Investigating the Relationship Between Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Academic Performance in the Adolescent Population: The EHDLA Study.

José Francisco López-Gil, Emily Cisneros-Vásquez, Jorge Olivares-Arancibia, Rodrigo Yañéz-Sepúlveda, Héctor Gutiérrez-Espinoza
Author Information
  1. José Francisco López-Gil: One Health Research Group, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito 170124, Ecuador. ORCID
  2. Emily Cisneros-Vásquez: One Health Research Group, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito 170124, Ecuador. ORCID
  3. Jorge Olivares-Arancibia: AFySE Group, Research in Physical Activity and School Health, School of Physical Education, Faculty of Education, Universidad de las Américas, Santiago 7500000, Chile. ORCID
  4. Rodrigo Yañéz-Sepúlveda: Faculty Education and Social Sciences, Universidad Andres Bello, Viña del Mar 2520000, Chile. ORCID
  5. Héctor Gutiérrez-Espinoza: Faculty of Education, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Santiago 7500912, Chile. ORCID

Abstract

Previous studies have tested the link between diet quality and academic performance in the young population. However, no study has analyzed the specific relationship between ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption and academic performance in adolescents. The aim of the present study was to test the link of UPF consumption with academic performance in a sample of adolescents from Spain. This secondary cross-sectional analysis utilized information from 788 youths aged 12-17 participating in the Eating Healthy and Daily Life Activities study. The sample comprised 44.7% boys and 55.3% girls, with a median age of 14.0 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 13.0 to 15.0). The UPF consumption was measured through a self-completed food frequency survey. Academic performance was determined using end-of-year academic records provided by each educational institution. To examine the relationships between these variables, generalized linear models were employed. The models were adjusted for factors including sex, age, socioeconomic status, conduct, physical activity, sleep duration, body mass index, and sedentary behavior. Significant dose-response associations between UPF consumption and all the different academic performance indicators, showing that higher UPF consumption is consistently associated with poorer academic performance ( < 0.001 for all). Higher daily UPF servings were associated with lower adjusted marginal means for grade point average, language, maths, and English. Furthermore, adolescents in the highest UPF tertile had a grade point average of 5.6 compared to 6.6 in the lowest tertile, with similar patterns being observed for language (6.0 vs. 7.0), maths (5.2 vs. 6.2), and English (5.7 vs. 6.6). Our study identifies a negative association between UPF consumption and academic performance in adolescents, highlighting it as a modifiable factor that could impact academic outcomes. Adolescents with higher UPF consumption exhibited consistently lower grades across various academic indicators, emphasizing the importance of dietary quality during this critical developmental period.

Keywords

References

  1. Am J Clin Nutr. 1995 Jul;62(1 Suppl):212S-221S; discussion 221S-227S [PMID: 7598079]
  2. BMJ. 2019 May 29;365:l2289 [PMID: 31142449]
  3. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jan 29;100(4):e24334 [PMID: 33530225]
  4. J Neurosci. 2020 Sep 9;40(37):7142-7154 [PMID: 32801150]
  5. Sch Psychol. 2019 May;34(3):328-340 [PMID: 30474992]
  6. Int J Public Health. 2024 Oct 08;69:1607658 [PMID: 39439747]
  7. Front Nutr. 2023 Oct 10;10:1272126 [PMID: 37881777]
  8. J Sports Sci. 2021 Apr;39(7):801-807 [PMID: 33213295]
  9. Sleep Med. 2021 Jul;83:71-82 [PMID: 33991893]
  10. Public Health Nutr. 2009 May;12(5):729-31 [PMID: 19366466]
  11. Cell Mol Immunol. 2021 Nov;18(11):2489-2501 [PMID: 34594000]
  12. Clin Nutr. 2021 Jun;40(6):4465-4472 [PMID: 33495088]
  13. BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 09;6(3):e009892 [PMID: 26962035]
  14. Eur J Pediatr. 2024 May;183(5):2003-2014 [PMID: 38416259]
  15. Child Dev Perspect. 2020 Mar;14(1):15-20 [PMID: 35909387]
  16. Nutrients. 2020 Jun 30;12(7): [PMID: 32630022]
  17. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015 Feb 02;9:28 [PMID: 25698933]
  18. Nutrients. 2016 Jan 02;8(1): [PMID: 26729157]
  19. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 13;18(4): [PMID: 33668414]
  20. Nutrients. 2020 Mar 26;12(4): [PMID: 32224933]
  21. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2017 Apr;30(2):117-140 [PMID: 27599886]
  22. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2021 Jan;27(1):36-47 [PMID: 33381913]
  23. Health Educ Behav. 2017 Dec;44(6):918-927 [PMID: 28436241]
  24. Nutr Neurosci. 2019 Apr;22(4):273-283 [PMID: 28944721]
  25. Adv Nutr. 2014 May 14;5(3):337S-43S [PMID: 24829486]
  26. EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Jan 31;56:101840 [PMID: 36880051]
  27. Neuroimage. 2018 Jun;173:298-310 [PMID: 29486324]
  28. Hippocampus. 2015 Feb;25(2):227-39 [PMID: 25242636]
  29. J Nutr. 2012 Oct;142(10):1843-50 [PMID: 22875552]
  30. Nutr Hosp. 2008 May-Jun;23(3):242-52 [PMID: 18560701]
  31. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30(6):718-29 [PMID: 16887188]
  32. Nutrients. 2024 Apr 04;16(7): [PMID: 38613086]
  33. Soc Sci Med. 2008 Mar;66(6):1429-36 [PMID: 18179852]
  34. Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Mar;3(3):e132-42 [PMID: 25701991]
  35. Nutrients. 2024 Nov 01;16(21): [PMID: 39519600]
  36. Physiol Behav. 2018 Aug 1;192:118-126 [PMID: 29501837]
  37. Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2023 Apr;28(2):91-99 [PMID: 37045455]
  38. Children (Basel). 2022 Mar 07;9(3): [PMID: 35327742]
  39. Nutrition. 2023 Feb;106:111908 [PMID: 36470114]
  40. Nutrients. 2020 Nov 05;12(11): [PMID: 33167515]
  41. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 May;99(5):1026-32 [PMID: 24522447]
  42. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Jun;1021:23-6 [PMID: 15251870]
  43. PLoS One. 2015 Oct 30;10(10):e0141895 [PMID: 26517552]
  44. Front Immunol. 2022 Aug 31;13:988481 [PMID: 36119103]
  45. J Sports Sci. 2020 Dec;38(23):2637-2660 [PMID: 32783695]
  46. Public Health. 2019 Feb;167:111-124 [PMID: 30654313]
  47. Nutrients. 2023 Mar 22;15(6): [PMID: 36986276]
  48. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Jun;101:45-67 [PMID: 30951762]
  49. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Feb;9(2):69-74 [PMID: 15668099]
  50. Behav Neurosci. 2011 Dec;125(6):943-55 [PMID: 22023100]
  51. Nutrients. 2019 Nov 05;11(11): [PMID: 31694143]
  52. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Sep;25(1):107-16 [PMID: 15913965]
  53. Psychol Bull. 2021 Nov;147(11):1215-1240 [PMID: 35238586]
  54. Neuroscience. 2002;112(4):803-14 [PMID: 12088740]
  55. Clin Nutr. 2024 Aug;43(8):1702-1709 [PMID: 38896917]

MeSH Term

Humans
Adolescent
Male
Female
Academic Performance
Cross-Sectional Studies
Spain
Fast Foods
Child
Diet
Feeding Behavior
Food, Processed

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0academicUPFperformanceconsumption60studyadolescents5vslinkqualityfoodsampleageAcademicmodelsadjustedindicatorshigherconsistentlyassociatedlowergradepointaveragelanguagemathsEnglishtertile72PreviousstudiestesteddietyoungpopulationHoweveranalyzedspecificrelationshipultra-processedaimpresenttestSpainsecondarycross-sectionalanalysisutilizedinformation788youthsaged12-17participatingEatingHealthyDailyLifeActivitiescomprised447%boys553%girlsmedian14yearsinterquartilerange[IQR]:1315measuredself-completedfrequencysurveydeterminedusingend-of-yearrecordsprovidededucationalinstitutionexaminerelationshipsvariablesgeneralizedlinearemployedfactorsincludingsexsocioeconomicstatusconductphysicalactivitysleepdurationbodymassindexsedentarybehaviorSignificantdose-responseassociationsdifferentshowingpoorer<001HigherdailyservingsmarginalmeansFurthermorehighestcomparedlowestsimilarpatternsobservedidentifiesnegativeassociationhighlightingmodifiablefactorimpactoutcomesAdolescentsexhibitedgradesacrossvariousemphasizingimportancedietarycriticaldevelopmentalperiodInvestigatingRelationshipUltra-ProcessedFoodConsumptionPerformanceAdolescentPopulation:EHDLAStudyNOVAclassificationhealthyeatinghabitsnutritionschoolyouth

Similar Articles

Cited By