The Association Between Metabolic Syndrome and the Risk of Endometrial Cancer in Pre- and Post-Menopausal Women: A UK Biobank Study.

Rebecca Karkia, Gideon Maccarthy, Annette Payne, Emmanouil Karteris, Raha Pazoki, Jayanta Chatterjee
Author Information
  1. Rebecca Karkia: College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK. ORCID
  2. Gideon Maccarthy: College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK.
  3. Annette Payne: Department of Information Systems and Computing, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK. ORCID
  4. Emmanouil Karteris: College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK.
  5. Raha Pazoki: College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK.
  6. Jayanta Chatterjee: College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK. ORCID

Abstract

Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) is a syndrome that comprises central obesity, increased serum triglyceride (TG) levels, decreased serum HDL cholesterol (HDL) levels, raised blood pressure (BP), and impaired glucose regulation, including prediabetic and diabetic glycaemic levels. Recently, the association with Endometrial Cancer (EC) has been described but it is unclear if the risk associated with MetS is higher than the individual effect of obesity alone. This study investigates the association between MetS components and differing MetS definitions on EC risk and compares the risk of MetS with the risk posed by obesity alone. It also analyses how MetS affects the risk of EC development in the pre- and post-menopausal subgroups. A prospective cohort study was undertaken using data from the UK biobank. Multivariable Cox proportional risk models with the time to diagnosis (years) were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of MetS and its components on the risk of EC. A subgroup analysis was also undertaken for pre- and post-menopausal participants. Kaplan-Meier (KM) was undertaken to assess the difference in the risk of EC development in differing BMI classes, and in pre- and post-menopausal subgroups. A total of 177,005 females from the UK biobank were included in this study. Of those participants who developed EC ( = 1454), waist circumference > 80 cm, BMI > 30 kg/m, hypertension > 130/80 mmHg, hyperlipidaemia and diabetes (HbA1C > 48 mmol/L were significant predictors of EC development, with waist circumference being the strongest predictor (HR = 2.21; 95% CI: 1.98-2.47, < 0.001). Comparing the pre- and post-menopausal subgroup, hypertriglyceridaemia and diabetes were the strongest predictors of EC in the pre-menopausal subgroup (HR = 1.53; 95% CI: 1.18-1.99 and HR = 1.51; 95% CI: 1.08-2.12, < 0.05, respectively). Raised waist circumference was not a significant independent predictor in the pre-menopausal subgroup. A KM curve analysis showed a clear distinction between those with and without MetS in the pre-menopausal group, suggesting a benefit of testing for MetS components in pre-menopausal Women with obesity. Components of MetS, both independently and in combination, significantly increase the risk of EC. Screening those with obesity for MetS in their pre-menopausal years may help to identify those at the highest risk.

Keywords

References

  1. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2023 Mar;15(1):3-23 [PMID: 37010330]
  2. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2022 Jul;30(7):1323-1334 [PMID: 35785479]
  3. Int J Cancer. 2019 Feb 1;144(3):641-650 [PMID: 30289975]
  4. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2421305 [PMID: 38967919]
  5. Cancer Causes Control. 2015 Feb;26(2):287-296 [PMID: 25534916]
  6. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Feb;16(2):276-80 [PMID: 17301260]
  7. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Nov;29(9):1361-1371 [PMID: 31451560]
  8. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Mar 24;24(7): [PMID: 37047163]
  9. Diabet Med. 2006 May;23(5):469-80 [PMID: 16681555]
  10. Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 22;13(15): [PMID: 34359595]
  11. Aust Health Rev. 2023 Dec;47(6):735-740 [PMID: 38029447]
  12. Circulation. 2002 Dec 17;106(25):3143-421 [PMID: 12485966]
  13. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Jan 30;49(4):403-14 [PMID: 17258085]
  14. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jun;125(3):734-41 [PMID: 22426488]
  15. Diabetes Care. 2012 Nov;35(11):2402-11 [PMID: 23093685]
  16. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 27;10:CD012214 [PMID: 29077194]
  17. Circulation. 2009 Oct 20;120(16):1640-5 [PMID: 19805654]
  18. Int J Cancer. 2007 Jun 15;120(12):2656-64 [PMID: 17285578]
  19. Int J Cancer. 2004 Jan 20;108(3):425-32 [PMID: 14648710]
  20. Cancer Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;39(4):567-570 [PMID: 26065406]
  21. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jul;179(1):6-12 [PMID: 9704758]
  22. Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Apr;161(1):143-151 [PMID: 33762086]
  23. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Oct;36(10):2215-2225 [PMID: 34331119]
  24. Cancer Causes Control. 2007 May;18(4):399-413 [PMID: 17297555]
  25. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2016;208:107-136 [PMID: 27909905]
  26. Lancet. 2005 Apr 16-22;365(9468):1415-28 [PMID: 15836891]
  27. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2000;894:i-xii, 1-253 [PMID: 11234459]
  28. Int J Cancer. 2004 Jan 10;108(2):262-8 [PMID: 14639613]
  29. Cancer Causes Control. 2010 Sep;21(9):1407-16 [PMID: 20431936]

Grants

  1. BRIEF AWARDS 2021/Brunel University

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0MetSriskECobesity1pre-menopausalpre-post-menopausalUKHR95%subgroup=>syndromelevelsstudycomponentsdevelopmentundertakenwaistcircumferenceCI:MetabolicserumHDLassociationendometrialcanceralonedifferingalsosubgroupsbiobankyearsanalysisparticipantsKMBMIdiabetessignificantpredictorsstrongestpredictor<0BiobankcomprisescentralincreasedtriglycerideTGdecreasedcholesterolraisedbloodpressureBPimpairedglucoseregulationincludingprediabeticdiabeticglycaemicRecentlydescribedunclearassociatedhigherindividualeffectinvestigatesdefinitionscomparesposedanalysesaffectsprospectivecohortusingdataMultivariableCoxproportionalmodelstimediagnosisusedestimatehazardratioconfidenceintervalCIKaplan-Meierassessdifferenceclassestotal177005femalesincludeddeveloped145480cm30kg/mhypertension130/80mmHghyperlipidaemiaHbA1C48mmol/L22198-247001Comparinghypertriglyceridaemia5318-1995108-21205respectivelyRaisedindependentcurveshowedcleardistinctionwithoutgroupsuggestingbenefittestingwomenComponentsindependentlycombinationsignificantlyincreaseScreeningmayhelpidentifyhighestAssociationSyndromeRiskEndometrialCancerPre-Post-MenopausalWomen:Studyadipokinesmetabolicstratification

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.