Effectiveness of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Short-Term, In-Hospital Mortality Among Frail and Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Jiawei Shang, Ziming Yuan, Zuoyan Zhang, Quanhong Zhou, Yan Zou, Wei Wang
Author Information
  1. Jiawei Shang: Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. ORCID
  2. Ziming Yuan: Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. ORCID
  3. Zuoyan Zhang: Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. ORCID
  4. Quanhong Zhou: Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. ORCID
  5. Yan Zou: Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. ORCID
  6. Wei Wang: Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in the hospital setting is growing, with more patients using these devices at home, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. frail and Critically Ill patients with COVID-19 and previously normal glucose tolerance are also associated with variability in their glucose levels during their intensive care unit (ICU) stay. However, very limited evidence supports the use of CGM in ICU settings, especially among frail patients with COVID-19.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of CGM on ICU-related outcomes among frail and Critically Ill patients with confirmed COVID-19.
METHODS: This was an exploratory, prospective, open-label, parallel, single-center, randomized controlled trial. A total of 124 patients was finally analyzed. The primary outcome was 28-day, in-ICU mortality. The secondary outcome included the length of ICU stay as well as the occurrence of hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia events.
RESULTS: The mean age was 78.3 (SD 11.5) years. The mean fasting glucose level and hemoglobin A level at baseline were 8.12 (SD 1.54) mmol/L and 7.2% (SD 0.8%), respectively. The percentage of participants with diabetes was 30.6% (38/124). The corresponding hazard ratio of the primary outcome in the intermittently scanned CGM (isCGM) group when compared with the point-of-care testing (POCT) group was 0.18 (95% CI 0.04-0.79). The average length of ICU stay was 10.0 (SD 7.57) days in the isCGM group and 14.0 (SD 6.86) days in the POCT group (P=.02). At the end of study period, the mean value of fasting glucose in the isCGM group and the POCT group was 6.07 (SD 0.63) mmol/L and 7.76 (SD 0.62) mmol/L, respectively (P=.01). A total of 207 hypoglycemia events (<3.9 mmol/L) was detected, with 43 in the isCGM group and 164 in the POCT group (P<.001). A total of 81 severe hypoglycemia events (<2.8 mmol/L) was detected, with 16 in the isCGM group and 65 in the POCT group (P<.001). The major adverse event in this study was bleeding in the puncture site, with a total of 6 occurrences in the isCGM group. During the follow-up, none of the participants dropped out because of bleeding in the puncture site.
CONCLUSIONS: We found a significant clinical benefit from the use of CGM among frail and Critically Ill patients with COVID-19. These findings support the use of CGM in the ICU and might help with the extension of application in various in-hospital settings.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200059733; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=169257.

Keywords

References

  1. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2019 Sep;35(6):e3152 [PMID: 30884108]
  2. Diabetes Care. 2021 Mar;44(3):847-849 [PMID: 33361145]
  3. Nat Med. 2024 May;30(5):1424-1431 [PMID: 38589602]
  4. Diabetes Care. 2023 Apr 1;46(4):864-867 [PMID: 36809308]
  5. Diabetes Care. 2024 Dec 1;47(12):2062-2075 [PMID: 39452893]
  6. Diabetes Care. 2021 Apr;44(4):976-982 [PMID: 33574126]
  7. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2023 Apr;198:110603 [PMID: 36871877]
  8. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 May;17(3):656-666 [PMID: 37056168]
  9. Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(1):89-96 [PMID: 37782847]
  10. Glob Health Med. 2022 Aug 31;4(4):210-215 [PMID: 36119784]
  11. Diabetes Care. 2017 Dec;40(12):1631-1640 [PMID: 29162583]
  12. Diabetes Care. 2020 Nov;43(11):2873-2877 [PMID: 32855160]
  13. Diabetes Care. 2021 Mar;44(3):e50-e52 [PMID: 33479159]
  14. Endocrine. 2022 Dec;78(3):470-475 [PMID: 36227509]
  15. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023 Jan;11(1):42-57 [PMID: 36493795]
  16. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Sep;16(5):1136-1143 [PMID: 33971753]
  17. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020 Jul;14(4):705-707 [PMID: 32370606]
  18. Diabetes Care. 2020 Nov;43(11):2736-2743 [PMID: 32759361]
  19. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020 Jul;14(4):822-832 [PMID: 32536205]
  20. Endocr Connect. 2023 Sep 25;12(10): [PMID: 37578799]

MeSH Term

Humans
COVID-19
Aged
Critical Illness
Male
Female
Blood Glucose
Hospital Mortality
Aged, 80 and over
Prospective Studies
Intensive Care Units
Hypoglycemia
Frail Elderly
Middle Aged
SARS-CoV-2
Monitoring, Physiologic
Length of Stay
Pandemics
Continuous Glucose Monitoring

Chemicals

Blood Glucose

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0groupglucoseCGMSD0isCGMpatientsCOVID-19ICUPOCTmortalitymmol/Lusemonitoringcriticallyillfrailtotalhypoglycemiacontinuouscarestayamongoutcomeeventsmean76especiallyFrailintensiveunitsettingsexploratoryprospectiveparallelrandomizedtrialprimaryin-ICUlengthseverefastinglevel8respectivelyparticipantsintermittentlyscannedtestingdaysP=studydetectedP<001bleedingpuncturesiteclinicalin-hospitalTrialBACKGROUND:hospitalsettinggrowingusingdeviceshomepandemicpreviouslynormaltolerancealsoassociatedvariabilitylevelsHoweverlimitedevidencesupportsOBJECTIVE:aimedinvestigateeffectivenessICU-relatedoutcomesconfirmedMETHODS:open-labelsingle-centercontrolled124finallyanalyzed28-daysecondaryincludedwelloccurrenceRESULTS:age783115yearshemoglobinbaseline121542%8%percentagediabetes306%38/124correspondinghazardratiocomparedpoint-of-care1895%CI04-079average1057148602endperiodvalue0763766201207<394316481<21665majoradverseeventoccurrencesfollow-upnonedroppedCONCLUSIONS:foundsignificantbenefitfindingssupportmighthelpextensionapplicationvariousTRIALREGISTRATION:ChineseClinicalRegistryChiCTR2200059733https://wwwchictrorgcn/showprojhtml?proj=169257EffectivenessContinuousGlucoseMonitoringShort-TermIn-HospitalMortalityAmongCriticallyIllPatientsCOVID-19:RandomizedControlledSARS-CoV-2inpatientopenlabelpointsinglecenter

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.