Recognizing and addressing burnout among healthcare workers in rural Nepal: a proof-of-concept study using Kern's six-step theoretical framework.

Raj Kumar Dangal, Eva Studer, Tula Krishna Gupta, Kristin Nguyen, Amit Suneja, Karuna Khadka, Shailina Bata Shrestha, Bibhav Acharya
Author Information
  1. Raj Kumar Dangal: Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu University Hospital/Dhulikhel Hospital, Dhulikhel, 45200, Nepal. drkdangal@gmail.com.
  2. Eva Studer: HEAL Fellow, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA.
  3. Tula Krishna Gupta: HEAL Fellow, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA.
  4. Kristin Nguyen: HEAL Fellow, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA.
  5. Amit Suneja: HEAL Fellow, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA.
  6. Karuna Khadka: Pokhara Academy of Health Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal.
  7. Shailina Bata Shrestha: Bode Dental Clinic, Bhaktapur, Nepal.
  8. Bibhav Acharya: University of California, San Francisco, USA.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare provider burnout is highly prevalent and has negative consequences. However, many healthcare workers in LMICs, including Nepal, rarely recognize or ameliorate it. This problem is worse in rural settings. Competency-focused interventions that are developed using theoretical frameworks can address this gap.
METHODS: We used Kern's framework of curriculum development to create, refine, and assess a theory-driven intervention tailored to the needs and constraints of rural healthcare workers in Nepal. During the first phase, we conducted a targeted needs assessment using an online survey among nine rural primary care physicians working in Charikot Hospital. We then developed learning objectives for knowledge, attitude, and skills domains based on the World Health Organization (WHO) definition of burnout. Then, we created animated educational videos designed to meet the learning objectives. We then implemented the educational intervention with rural physicians and assessed their knowledge, attitudes, and feedback. During the second phase, we further developed the intervention based on findings from the first phase and assessed acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary impact using pre- and post-intervention questionnaires and key informant interviews.
RESULTS: In the first phase, nine physicians participated in the targeted needs assessment, and eight responded to the post-intervention assessment. In the second phase, 18 attendees completed the pre-intervention burnout assessment, and 16 completed both the pre-test and post-test questionnaires. On the pre-test, correct answers across questions ranged from 31-88%, while on the post-test, participants responded correctly 88-100% of the time. Related-samples Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed a statistically significant difference (P = 0.007) in the post-test scores on the knowledge domain. Qualitative results showed burnout as an unrecognized and unreported issue, and its drivers included stigma and feelings of helplessness. Participants praised the interventions and reported that they translated learned skills into practice.
CONCLUSION: In this proof-of-concept study, we found that educational interventions developed using a theory-driven framework to meet the unique needs of rural healthcare workers are acceptable and feasible. Future studies can test the intervention impact in well-powered trials to support scale-up efforts to identify and address burnout.

Keywords

References

  1. Psychiatr Serv. 2019 Oct 1;70(10):867-873 [PMID: 31337325]
  2. N Engl J Med. 2022 Aug 18;387(7):577-579 [PMID: 35830683]
  3. Int J Qual Health Care. 2023 Sep 13;35(3): [PMID: 37698917]
  4. Dialogues Health. 2024 Feb 19;4:100173 [PMID: 38516225]
  5. Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 6;13(1):10971 [PMID: 37414811]
  6. JAMA. 2018 Sep 18;320(11):1131-1150 [PMID: 30326495]
  7. Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 25;13:845138 [PMID: 35546948]
  8. Gates Open Res. 2018 Jun 11;2:4 [PMID: 29984356]
  9. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Mar;16(3):311-317 [PMID: 28669661]
  10. Lancet. 2022 Jun 4;399(10341):2129-2154 [PMID: 35617980]
  11. PLoS One. 2021 Jun 24;16(6):e0253808 [PMID: 34166466]
  12. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2022 Sep;68(6):1218-1222 [PMID: 35549470]
  13. BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 15;20(1):298 [PMID: 32539732]
  14. Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2024 Apr 10;26:100407 [PMID: 38633708]
  15. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Mar 12;76:103437 [PMID: 35308433]
  16. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 17;17(1):491 [PMID: 28716142]
  17. Psychol Health Med. 2009 Dec;14(6):654-66 [PMID: 20183538]
  18. Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2017 May 2;4:e8 [PMID: 28596909]
  19. Ann Glob Health. 2018 Nov 05;84(4):717-726 [PMID: 30779522]
  20. Res Nurs Health. 2010 Aug;33(4):288-98 [PMID: 20645421]
  21. Radiologia (Engl Ed). 2022 Mar-Apr;64(2):119-127 [PMID: 35504677]
  22. Front Public Health. 2021 Oct 29;9:750529 [PMID: 34778184]
  23. Health Sci Rep. 2023 May 04;6(5):e1256 [PMID: 37152234]
  24. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 2;22(1):284 [PMID: 35236354]
  25. Arch Surg. 2011 Jan;146(1):54-62 [PMID: 21242446]
  26. Lancet. 2016 Nov 5;388(10057):2272-2281 [PMID: 27692469]
  27. Cureus. 2018 Dec 4;10(12):e3681 [PMID: 30761233]
  28. Acad Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;40(4):667-71 [PMID: 27259491]
  29. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 Dec;88(12):1358-67 [PMID: 24290109]
  30. BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Nov;9(4): [PMID: 33208306]
  31. BMC Public Health. 2019 Sep 11;19(1):1247 [PMID: 31510975]
  32. J Educ Perioper Med. 2019 Jan 01;21(1):E634 [PMID: 31406705]
  33. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jul 28;14:325 [PMID: 25066375]
  34. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Sep 2;149(5):334-41 [PMID: 18765703]
  35. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2022 Apr 28;9:23821205221096370 [PMID: 35509682]
  36. Workplace Health Saf. 2015 Oct;63(10):462-70; quiz 471 [PMID: 26419795]
  37. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2015 May-Aug;28(2):138-41 [PMID: 26609014]
  38. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 22;17(3): [PMID: 31979154]
  39. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2019 Jul 31;33:77 [PMID: 31696071]
  40. J Prim Care Community Health. 2023 Jan-Dec;14:21501319231178641 [PMID: 37246649]
  41. Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec;48(6 Pt 2):2134-56 [PMID: 24279835]
  42. BMJ Open. 2014 Feb 25;4(2):e004185 [PMID: 24568961]
  43. Bull World Health Organ. 2022 Jun 1;100(6):385-401A [PMID: 35694622]

MeSH Term

Humans
Nepal
Burnout, Professional
Male
Female
Surveys and Questionnaires
Rural Health Services
Needs Assessment
Adult
Proof of Concept Study
Health Personnel
Curriculum

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0burnoutruralusingphasehealthcareworkersdevelopedinterventionneedsassessmentinterventionsframeworkfirstphysicianslearningknowledgeeducationalpost-testNepaltheoreticalcanaddressKern'stheory-driventargetedamongnineobjectivesskillsbasedmeetassessedsecondimpactpost-interventionquestionnairesrespondedcompletedpre-testtestshowedproof-of-conceptstudyINTRODUCTION:HealthcareproviderhighlyprevalentnegativeconsequencesHowevermanyLMICsincludingrarelyrecognizeameliorateproblemworsesettingsCompetency-focusedframeworksgapMETHODS:usedcurriculumdevelopmentcreaterefineassesstailoredconstraintsconductedonlinesurveyprimarycareworkingCharikotHospitalattitudedomainsWorldHealthOrganizationWHOdefinitioncreatedanimatedvideosdesignedimplementedattitudesfeedbackfindingsacceptabilityfeasibilitypreliminarypre-keyinformantinterviewsRESULTS:participatedeight18attendeespre-intervention16correctanswersacrossquestionsranged31-88%participantscorrectly88-100%timeRelated-samplesWilcoxonsigned-rankstatisticallysignificantdifferenceP = 0007scoresdomainQualitativeresultsunrecognizedunreportedissuedriversincludedstigmafeelingshelplessnessParticipantspraisedreportedtranslatedlearnedpracticeCONCLUSION:founduniqueacceptablefeasibleFuturestudieswell-poweredtrialssupportscale-upeffortsidentifyRecognizingaddressingNepal:six-stepBurnoutLMICRuralsettingVisualaids

Similar Articles

Cited By