Development and validation of a questionnaire for table tennis teaching in physical education.

Miguel ��ngel Ortega-Zayas, Antonio Jos�� Cardona-Linares, Alberto Qu��lez, Alejandro Garc��a-Gim��nez, Miguel Lecina, Francisco Pradas
Author Information
  1. Miguel ��ngel Ortega-Zayas: ENFYRED Research Group, Faculty of Health and Sports Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Huesca, Spain.
  2. Antonio Jos�� Cardona-Linares: ENFYRED Research Group, Faculty of Health and Sports Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Huesca, Spain.
  3. Alberto Qu��lez: Faculty of Human Sciences and Education, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
  4. Alejandro Garc��a-Gim��nez: Faculty of Health Sciences, ENFYRED Research Group, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
  5. Miguel Lecina: ENFYRED Research Group, Faculty of Health and Sports Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Huesca, Spain.
  6. Francisco Pradas: ENFYRED Research Group, Faculty of Health and Sports Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Huesca, Spain.

Abstract

This study aimed to validate the "Racquet Sports Attitude Scale (RSAS)" questionnaire intended for the educational field. The RSAS is a Spanish instrument developed using the Delphi method and consists of 42 questions divided into five subsections benefits of table tennis (TT), facilitators for the application of TT, barriers to applying tennis table in physical education (PE), difficulties in applying the tennis table as a PE content and positive attitude toward racket sports), designed to evaluate the use and impact of the practice of the racket sports, in particular TT, among PE teachers. The semantic validation process involved a panel of experts (���=���16), followed by an evaluation carried out by a group of teachers from various secondary schools (���=���20). Three studies were conducted, the first of which was descriptive, comparative and correlational, to establish the data's sociodemographic characteristics. The second was an exploratory factor analysis to confirm the number of dimensions of the questionnaire and its reliability and validity. The last study was a confirmatory factor analysis (to establish the final number of items and their structure. The ordinal alpha values ranged from 0.65 to 0.72, obtaining an average value of 0.70, indicating coherence between the measurement of the items. Chi-square values (X���=���197.383; ���<���0.001; CFI���=���0.934; TLI���=���0.923 and RMSEA���=���0.030), showed that the original 5-factor model and 21 final items prevailed over the one-factor model, obtaining values >0.90. On the other hand, the validation results indicated that the factor structure of the RSAS scale was able to explain 46.72% of the variance (F1���=���13.93%; F2���=���10.97%; F3���=���8.57%; F4���=���6.85%; F5���=���6.38). It can be concluded that the structure of the RSAS is fully confirmed by the statistical analyses derived from the different models of structured equations and confirmatory factor analysis, suggesting that the validated model optimally addresses the data provided and contributes to the validation of the questionnaire under study.

Keywords

References

  1. Nutrients. 2024 Jun 15;16(12): [PMID: 38931245]
  2. J Sports Sci. 2018 Dec;36(23):2653-2662 [PMID: 29543111]
  3. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 19;19(14): [PMID: 35886616]
  4. Children (Basel). 2024 Aug 10;11(8): [PMID: 39201898]
  5. Sports (Basel). 2024 Aug 22;12(8): [PMID: 39195604]
  6. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 12;18(22): [PMID: 34831651]
  7. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 05;18(5): [PMID: 33807910]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0questionnaireRSAStabletennisvalidationfactorstudyTTphysicaleducationPEracketsportsanalysisitemsstructurevalues0modeleducationalapplyingcontentteachersestablishnumberconfirmatoryfinalobtainingaimedvalidate"RacquetSportsAttitudeScale"intendedfieldSpanishinstrumentdevelopedusingDelphimethodconsists42questionsdividedfivesubsectionsbenefitsfacilitatorsapplicationbarriersdifficultiespositiveattitudetowarddesignedevaluateuseimpactpracticeparticularamongsemanticprocessinvolvedpanelexperts���=���16followedevaluationcarriedgroupvarioussecondaryschools���=���20Threestudiesconductedfirstdescriptivecomparativecorrelationaldata'ssociodemographiccharacteristicssecondexploratoryconfirmdimensionsreliabilityvaliditylastordinalalpharanged6572averagevalue70indicatingcoherencemeasurementChi-squareX���=���197383���<���0001CFI���=���0934TLI���=���0923RMSEA���=���0030showedoriginal5-factor21prevailedone-factor>090handresultsindicatedscaleableexplain4672%varianceF1���=���1393%F2���=���1097%F3���=���857%F4���=���685%F5���=���638canconcludedfullyconfirmedstatisticalanalysesderiveddifferentmodelsstructuredequationssuggestingvalidatedoptimallyaddressesdataprovidedcontributesDevelopmentteachingteacherskills

Similar Articles

Cited By