Model sensitivity limits attribution of greenhouse gas emissions to polar bear demographic rates.

Ryan R Wilson, Erik M Andersen
Author Information
  1. Ryan R Wilson: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Marine Mammals Management, Anchorage, AK, USA. ryan_r_wilson@fws.gov.
  2. Erik M Andersen: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Marine Mammals Management, Anchorage, AK, USA.

Abstract

Greenhouse gas emissions continue to increase and negatively affect sea ice conditions that polar bears rely on. It is therefore important to better understand how specific emissions levels affect polar bear demography. A recent study proposed a framework to address this issue, but sensitivity to decisions rules of the approach may limit its utility. We tested how sensitive the approach is to decisions rules related to sea ice concentration, choice of subpopulation boundaries, and modeling choices for bears in the Chukchi Sea and Southern Beaufort Sea subpopulations. We found that the number of ice-free days, number of fasting days, and when 10% of reproductive females exhibited recruitment failure varied considerably depending on equally-valid decisions rules versus those used in the existing study. Whereas the previous study suggested that both subpopulations surpassed the critical number of ice-free days that negatively affect recruitment, we found this threshold was never reached by the Southern Beaufort Sea subpopulation and only once for the Chukchi Sea subpopulation for the decision rules we considered. Our results suggest that the previously published approach is too sensitive to modeling assumptions and choice of decision rules to accurately evaluate the impacts of GHG emissions on polar bear demographic rates.

Keywords

References

  1. J Anim Ecol. 2013 May;82(3):551-61 [PMID: 23398634]
  2. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Mar 16;375(1794):20190104 [PMID: 31983329]
  3. Oecologia. 2017 May;184(1):87-99 [PMID: 28247129]
  4. Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 14;8(1):16780 [PMID: 30429493]
  5. Ecol Evol. 2021 Sep 23;11(20):14250-14267 [PMID: 34707852]
  6. Ecol Appl. 2015 Apr;25(3):634-51 [PMID: 26214910]
  7. Ecol Appl. 2023 Mar;33(2):e2751 [PMID: 36151883]
  8. J Anim Ecol. 2013 Jul;82(4):912-21 [PMID: 23510081]
  9. Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Jan;24(1):410-423 [PMID: 28994242]
  10. Ecol Appl. 2021 Dec;31(8):e02461 [PMID: 34582601]
  11. Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Jan;20(1):76-88 [PMID: 23913506]
  12. Biometrics. 2019 Sep;75(3):810-820 [PMID: 30859552]
  13. PLoS One. 2015 Nov 18;10(11):e0142213 [PMID: 26580809]
  14. Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Jun;27(12):2684-2701 [PMID: 33644944]
  15. Science. 2023 Sep;381(6661):949-951 [PMID: 37651530]
  16. Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Jul;19(7):2036-57 [PMID: 23505016]
  17. PLoS One. 2016 Jun 01;11(6):e0155932 [PMID: 27249673]
  18. Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Aug 17;283(1836): [PMID: 27534959]
  19. PLoS One. 2014 Nov 26;9(11):e113746 [PMID: 25426720]
  20. Nat Commun. 2024 Feb 13;15(1):947 [PMID: 38351211]
  21. Ecol Appl. 2010 Apr;20(3):768-82 [PMID: 20437962]
  22. Ecol Appl. 2016 Jul;26(5):1302-1320 [PMID: 27755745]

MeSH Term

Animals
Greenhouse Gases
Ursidae
Female
Ice Cover
Population Dynamics
Models, Theoretical

Chemicals

Greenhouse Gases

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0emissionsrulespolarSeagasaffectbearsbearstudydecisionsapproachsubpopulationnumberdaysGreenhousenegativelyseaicesensitivitysensitivechoicemodelingChukchiSouthernBeaufortsubpopulationsfoundice-freerecruitmentdecisiondemographicratesattributionClimatecontinueincreaseconditionsrelythereforeimportantbetterunderstandspecificlevelsdemographyrecentproposedframeworkaddressissuemaylimitutilitytestedrelatedconcentrationboundarieschoicesfasting10%reproductivefemalesexhibitedfailurevariedconsiderablydependingequally-validversususedexistingWhereasprevioussuggestedsurpassedcriticalthresholdneverreachedconsideredresultssuggestpreviouslypublishedassumptionsaccuratelyevaluateimpactsGHGModellimitsgreenhouseUrsusmaritimuschangeEndangeredspeciesactPolar

Similar Articles

Cited By