Gender differences in symptom interactions between problematic smartphone use and social anxiety in adolescents: a network analysis.

Sipu Guo, Xinyuan Zou, Yanqiang Tao, Yichao Lv, Xiangping Liu, Silin Huang
Author Information
  1. Sipu Guo: Institute of Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, 19, Xinjiekouwai Street, Beijing, 100875, China. ORCID
  2. Xinyuan Zou: Institute of Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, 19, Xinjiekouwai Street, Beijing, 100875, China. ORCID
  3. Yanqiang Tao: Institute of Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, 19, Xinjiekouwai Street, Beijing, 100875, China. ORCID
  4. Yichao Lv: Institute of Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, 19, Xinjiekouwai Street, Beijing, 100875, China. ORCID
  5. Xiangping Liu: Institute of Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, 19, Xinjiekouwai Street, Beijing, 100875, China. ORCID
  6. Silin Huang: Institute of Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, 19, Xinjiekouwai Street, Beijing, 100875, China. hsilin@bnu.edu.cn. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increased prevalence of problematic smartphone use (PSU) in adolescents, results in a cycle of interaction between PSU and social anxiety. However, it is still unknown whether PSU and social anxiety symptoms have interacted among adolescents and whether there are gender differences in these symptoms. Therefore, this study investigated the gender differences in the symptom interactions between PSU and social anxiety via symptom network analysis.
METHODS: This study included 2918 adolescents (52.71% boys; M = 14.73, SD = 1.39) from junior and senior high schools in China. The Mobile Phone Addiction Index and Social Anxiety Scale were used to evaluate symptomatology and networks. Network analysis and network comparison tests were used to determine the network structure, centrality, bridge symptoms and gender differences in the PSU-social anxiety network among adolescents.
RESULTS: The most influential symptoms were "productivity loss" and "afraid of negative evaluation". "Afraid of negative evaluation" was the bridge through which PSU was related to social anxiety. Gender differences were not found in network strength but occurred in network structure. Although girls reported more social anxiety, boys had a tighter network structure. The correlation between PSU and social anxiety was greater in boys than in girls. The "inability to control craving" was particularly critical for girls, while "feeling anxious and lost" was prominent for boys.
CONCLUSIONS: The current study highlights the symptom interactions between PSU and social anxiety among adolescents and the gender differences in network structures. Further intervention that targets "afraid of negative evaluation" may disassociate the interaction between PSU and social anxiety symptoms. In particular, changing girls' cognitive ability (e.g., inhibition) and boys' negative emotions are potentially effective means of intervention. The limitations of the cross-sectional design and data-driven methodology necessitate interpreting the results with caution.

Keywords

References

  1. J Behav Addict. 2021 Aug 18;10(3):811-826 [PMID: 34406975]
  2. J Anxiety Disord. 2019 Mar;62:45-52 [PMID: 30529799]
  3. Body Image. 2020 Dec;35:108-113 [PMID: 32979632]
  4. Psychiatry Res. 2018 Apr;262:618-623 [PMID: 28982630]
  5. Psychol Med. 2023 Apr;53(5):2176-2178 [PMID: 34001293]
  6. Behav Res Ther. 2019 Dec;123:103501 [PMID: 31733812]
  7. Addict Behav. 2020 Sep;108:106363 [PMID: 32434104]
  8. Psychol Med. 2020 Feb;50(3):353-366 [PMID: 31875792]
  9. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018 Nov;27(11):1449-1457 [PMID: 29520540]
  10. Front Psychiatry. 2016 Oct 24;7:175 [PMID: 27822187]
  11. J Behav Addict. 2024 Jan 09;13(1):102-119 [PMID: 38206330]
  12. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 25;16(19): [PMID: 31557844]
  13. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2024 Feb;55(1):195-205 [PMID: 35790648]
  14. Psychiatry Res. 2018 Dec;270:97-103 [PMID: 30245382]
  15. Psychol Methods. 2023 Dec;28(6):1273-1285 [PMID: 35404628]
  16. Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 02;8:1305 [PMID: 28824490]
  17. Psychiatry Res. 2019 Jan;271:526-531 [PMID: 30553099]
  18. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2019 Jul;32(4):376-386 [PMID: 30924366]
  19. World Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;16(1):5-13 [PMID: 28127906]
  20. Behav Res Methods. 2018 Feb;50(1):195-212 [PMID: 28342071]
  21. J Behav Addict. 2020 Apr 01;9(1):163-174 [PMID: 32359238]
  22. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2011;7:1-38 [PMID: 21275642]
  23. Addict Behav. 2023 Sep;144:107725 [PMID: 37087768]
  24. Pers Individ Dif. 2011 Dec;51(8):952-957 [PMID: 22131614]
  25. Psychol Assess. 2005 Jun;17(2):179-90 [PMID: 16029105]
  26. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1998 Apr;26(2):83-94 [PMID: 9634131]
  27. J Anxiety Disord. 2024 Jun;104:102874 [PMID: 38754336]
  28. Curr Psychol. 2022 Jun 27;:1-12 [PMID: 35789632]
  29. Behav Res Methods. 2018 Apr;50(2):853-861 [PMID: 28718088]
  30. Eur J Pediatr. 2016 Mar;175(3):355-64 [PMID: 26475349]
  31. Soc Neurosci. 2018 Feb;13(1):94-103 [PMID: 27820680]
  32. Body Image. 2021 Dec;39:305-312 [PMID: 34749263]
  33. BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Oct 10;17(1):341 [PMID: 29017482]
  34. Behav Res Ther. 1999 Sep;37(9):831-43 [PMID: 10458047]
  35. J Behav Addict. 2014 Dec;3(4):254-65 [PMID: 25595966]
  36. Multivariate Behav Res. 2021 Mar-Apr;56(2):353-367 [PMID: 31179765]
  37. J Am Coll Health. 2018 Oct;66(7):693-701 [PMID: 29565784]
  38. Aggress Behav. 2011 Jul-Aug;37(4):302-14 [PMID: 21484817]
  39. Front Psychiatry. 2024 Nov 12;15:1467141 [PMID: 39600795]
  40. Lancet. 2008 Mar 29;371(9618):1115-25 [PMID: 18374843]

Grants

  1. 32071071/National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. 18YJA190003/Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0anxietysocialnetworkPSUdifferencesadolescentssymptomsgendersymptomanalysisboysnegativesmartphoneuseamongstudyinteractionsstructureevaluation"GendergirlsproblematicresultsinteractionwhetherSocialusedNetworkbridge"afraidinterventionBACKGROUND:IncreasedprevalencecycleHoweverstillunknowninteractedThereforeinvestigatedviaMETHODS:included29185271%M = 1473SD = 139juniorseniorhighschoolsChinaMobilePhoneAddictionIndexAnxietyScaleevaluatesymptomatologynetworkscomparisontestsdeterminecentralityPSU-socialRESULTS:influential"productivityloss""AfraidrelatedfoundstrengthoccurredAlthoughreportedtightercorrelationgreater"inabilitycontrolcraving"particularlycritical"feelinganxiouslost"prominentCONCLUSIONS:currenthighlightsstructurestargetsmaydisassociateparticularchanginggirls'cognitiveabilityeginhibitionboys'emotionspotentiallyeffectivemeanslimitationscross-sectionaldesigndata-drivenmethodologynecessitateinterpretingcautionadolescents:AdolescentdifferenceProblematic

Similar Articles

Cited By