Dental discrepancies in black adolescents: evaluating impacts on well-being.

Jean Érick Langoski, Ana Claudia Lima de Oliveira Meira, Milton Santamaria-Junior, Carolina Carmo de Menezes, Marcelo de Castro Meneghim, Silvia Amélia Scudeler Vedovello
Author Information
  1. Jean Érick Langoski: Centro Universitário da Fundação Hermínio Ometto, Araras Dental School, Department of Orthodontics, Araras, SP, Brazil. ORCID
  2. Ana Claudia Lima de Oliveira Meira: Centro Universitário da Fundação Hermínio Ometto, Araras Dental School, Department of Orthodontics, Araras, SP, Brazil. ORCID
  3. Milton Santamaria-Junior: Centro Universitário da Fundação Hermínio Ometto, Araras Dental School, Department of Orthodontics, Araras, SP, Brazil. ORCID
  4. Carolina Carmo de Menezes: Universidade Estadual Paulista - Unesp, School of Dentistry of Araraquara, Department of Orthodontics, Araraquara, SP, Brazil. ORCID
  5. Marcelo de Castro Meneghim: Universidade Estadual de Campinas - Unicamp, Piracicaba Dental School, Department of Health Sciences and Child Dentistry, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil. ORCID
  6. Silvia Amélia Scudeler Vedovello: Universidade Estadual de Campinas - Unicamp, Piracicaba Dental School,Department of Orthdontics, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil. ORCID

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the esthetic, functional, and psychosocial impact of mandibular crowding and maxillary midline diastema in black adolescents. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 420 black (brown and black, distinguished according to Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics - IBGE) adolescents aged 12 with normal occlusal relationships. Esthetic (OASIS) and functional/psychosocial (OHIP-14) impact related to the need for orthodontic treatment in groups with mandibular crowding and maxillary midline diastema, and those without these conditions: G1, without crowding and diastema (n 113); G2, without crowding and with diastema (n 67); G3, with crowding and without diastema (n 202); and G4, diastema, and crowding (n 38) were evaluated. Generalized linear models were estimated for the effects of diastema, crowding, and the interaction between them, with a significance level of 5%. There was no significant influence of crowding and diastema on the OHIP-14 (p>0.05). However, the groups with diastema had higher OASIS scores, irrespective of crowding (p<0.05). The maxillary midline diastema influenced the esthetic perception of black adolescents.

References

  1. Eur J Orthod. 2022 Aug 16;44(4):377-384 [PMID: 34568892]
  2. Cien Saude Colet. 2018 Mar;23(3):723-732 [PMID: 29538553]
  3. West Afr J Med. 2010 Nov-Dec;29(6):417-24 [PMID: 21465452]
  4. J Public Health Dent. 1989 Summer;49(3):163-6 [PMID: 2769634]
  5. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32:e95 [PMID: 30231170]
  6. Scientifica (Cairo). 2016;2016:5607594 [PMID: 27239374]
  7. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2020 Jun;21(2):115-122 [PMID: 32567942]
  8. Dental Press J Orthod. 2018 Nov-Dec;23(6):40.e1-40.e10 [PMID: 30672991]
  9. BMC Pediatr. 2022 Feb 14;22(1):91 [PMID: 35164722]
  10. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 May 01;13(5):e440-e445 [PMID: 33981390]
  11. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2015;13(5):417-25 [PMID: 25789358]
  12. Cien Saude Colet. 2018 May;23(5):1561-1576 [PMID: 29768610]
  13. Cad Saude Publica. 2005 Sep-Oct;21(5):1586-94 [PMID: 16158166]
  14. ScientificWorldJournal. 2019 Jun 12;2019:2685437 [PMID: 31281231]
  15. Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 10;10(1):13471 [PMID: 32778676]
  16. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Mar 27;12:461-465 [PMID: 29628758]
  17. Int J Esthet Dent. 2015 Winter;10(4):610-7 [PMID: 26794056]
  18. Cien Saude Colet. 2021 Nov 15;26(suppl 3):5233-5240 [PMID: 34787214]
  19. Int Dent J. 2023 Apr;73(2):167-177 [PMID: 35922369]
  20. Int J Dent. 2020 Oct 14;2020:8870270 [PMID: 33133189]
  21. Eur J Orthod. 2023 May 31;45(3):295-307 [PMID: 36995692]
  22. Dental Press J Orthod. 2021 Dec 15;26(6):e2120147 [PMID: 34932709]
  23. Eur J Orthod. 2015 Jun;37(3):238-47 [PMID: 25214504]
  24. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997 Aug;25(4):284-90 [PMID: 9332805]
  25. Dental Press J Orthod. 2018 Mar-Apr;23(2):30-36 [PMID: 29898155]
  26. J Med Life. 2021 Jan-Mar;14(1):21-31 [PMID: 33767781]
  27. Braz Oral Res. 2015;29:46 [PMID: 25741623]
  28. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022 Mar;161(3):390-395 [PMID: 34688516]
  29. Eur J Orthod. 1989 Aug;11(3):309-20 [PMID: 2792220]
  30. Angle Orthod. 2021 Jan 1;91(1):54-60 [PMID: 33289783]
  31. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022 Nov;162(5):e252-e256 [PMID: 36100479]
  32. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Jan;123(1):35-9 [PMID: 12532061]
  33. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91 [PMID: 17695343]
  34. Eur J Orthod. 2000 Apr;22(2):175-83 [PMID: 10822891]
  35. Angle Orthod. 2005 Jan;75(1):63-8 [PMID: 15747817]

MeSH Term

Humans
Adolescent
Malocclusion
Female
Male
Cross-Sectional Studies
Esthetics, Dental
Black People
Brazil
Child
Diastema
Quality of Life

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0diastemacrowdingblackwithoutnmaxillarymidlineadolescentsstudyestheticimpactmandibularOASISOHIP-14groups05aimcomparefunctionalpsychosocialcross-sectionalconducted420browndistinguishedaccordingBrazilianInstituteGeographyStatistics-IBGEaged12normalocclusalrelationshipsEstheticfunctional/psychosocialrelatedneedorthodontictreatmentconditions:G1113G267G3202G438evaluatedGeneralizedlinearmodelsestimatedeffectsinteractionsignificancelevel5%significantinfluencep>0Howeverhigherscoresirrespectivep<0influencedperceptionDentaldiscrepanciesadolescents:evaluatingimpactswell-being

Similar Articles

Cited By