Reviewing Mobile Apps for Teaching Human Anatomy: Search and Quality Evaluation Study.

Guadalupe Esmeralda Rivera Garc��a, Miriam Janet Cervantes L��pez, Juan Carlos Ram��rez V��zquez, Arturo Llanes Castillo, Jaime Cruz Casados
Author Information
  1. Guadalupe Esmeralda Rivera Garc��a: Tecnol��gico Nacional de M��xico, Instituto Tecnol��gico Superior de P��nuco, P��nuco, Veracruz, Mexico. ORCID
  2. Miriam Janet Cervantes L��pez: Facultad de Medicina de Tampico "Dr. Alberto Romo Caballero" de la Universidad Aut��noma de Tamaulipas, Tampico, Tamaulipas, Mexico. ORCID
  3. Juan Carlos Ram��rez V��zquez: Tecnol��gico Nacional de M��xico, Instituto Tecnol��gico Superior de P��nuco, P��nuco, Veracruz, Mexico. ORCID
  4. Arturo Llanes Castillo: Facultad de Medicina de Tampico "Dr. Alberto Romo Caballero" de la Universidad Aut��noma de Tamaulipas, Tampico, Tamaulipas, Mexico. ORCID
  5. Jaime Cruz Casados: Facultad de Medicina de Tampico "Dr. Alberto Romo Caballero" de la Universidad Aut��noma de Tamaulipas, Tampico, Tamaulipas, Mexico. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mobile apps designed for teaching human anatomy offer a flexible, interactive, and personalized learning platform, enriching the educational experience for both students and health care professionals.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the human anatomy mobile apps available on Google Play, evaluate their quality, highlight the highest scoring apps, and determine the relationship between objective quality ratings and subjective star ratings.
METHODS: The Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) was used to evaluate the apps. The intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated using a consistency-type 2-factor random model to measure the reliability of the evaluations made by the experts. In addition, Pearson correlations were used to analyze the relationship between MARS quality scores and subjective evaluations of MARS quality item 23.
RESULTS: The mobile apps with the highest overall quality scores according to the MARS (ie, sections A, B, C, and D) were Organos internos 3D (anatom��a) (version 4.34), Sistema ��seo en 3D (Anatom��a) (version 4.32), and VOKA Anatomy Pro (version 4.29). To measure the reliability of the MARS quality evaluations (sections A, B, C, and D), the intraclass correlation coefficient was used, and the result was "excellent." Finally, Pearson correlation results revealed a significant relationship (r=0.989; P<.001) between the quality assessments conducted by health care professionals and the subjective evaluations of item 23.
CONCLUSIONS: The average evaluation results of the selected apps indicated a "good" level of quality, and those with the highest ratings could be recommended. However, the lack of scientific backing for these technological tools is evident. It is crucial that research centers and higher education institutions commit to the active development of new mobile health apps, ensuring their accessibility and validation for the general public.

Keywords

References

  1. Nutrients. 2023 Mar 17;15(6): [PMID: 36986180]
  2. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 16;8(9):e18339 [PMID: 32936078]
  3. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Sep 14;11(18): [PMID: 37761746]
  4. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022 Aug 1;9(3):e34355 [PMID: 35916688]
  5. Anat Sci Educ. 2016 Oct;9(5):411-21 [PMID: 26950521]
  6. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 27;18(11): [PMID: 34071884]
  7. Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 31;12(3): [PMID: 38338253]
  8. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Mar 14;10(3):e35879 [PMID: 35285817]
  9. Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Apr 30;12(9): [PMID: 38727486]
  10. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Oct 13;14:1901-1909 [PMID: 33116434]
  11. Nutrients. 2023 Aug 24;15(17): [PMID: 37686731]
  12. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Nov 19;11(22): [PMID: 37998477]
  13. Children (Basel). 2018 Jan 26;5(2): [PMID: 29373515]
  14. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Sep 04;7(9):e12604 [PMID: 31486408]
  15. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 28;18(7): [PMID: 33800531]
  16. Genet Med. 2017 Jul;19(7):725-732 [PMID: 27763635]
  17. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 May 26;10(5):e34017 [PMID: 35617014]
  18. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Oct 25;6(10):e10718 [PMID: 30361196]
  19. J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63 [PMID: 27330520]
  20. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 20;19(19): [PMID: 36231181]
  21. BMJ. 2007 Oct 20;335(7624):806-8 [PMID: 17947786]
  22. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 26;8(11):e11968 [PMID: 33242014]
  23. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 23;19(19): [PMID: 36231327]
  24. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Sep 11;7(9):e13608 [PMID: 31512580]
  25. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Oct 30;7(10):e14198 [PMID: 31670695]
  26. Vision (Basel). 2022 Feb 18;6(1): [PMID: 35225972]
  27. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 06;14(15): [PMID: 35954479]
  28. Br Dent J. 2019 Sep;227(5):383-386 [PMID: 31520041]
  29. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 30;18(19): [PMID: 34639623]
  30. Netw Model Anal Health Inform Bioinform. 2023;12(1):25 [PMID: 37305790]
  31. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 01;19(19): [PMID: 36231862]
  32. Sensors (Basel). 2023 Mar 27;23(7): [PMID: 37050561]
  33. Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Feb 08;12(4): [PMID: 38391818]
  34. Iran J Public Health. 2021 Mar;50(3):459-469 [PMID: 34178793]
  35. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 27;18(23): [PMID: 34886232]
  36. Med Educ. 2018 Nov;52(11):1138-1146 [PMID: 30345680]
  37. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 09;17(24): [PMID: 33317134]
  38. J Pers Med. 2022 Sep 28;12(10): [PMID: 36294738]
  39. J Med Libr Assoc. 2020 Apr;108(2):295-303 [PMID: 32256241]
  40. Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 25;12(7): [PMID: 38610142]
  41. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 18;19(3): [PMID: 35162049]
  42. Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jun 23;10(7): [PMID: 35885700]
  43. Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jan 16;24(2): [PMID: 38257659]
  44. Semergen. 2023 Apr;49(3):101907 [PMID: 36577284]
  45. Anat Sci Educ. 2017 Nov;10(6):549-559 [PMID: 28419750]
  46. Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Mar 14;10(3): [PMID: 35327013]
  47. Life (Basel). 2024 Jun 13;14(6): [PMID: 38929744]
  48. Chest. 2020 Jul;158(1S):S65-S71 [PMID: 32658654]
  49. Nutrients. 2022 Mar 18;14(6): [PMID: 35334947]
  50. Curr Oncol. 2023 Jul 25;30(8):7151-7166 [PMID: 37622999]
  51. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 21;20(1): [PMID: 36612402]
  52. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Mar 11;3(1):e27 [PMID: 25760773]
  53. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Aug 29;11:e42415 [PMID: 37642999]
  54. Life (Basel). 2023 Oct 05;13(10): [PMID: 37895396]
  55. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 16;19(16): [PMID: 36011765]
  56. Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 08;12(2): [PMID: 38255029]
  57. J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 5;24(10):e37497 [PMID: 36197717]

MeSH Term

Humans
Mobile Applications
Anatomy
Reproducibility of Results

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0qualityappsMARSMobilehealthmobileevaluationsanatomyhighestrelationshipratingssubjectiveusedcorrelationversion4humancareprofessionalsGooglePlayevaluateAppRatingScaleintraclasscoefficientmeasurereliabilityPearsonscoresitem23sectionsBCD3DresultsBACKGROUND:designedteachingofferflexibleinteractivepersonalizedlearningplatformenrichingeducationalexperiencestudentsOBJECTIVE:studyaimedconductsystematicreviewavailablehighlightscoringdetermineobjectivestarMETHODS:calculatedusingconsistency-type2-factorrandommodelmadeexpertsadditioncorrelationsanalyzeRESULTS:overallaccordingieOrganosinternosanatom��a34Sistema��seoenAnatom��a32VOKAAnatomyPro29result"excellent"Finallyrevealedsignificantr=0989P<001assessmentsconductedCONCLUSIONS:averageevaluationselectedindicated"good"levelrecommendedHoweverlackscientificbackingtechnologicaltoolsevidentcrucialresearchcentershighereducationinstitutionscommitactivedevelopmentnewensuringaccessibilityvalidationgeneralpublicReviewingAppsTeachingHumanAnatomy:SearchQualityEvaluationStudymHealth

Similar Articles

Cited By