Cognitive Rehabilitation of Brain Tumor Survivors: A Systematic Review.

Rabeet Tariq, Hafiza Fatima Aziz, Shahier Paracha, Nida Zahid, Timothy J Ainger, Farhan A Mirza, Syed Ather Enam
Author Information
  1. Rabeet Tariq: Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. ORCID
  2. Hafiza Fatima Aziz: Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
  3. Shahier Paracha: Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
  4. Nida Zahid: Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
  5. Timothy J Ainger: Department of Neurology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Kentucky Neuroscience Institute, Lexington, KY, USA.
  6. Farhan A Mirza: Kentucky Neuroscience Institute (KNI), Department of Neurosurgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
  7. Syed Ather Enam: Center of Oncological Research in Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. ather.enam@aku.edu. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cognitive decline is commonly seen in brain tumor (BT) patients and is associated with a worsened prognosis. Cognitive rehabilitation (CR) for cancer-related cognitive dysfunction has been widely studied for non-central nervous system cancers; however, recent emerging research has commenced documenting CR strategies for BT patients and survivors. Our objective was to review the current literature on various CR modalities in patients and BT survivors.
METHODS: The review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The studies on CR were searched across 3 databases using a predefined search strategy. After removing duplicates, performing initial and full-text screenings, and applying inclusion criteria, relevant articles were selected. The demographic details, CR technique, cognitive tasks/tests administered, cognitive functions assessed, follow-up time, and outcomes of the intervention were assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 15 studies were included in the review. Neuropsychologist-guided training sessions to improve memory, attention, and executive functioning are effective in improving the mentioned domains. Younger and more educated patients benefited the most. Holistic mnemonic training and neurofeedback were not shown to affect overall cognitive functioning. Computer-based training programs showed improvements in executive functions of pediatric BT survivors, however, feasibility studies showed conflicting results. Aerobic exercises improved executive functions and decreased symptoms of the tumor. Both yoga and combined aerobic and strength training improved overall cognitive functioning. Active video gaming may improve motor and process skills; however, no effect was seen on cognitive functioning.
CONCLUSION: Neuropsychologic training, computer-based programs, and physical exercise have been found effective in improving or preventing decline in cognitive functions of BT patients. Given the limited trials and methodological variations, a standardized CR program cannot be established at present. Ongoing trials are expected to provide valuable data in the near future.

Keywords

References

  1. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Sep;8(9):810-8 [PMID: 19665931]
  2. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2019 Jun;23(Suppl 2):S162-S164 [PMID: 31485127]
  3. Neurooncol Pract. 2017 Jun;4(2):98-110 [PMID: 31385977]
  4. Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 09;11:648 [PMID: 32373018]
  5. Neurooncol Pract. 2017 Jun;4(2):111-120 [PMID: 31385985]
  6. Neuro Oncol. 2013 Oct;15(10):1429-37 [PMID: 23956241]
  7. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Feb;28(2):226-35 [PMID: 17296985]
  8. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug 1;27(22):3712-22 [PMID: 19470928]
  9. Qual Life Res. 2023 Mar;32(3):625-651 [PMID: 35931881]
  10. Neurol Clin. 2018 Aug;36(3):533-556 [PMID: 30072070]
  11. J Neurooncol. 2013 Aug;114(1):93-100 [PMID: 23677749]
  12. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2011 Mar;17(2):256-66 [PMID: 21205412]
  13. Phys Ther. 2020 Mar 10;100(3):564-574 [PMID: 32043148]
  14. Eur J Cancer. 2016 Sep;64:62-73 [PMID: 27343714]
  15. J Cancer Res Ther. 2022 Dec;18(7):2058-2065 [PMID: 36647970]
  16. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 11;14(16): [PMID: 36010873]
  17. JAMA. 2016 Jul 26;316(4):401-409 [PMID: 27458945]
  18. Support Care Cancer. 2019 Sep;27(9):3253-3279 [PMID: 31147780]
  19. Eur J Endocrinol. 2022 May 02;186(6):667-675 [PMID: 35380988]
  20. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jun 1;39(16):1718-1726 [PMID: 33886348]
  21. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Mar 15;55(4):992-9 [PMID: 12605978]
  22. J Neurooncol. 2018 May;137(3):523-532 [PMID: 29322428]
  23. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2022 Apr;30:1-9 [PMID: 35500954]
  24. Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2021 Oct-Dec;10(4):340-347 [PMID: 31887256]
  25. J Pediatr Psychol. 2019 Jul 1;44(6):669-678 [PMID: 30874803]
  26. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021 Aug;68(8):e29130 [PMID: 34047487]
  27. J Neurol. 2021 Dec;268(12):4908-4914 [PMID: 34028615]
  28. Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Jul;131(7):1533-1547 [PMID: 32403066]
  29. J Neurooncol. 1996 Oct;30(1):61-9 [PMID: 8865004]
  30. J Support Oncol. 2008 Nov-Dec;6(8):383-91 [PMID: 19149323]
  31. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2010 Mar;14(2):106-15 [PMID: 19931477]
  32. Neurosurgery. 2000 Aug;47(2):324-33; discussion 333-4 [PMID: 10942005]
  33. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 10;2019(11): [PMID: 31706263]
  34. Acta Neurol Scand. 2022 Jan;145(1):94-101 [PMID: 34514585]
  35. J Neurol. 2021 Apr;268(4):1434-1442 [PMID: 33211158]
  36. Neurol Sci. 2023 Jun;44(6):1917-1929 [PMID: 36773209]
  37. J Neurooncol. 2019 Jan;141(1):235-244 [PMID: 30406339]
  38. J Neurooncol. 2012 Mar;107(1):165-74 [PMID: 21964738]
  39. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Aug;41:104-109 [PMID: 31358242]
  40. Neuro Oncol. 2022 Oct 5;24(Suppl 5):v1-v95 [PMID: 36196752]
  41. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2019 Apr 8;20(5):42 [PMID: 30963289]
  42. Neuro Oncol. 2020 Jan 11;22(1):103-115 [PMID: 31755917]
  43. Front Oncol. 2015 Apr 08;5:85 [PMID: 25905043]
  44. Cancer. 2003 May 15;97(10):2512-9 [PMID: 12733151]
  45. Arch Neurol. 1990 Apr;47(4):397-405 [PMID: 2322133]
  46. Neuro Oncol. 2013 Oct;15(10):1420-8 [PMID: 23925452]
  47. J Neurooncol. 2010 Mar;97(1):109-15 [PMID: 19763790]
  48. J Neurooncol. 2021 Sep;154(3):315-326 [PMID: 34487313]
  49. Lancet Neurol. 2004 Mar;3(3):159-68 [PMID: 14980531]
  50. J Neurooncol. 2019 May;142(3):565-575 [PMID: 30847839]
  51. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2021 Dec;15(6):1659-1666 [PMID: 33369162]
  52. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Aug;100(8):1515-1533 [PMID: 30926291]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0cognitiveCRCognitiveBTpatientsfunctionstrainingfunctioninghoweversurvivorsreviewstudiesexecutivedeclineseentumorrehabilitationassessedimproveeffectiveimprovingoverallprogramsshowedimprovedtrialsBrainBACKGROUND:commonlybrainassociatedworsenedprognosiscancer-relateddysfunctionwidelystudiednon-centralnervoussystemcancersrecentemergingresearchcommenceddocumentingstrategiesobjectivecurrentliteraturevariousmodalitiesMETHODS:conductedaccordancePRISMAguidelinessearchedacross3databasesusingpredefinedsearchstrategyremovingduplicatesperforminginitialfull-textscreeningsapplyinginclusioncriteriarelevantarticlesselecteddemographicdetailstechniquetasks/testsadministeredfollow-uptimeoutcomesinterventionRESULTS:total15includedNeuropsychologist-guidedsessionsmemoryattentionmentioneddomainsYoungereducatedbenefitedHolisticmnemonicneurofeedbackshownaffectComputer-basedimprovementspediatricfeasibilityconflictingresultsAerobicexercisesdecreasedsymptomsyogacombinedaerobicstrengthActivevideogamingmaymotorprocessskillseffectCONCLUSION:Neuropsychologiccomputer-basedphysicalexercisefoundpreventingGivenlimitedmethodologicalvariationsstandardizedprogramestablishedpresentOngoingexpectedprovidevaluabledatanearfutureRehabilitationTumorSurvivors:SystematicReviewtumors

Similar Articles

Cited By