Can the Use of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Content Bridge the Cancer Knowledge Gap? A Longitudinal Study With Health Self-Efficacy as a Mediator and Educational Level as a Moderator.

Zehang Xie, Ru Chen, Wenjuan Ding
Author Information
  1. Zehang Xie: School of Media and Communication, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China. ORCID
  2. Ru Chen: College of Humanities and New Media, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China.
  3. Wenjuan Ding: School of Culture and Media, Zhengzhou College of Finance and Economics, Zhengzhou, China.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The cancer knowledge gap represents a significant disparity in awareness and understanding of cancer-related information across different demographic groups. Leveraging Artificial Intelligence-Generated Content (AIGC) offers a promising approach to personalize health education and potentially bridge this gap. This study aimed to evaluate the potential of AIGC to bridge the cancer knowledge gap, assessing the roles of health self-efficacy as a mediator and educational level as a moderator in this relationship.
METHODS: A 6-month longitudinal study was conducted using online surveys distributed to undergraduate students in non-medical disciplines at one university and graduate students in medical specialties at another university in China. The study assessed the frequency of AIGC use, health self-efficacy, and cancer knowledge at two time points.
RESULTS: The results indicated that AIGC use significantly enhanced cancer knowledge levels and health self-efficacy over time. Educational level notably moderated the effects of AIGC use, with non-medical undergraduate students showing greater gains in knowledge and self-efficacy. Additionally, health self-efficacy mediated the relationship between AIGC use and cancer knowledge, underscoring the importance of health self-efficacy. The study confirms the efficacy of AIGC in narrowing the cancer knowledge gap and enhancing health self-efficacy, particularly among students with lower initial medical knowledge.
CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the potential of integrating AIGC tools in cancer education and public health interventions, particularly for individuals at different educational levels. By tailoring digital health resources to varying educational needs, these interventions could enhance cancer knowledge acquisition, improve health self-efficacy, and contribute to better cancer prevention and control outcomes.

Keywords

References

  1. Cancer Control. 2020 Jan-Dec;27(1):1073274820920637 [PMID: 32397745]
  2. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2023 May-Jun 01;29(3):369-376 [PMID: 36867507]
  3. Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 30;9:755808 [PMID: 34917575]
  4. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 29;11(17): [PMID: 37685452]
  5. J Cancer Educ. 2018 Dec;33(6):1270-1278 [PMID: 28668992]
  6. Int J Eat Disord. 2022 Sep;55(9):1229-1244 [PMID: 36056648]
  7. Commun Med. 2023 Apr 12;18(2):199-217 [PMID: 39916083]
  8. Psychol Health. 2023 Apr;38(4):478-493 [PMID: 34486898]
  9. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Jul 14;14:3003-3011 [PMID: 34285614]
  10. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 2;21(1):191 [PMID: 33653315]
  11. J Cancer Educ. 2021 Jun;36(3):603-610 [PMID: 31848938]
  12. Prev Med. 2019 May;122:148-154 [PMID: 31078168]
  13. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Feb 26;17:765-782 [PMID: 38434960]
  14. Am J Health Behav. 2007 Sep-Oct;31 Suppl 1:S27-35 [PMID: 17931133]
  15. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 Jan;31(1):5-10 [PMID: 34728469]
  16. Health Psychol. 2017 Mar;36(3):192-205 [PMID: 27929332]
  17. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 16;147(8):573-7 [PMID: 17938396]
  18. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Apr 13;29(5):1000-1010 [PMID: 35137107]
  19. Digit Health. 2023 Aug 29;9:20552076231197334 [PMID: 37654708]
  20. Public Underst Sci. 2020 Nov;29(8):835-854 [PMID: 32873159]
  21. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Mar 21;12:111 [PMID: 29662446]
  22. Health Commun. 2008 Sep;23(5):448-61 [PMID: 18850392]
  23. Cancer Control. 2019 Jan-Dec;26(1):1073274819846603 [PMID: 31131620]
  24. Br J Health Psychol. 2018 May;23(2):420-435 [PMID: 29388364]
  25. J Genet Couns. 2017 Dec;26(6):1179-1196 [PMID: 28667568]
  26. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2024 Apr 01;36(4):202-209 [PMID: 37732894]
  27. BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Mar 29;22(1):30 [PMID: 36991463]
  28. Prev Sci. 2007 Sep;8(3):206-13 [PMID: 17549635]
  29. Digit Health. 2023 Nov 3;9:20552076231211634 [PMID: 37928336]
  30. J Health Commun. 2006;11 Suppl 1:1-17 [PMID: 16641071]
  31. Rev Med Chil. 2019 Jul;147(7):914-921 [PMID: 31859990]
  32. Health Promot Int. 2023 Oct 1;38(5): [PMID: 37837409]
  33. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2021 Dec;18(sup1):37-49 [PMID: 34872429]
  34. Psychooncology. 2019 Sep;28(9):1781-1790 [PMID: 31206917]

MeSH Term

Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Self Efficacy
Female
Male
Neoplasms
Artificial Intelligence
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Adult
Young Adult
Surveys and Questionnaires
Health Education
Educational Status
China

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthcancerknowledgeAIGCself-efficacygapstudyeducationalstudentsuseleveldifferentArtificialIntelligence-GeneratedContenteducationbridgepotentialrelationshiplongitudinalundergraduatenon-medicaluniversitymedicaltimelevelsEducationalparticularlyinterventionsOBJECTIVES:representssignificantdisparityawarenessunderstandingcancer-relatedinformationacrossdemographicgroupsLeveragingofferspromisingapproachpersonalizepotentiallyaimedevaluateassessingrolesmediatormoderatorMETHODS:6-monthconductedusingonlinesurveysdistributeddisciplinesonegraduatespecialtiesanotherChinaassessedfrequencytwopointsRESULTS:resultsindicatedsignificantlyenhancednotablymoderatedeffectsshowinggreatergainsAdditionallymediatedunderscoringimportanceconfirmsefficacynarrowingenhancingamonglowerinitialCONCLUSION:findingshighlightintegratingtoolspublicindividualstailoringdigitalresourcesvaryingneedsenhanceacquisitionimprovecontributebetterpreventioncontroloutcomesCanUseBridgeCancerKnowledgeGap?LongitudinalStudyHealthSelf-EfficacyMediatorLevelModerator

Similar Articles

Cited By