Stress and Interpersonal Relationships in Medical Students During Public Health Emergencies: A Network Analysis.

Yi Cui, Zhihua Guo, Tianqi Yang, Man Zhang, Hezi Mu, Jiayao Li, Jiaxin Fang, Tianshu Du, Xiaomei Yang
Author Information
  1. Yi Cui: Department of Nursing, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China. ORCID
  2. Zhihua Guo: Department of Military Medical Psychology, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
  3. Tianqi Yang: Department of Military Medical Psychology, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
  4. Man Zhang: Department of Nursing, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
  5. Hezi Mu: Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
  6. Jiayao Li: Department of Nursing, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China. ORCID
  7. Jiaxin Fang: Department of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China. ORCID
  8. Tianshu Du: Department of Nursing, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
  9. Xiaomei Yang: Department of Gynecology, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.

Abstract

Background: With the growing demand for medical services worldwide, especially during public health emergencies, medical students, as a special group of future medical workers, are important for the development of health services, and they therefore experience more stress than ordinary college students do. The mental health of medical students plays a vital role in their training, and interpersonal relationships are an important factor affecting their stress levels.
Purpose: This study aims to investigate the network structure of stress and interpersonal relationships among Chinese medical students and identify bridge variables to prevent and relieve this stress.
Patients and Methods: A self-report measurement taken from the Sociodemographic Questionnaire, Stress Scale for College Students and Interpersonal Relationship Synthetic Diagnosis Test was administered to 322 Chinese medical students from January to April 2022. Network analysis was used to determine the network structure, and the bridge expected influence (BEI) was identified as the bridge variable.
Results: A total of 6.83% of the medical students experienced high levels of stress, and 31.06% of the medical students experienced various degrees of interpersonal distress. The edges across the community associated with stress and interpersonal relationships were all positive. The edges between S1 "personal hassle" and R3 "dealing with people", S2 "academic hassle" and R2 "socializing", and S3 "negative life event" and R4 "dating someone of the opposite sex" were the strongest. S1 "personal hassle" had the greatest BEI of the stress community (0.44), and R3 "dealing with people" had the greatest BEI of the interpersonal relationship community (0.19).
Conclusion: This study used network analysis to investigate the relationship between stress and interpersonal relationships in Chinese medical students at the component level for the first time and highlight that the critical bridge variables "personal hassle" and "dealing with people" may contribute to preventing and relieving stress in Chinese medical students.

Keywords

References

  1. Psychol Med. 2019 Oct;49(14):2389-2396 [PMID: 30430959]
  2. Indian J Med Ethics. 2023 Jul-Sep;VIII(3):184-195 [PMID: 36420606]
  3. Biostatistics. 2008 Jul;9(3):432-41 [PMID: 18079126]
  4. J Gen Psychol. 2021 Jul;148(3):249-271 [PMID: 33355034]
  5. J Public Health (Oxf). 2021 Apr 12;43(1):67-75 [PMID: 33094815]
  6. Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 06;13:993555 [PMID: 36276311]
  7. Multivariate Behav Res. 2018 Jan-Feb;53(1):57-73 [PMID: 29220584]
  8. Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 19;10:1014548 [PMID: 36339154]
  9. Multivariate Behav Res. 2021 Mar-Apr;56(2):353-367 [PMID: 31179765]
  10. J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e1901-e1905 [PMID: 32195780]
  11. J Affect Disord. 2023 Feb 1;322:39-45 [PMID: 36375541]
  12. Community Ment Health J. 2020 May;56(4):635-644 [PMID: 31919657]
  13. Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 18;11:563023 [PMID: 33041927]
  14. J Fam Psychol. 2012 Oct;26(5):719-28 [PMID: 22906123]
  15. J Affect Disord. 2023 Jan 15;321:167-181 [PMID: 36341802]
  16. Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 28;10:958884 [PMID: 36249213]
  17. Front Psychol. 2019 May 09;10:1050 [PMID: 31143150]
  18. Psychol Methods. 2018 Dec;23(4):617-634 [PMID: 29595293]
  19. Multivariate Behav Res. 2018 Jul-Aug;53(4):453-480 [PMID: 29658809]
  20. Sleep Sci. 2022 Oct-Dec;15(4):436-440 [PMID: 36419809]
  21. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;12(6):999-1020 [PMID: 28873325]
  22. Patient Educ Couns. 2010 May;79(2):199-206 [PMID: 19748201]
  23. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2022 Nov 18;12(11):1682-1699 [PMID: 36421324]
  24. Int J Med Educ. 2019 May 03;10:90-97 [PMID: 31055522]
  25. PLoS One. 2021 Mar 17;16(3):e0248627 [PMID: 33730091]
  26. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96 [PMID: 6668417]
  27. Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Mar 24;35:87 [PMID: 32537090]
  28. PLoS One. 2022 Nov 22;17(11):e0267530 [PMID: 36413548]
  29. Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 13;13:815369 [PMID: 35496182]
  30. Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 04;12:768341 [PMID: 35058817]
  31. Behav Res Methods. 2018 Feb;50(1):195-212 [PMID: 28342071]
  32. Acad Med. 2006 Apr;81(4):374-84 [PMID: 16565189]
  33. Can Med Educ J. 2022 Sep 01;13(5):116-117 [PMID: 36310900]
  34. J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Feb 27;10:55 [PMID: 34084802]
  35. Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Apr;99:104793 [PMID: 33607512]
  36. Seizure. 2020 Aug;80:138-142 [PMID: 32570170]
  37. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 25;19(21): [PMID: 36360739]
  38. BMC Med Educ. 2017 Feb 21;17(1):42 [PMID: 28222725]
  39. Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 26;13:997910 [PMID: 36225711]
  40. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 11;19(22): [PMID: 36429554]
  41. Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 28;14:1229451 [PMID: 37575453]
  42. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2019 Jul;105:172-177 [PMID: 30292650]
  43. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2019 Jul-Aug;48(4):656-668 [PMID: 29533089]
  44. BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 10;10(12):e043728 [PMID: 33303472]
  45. Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 03;13:978510 [PMID: 36405123]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0medicalstudentsstressinterpersonalhealthrelationshipsnetworkChinesebridgehassle"analysisBEIcommunity"personal"dealingpeople"relationshipservicespublicimportantlevelsstudyinvestigatestructurevariablesStressStudentsInterpersonalNetworkusedexperiencededgesS1R3greatest0Background:growingdemandworldwideespeciallyemergenciesspecialgroupfutureworkersdevelopmentthereforeexperienceordinarycollegementalplaysvitalroletrainingfactoraffectingPurpose:aimsamongidentifypreventrelievePatientsMethods:self-reportmeasurementtakenSociodemographicQuestionnaireScaleCollegeRelationshipSyntheticDiagnosisTestadministered322JanuaryApril2022determineexpectedinfluenceidentifiedvariableResults:total683%high3106%variousdegreesdistressacrossassociatedpositiveS2"academicR2"socializing"S3"negativelifeevent"R4"datingsomeoneoppositesex"strongest4419Conclusion:componentlevelfirsttimehighlightcriticalmaycontributepreventingrelievingRelationshipsMedicalPublicHealthEmergencies:Analysisemergency

Similar Articles

Cited By