciesgainedcanguidequalityparticularlyhigherinstitutionsexploredfactorsdecisionslevelsAdditionallyprovidedimprovinggraduateMethods:conductedmixedmethodsJuneSeptember2022employingonlinein-depthinterviewsdistributedviaEmailWhatsApp12participantsselectedDescriptivesummarystatisticsthematicanalysisusedanalyzedataResults:Ninety-five343%responserateparticipatedpredominantlymalesaged31-4069%Ugandans72%graduated201883%surgicalspecialtiesobstetrics/gynecology38%generalsurgery19%Factorsprogrampractice-oriented61%fieldsspecialization55%departmentalreputation46%admissionstandards32%learningteaching50%expressedrevealedduecompassionatefacultystrongcriticizedfacilitiesdifficultadaptationinternationalstudentsinsufficienthumanresourceshortagesRecommendationscollaborativementorshipincreasedexposureenhancedsupportConclusion:despitedissatisfactionfindingwell-alignedworkbeneficialcareershighlightsopportunitiesimplementingproposedenhancesuggestssimilaruniversitiesconductpost-graduatetracersevaluatetraineeinformfuturedirectionsOptimizingClinicalTraining:PerspectivesAlumniRegardingResidencyTraininggraduatesperspectivesimprovementtracer

Similar Articles

Cited By