Pembrolizumab hybrid dosing is non-inferior to flat dosing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world, retrospective bicenter cohort study.

Michiel M Smeenk, Vincent van der Noort, Jeroen M A Hendrikx, Hanieh Abedian Kalkhoran, Egbert F Smit, Willemijn S M E Theelen
Author Information
  1. Michiel M Smeenk: Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ORCID
  2. Vincent van der Noort: Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  3. Jeroen M A Hendrikx: Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  4. Hanieh Abedian Kalkhoran: Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  5. Egbert F Smit: Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  6. Willemijn S M E Theelen: Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands w.theelen@nki.nl.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment but come with high costs. Alternative ICI dosing strategies could reduce costs without losing efficacy. However, clinical efficacy data are lacking.
METHODS: In this retrospective cohort trial, consecutive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received ≥1 cycle pembrolizumab±chemotherapy at two tertiary institutions were included. Hybrid dosed patients received either 100, 150 or 200 mg pembrolizumab every 3 weeks or double every 6 weeks depending on their weight: <65 kg, 65-90 kg or >90 kg, respectively. Standard-of-care flat dosed patients received 200 mg every 3 weeks or 400 mg every 6 weeks. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimation, compared by log-rank test and HRs were calculated with the Cox proportional hazards model in both unweighted and inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) cohorts. Non-inferiority margin was set at an HR of 1.15.
RESULTS: In total, 375 patients and 391 patients were included and median follow-up was 43.1 and 61.0 months in the hybrid and flat dose cohort, respectively. OS was non-inferior in the hybrid dose cohort compared with the flat dose cohort: median 17.7 months (95% CI 14.9 to 20.9) vs 11.8 months (95% CI 9.3 to 13.8, HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.90, p<0.0001 for non-inferiority). After correcting for confounders by IPTW, OS remained non-inferior (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.91, p<0.0001 for non-inferiority). PFS in the hybrid cohort was also non-inferior to the flat dose cohort with a median of 6.4 months (95% CI 5.7 to 7.7) vs 4.6 months (95% CI 3.9 to 5.5, HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.96, p<0.0001 for non-inferiority). In total, 26.2% (or 52.5 mg per cycle, p<0.0001) pembrolizumab was saved in the hybrid dose cohort accounting to US$36 331.36 per patient.
CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis of a large cohort of advanced NSCLC patients treated with pembrolizumab±chemotherapy, OS of hybrid dosed patients was non-inferior to flat dosed patients. OS remained non-inferior after correcting for possible confounding factors. This hybrid regimen resulted in significant savings of pembrolizumab and costs.

Keywords

References

  1. Lancet Oncol. 2023 May;24(5):e219-e227 [PMID: 37142383]
  2. N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 22;379(21):2040-2051 [PMID: 30280635]
  3. Lancet. 2021 Oct 9;398(10308):1344-1357 [PMID: 34555333]
  4. BMC Cancer. 2020 Dec 3;20(1):1185 [PMID: 33272262]
  5. J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 20;30(15):1750-4 [PMID: 22393092]
  6. Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Oct 1;21(19):4286-93 [PMID: 25977344]
  7. ESMO Open. 2018 Jul 25;3(5):e000332 [PMID: 30094065]
  8. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Dec;17(12):1672-1682 [PMID: 27789196]
  9. Front Pharmacol. 2023 Nov 28;14:1274532 [PMID: 38089058]
  10. Nat Med. 2022 Nov;28(11):2236-2237 [PMID: 36202999]
  11. J Thorac Oncol. 2018 Dec;13(12):1842-1850 [PMID: 30312680]
  12. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Feb;22(2):198-211 [PMID: 33476593]
  13. Lancet. 2016 Apr 9;387(10027):1540-1550 [PMID: 26712084]
  14. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2024 Dec;30(8):1352-1357 [PMID: 37990556]
  15. Int J Cancer. 2021 Jul 1;149(1):169-176 [PMID: 33634869]
  16. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 15;19(10): [PMID: 35627534]
  17. Hemasphere. 2020 Sep 23;4(5):e480 [PMID: 33062947]
  18. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2017 Jan;6(1):29-39 [PMID: 27896938]
  19. BMJ. 2007 Oct 20;335(7624):806-8 [PMID: 17947786]
  20. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2024 May;22(4):249-274 [PMID: 38754467]
  21. JAMA. 2019 Feb 12;321(6):602-603 [PMID: 30676631]
  22. Front Oncol. 2022 Jun 20;12:906251 [PMID: 35795044]
  23. N Engl J Med. 2015 May 21;372(21):2018-28 [PMID: 25891174]
  24. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Dec;23(12):e552-e561 [PMID: 36455584]
  25. Oncologist. 2017 Oct;22(10):1212-1221 [PMID: 28754722]
  26. N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 13;379(24):2342-2350 [PMID: 30280658]
  27. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jul;110(1):200-209 [PMID: 33462831]
  28. Int J Clin Pharm. 2021 Feb;43(1):181-190 [PMID: 32909221]
  29. J Immunother Cancer. 2017 May 16;5:43 [PMID: 28515943]
  30. N Engl J Med. 2023 Aug 10;389(6):491-503 [PMID: 37272513]
  31. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 28;14(3): [PMID: 35158952]
  32. Lancet. 2024 Jan 13;403(10422):171-182 [PMID: 38104577]
  33. N Engl J Med. 2018 May 31;378(22):2078-2092 [PMID: 29658856]
  34. AAPS J. 2021 Mar 7;23(2):39 [PMID: 33677681]
  35. Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Jan;124:107030 [PMID: 36519749]
  36. N Engl J Med. 2022 May 26;386(21):1973-1985 [PMID: 35403841]
  37. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 24;14(5): [PMID: 35267465]
  38. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 10;41(2):222-232 [PMID: 36265101]
  39. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2017 Jan;6(1):21-28 [PMID: 27863143]

MeSH Term

Humans
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
Retrospective Studies
Lung Neoplasms
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
Male
Female
Aged
Middle Aged
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
Aged, 80 and over
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Chemicals

pembrolizumab
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.00cohortpatientshybridflatnon-inferior95% CIOSmonthsdosedosedevery3weeks6HR79p<00001costsdosingretrospectiveadvancedreceivedpembrolizumabmediannon-inferiority5Immunecancertreatmentefficacynon-smallcelllungNSCLCcyclepembrolizumab±chemotherapyincluded200 mgrespectivelysurvivalPFScomparedIPTW1totalvs876correctingremained4per-BACKGROUND:checkpointinhibitorsICIsrevolutionizedcomehighAlternativeICIstrategiesreducewithoutlosingHoweverclinicaldatalackingMETHODS:trialconsecutive≥1twotertiaryinstitutionsHybrideither100150doubledependingweight:<65 kg65-90 kg>90 kgStandard-of-care400 mgOverallprogression-freeassessedKaplan-Meierestimationlog-ranktestHRscalculatedCoxproportionalhazardsmodelunweightedinverseprobabilityweightedcohortsNon-inferioritymarginset15RESULTS:375391follow-up4361cohort:1795%CI142011136590confounders6391also827096262%525 mgsavedaccountingUS$36 33136patientCONCLUSIONS:analysislargetreatedpossibleconfoundingfactorsregimenresultedsignificantsavingsPembrolizumabcancer:real-worldbicenterstudyCheckpointInhibitorImmunotherapyLungCancerPharmacodynamicsPDPharmacokineticsPK

Similar Articles

Cited By