Simulation-Based Learning Supported by Technology to Enhance Critical Thinking in Nursing Students: Scoping Review.

Hege Vistven Stenseth, Simen A Steindal, Marianne Trygg Solberg, Mia Alexandra ��lnes, Anne Lene S��rensen, Camilla Strandell-Laine, Camilla Olaussen, Caroline Farsj�� Aure, Ingunn Pedersen, Jaroslav Zlamal, Jussara Gue Martini, Paula Bresolin, Silje Christin Wang Linnerud, Andr��a Aparecida Gon��alves Nes
Author Information
  1. Hege Vistven Stenseth: Department of Graduate Studies, Faculty of Nursing, Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway. ORCID
  2. Simen A Steindal: Department of Graduate Studies, Faculty of Nursing, Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway. ORCID
  3. Marianne Trygg Solberg: Department of Graduate Studies, Faculty of Nursing, Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway. ORCID
  4. Mia Alexandra ��lnes: Department of Graduate Studies, Faculty of Nursing, Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway. ORCID
  5. Anne Lene S��rensen: Department of Graduate Studies, Faculty of Nursing, Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway. ORCID
  6. Camilla Strandell-Laine: Department of Graduate Studies, Faculty of Nursing, Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway. ORCID
  7. Camilla Olaussen: Department of Graduate Studies, Faculty of Nursing, Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway. ORCID
  8. Caroline Farsj�� Aure: Department of Graduate Studies, Faculty of Nursing, Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway. ORCID
  9. Ingunn Pedersen: Nord University, Bod��, Norway. ORCID
  10. Jaroslav Zlamal: Department of Graduate Studies, Faculty of Nursing, Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway. ORCID
  11. Jussara Gue Martini: Postgraduate Program in Nursing, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florian��polis, Brazil. ORCID
  12. Paula Bresolin: Postgraduate Program in Nursing, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florian��polis, Brazil. ORCID
  13. Silje Christin Wang Linnerud: Department of Graduate Studies, Faculty of Nursing, Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway. ORCID
  14. Andr��a Aparecida Gon��alves Nes: Department of Graduate Studies, Faculty of Nursing, Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Critical thinking is a crucial skill in the nursing profession and must be fostered through nursing education. Simulation-based learning (SBL) with technological modalities is a pedagogical approach to enhance critical thinking skills for nursing students. The use of technology in SBL to achieve critical thinking skills is diverse. No previous scoping review has systematically mapped studies on SBL supported by technology to enhance critical thinking in nursing students.
OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aimed to systematically map research on the use of SBL supported by technology to enhance critical thinking in nursing students.
METHODS: This scoping review was conducted according to the framework by Arksey and O'Malley and was reported according to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. A systematic, comprehensive literature search was performed in the LILACS, ERIC, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases in 2021 and repeated in 2023 and 2024. Pairs of authors independently assessed titles, abstracts, and full-text papers and extracted data from the included studies. The data underwent summative and thematic analysis and were categorized according to the findings.
RESULTS: In total, 4 main categories of technology applied in SBL were identified: computer-based simulations, human-patient simulators, virtual reality or immersive virtual reality, and others. The findings revealed a shift across time in the technology used for SBL to enhance critical thinking, from human patient simulators to computer-based simulations. A dominant part of the included studies published after 2018 (21/44, 48%) incorporated a combination of asynchronous and synchronous learning activities. The theoretical foundation of the studies revealed a range of scientific theories and conceptual frameworks and models. Enablers of or barriers to the enhancement of critical thinking skills in nursing students were identified within the following themes: affinity for and availability of technology, realism, accessibility, engagement and motivation, validation, return on investment, and enhanced critical thinking through SBL using technology.
CONCLUSIONS: There has been a noticeable shift in the technology and use of technology in SBL. Descriptions of the applied technology and pedagogical considerations are pivotal for comparing or synthesizing research results. There has been a trend toward a blended educational approach combining synchronous and asynchronous learning activities. User technological proficiency and the perceived quality of the technology are imperative in the development of critical thinking. Realism, engagement, and motivation play pivotal roles in the enhancement of critical thinking in technologically supported SBL. The establishment of robust theoretical foundations of research and standardized research practices will strengthen the evidence obtained from the research conducted.

Keywords

References

  1. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2010;8(16):661-694 [PMID: 27820553]
  2. Acad Med. 2020 Jul;95(7):989-994 [PMID: 31725464]
  3. Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Jun;33(6):648-54 [PMID: 22341995]
  4. Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Feb;109:105245 [PMID: 34952302]
  5. Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 Feb;75:103899 [PMID: 38277799]
  6. BMC Med Educ. 2023 Sep 28;23(1):710 [PMID: 37770884]
  7. Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Mar;98:104739 [PMID: 33418087]
  8. BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jan 5;24(1):32 [PMID: 38183036]
  9. Comput Inform Nurs. 2023 Dec 01;41(12):1016-1025 [PMID: 37647622]
  10. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2011 Jul-Aug;32(4):256-8 [PMID: 21923007]
  11. Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Oct;45:22-8 [PMID: 27429399]
  12. J Nurs Educ. 2010 Nov;49(11):632-9 [PMID: 20795614]
  13. Cureus. 2024 Feb 8;16(2):e53830 [PMID: 38465156]
  14. Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Sep;92:104494 [PMID: 32544764]
  15. Nursing. 2020 Jul;50(7):14-19 [PMID: 32472824]
  16. North Clin Istanb. 2024 Oct 02;11(5):422-433 [PMID: 39431025]
  17. J Prof Nurs. 2023 Jan-Feb;44:1-7 [PMID: 36746594]
  18. Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2018 Jul 23;39:e20170097 [PMID: 30043943]
  19. BMC Nurs. 2024 Jun 17;23(1):400 [PMID: 38886708]
  20. Comput Inform Nurs. 2020 Dec;38(12):613-624 [PMID: 32520782]
  21. Nurse Educ Today. 2011 Oct;31(7):664-70 [PMID: 21056920]
  22. Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Mar;98:104661 [PMID: 33298327]
  23. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2008;5:Article17 [PMID: 18454731]
  24. J Nurs Educ. 1991 Jan;30(1):34-9 [PMID: 1847408]
  25. SAGE Open Nurs. 2023 May 18;9:23779608231177566 [PMID: 37223219]
  26. BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 7;24(1):1099 [PMID: 39375684]
  27. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71 [PMID: 33782057]
  28. J Emerg Nurs. 2013 Nov;39(6):660-6 [PMID: 22421315]
  29. Nurse Educ. 2023 Nov-Dec 01;48(6):298-303 [PMID: 37043289]
  30. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2006 Jul-Sep;29(3):188-98 [PMID: 16862020]
  31. Int J Nurs Stud. 2005 Mar;42(3):333-40 [PMID: 15708020]
  32. Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Jan;60:114-120 [PMID: 29096383]
  33. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2012 Jul;25(1):11-5 [PMID: 23787379]
  34. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2013 May-Jun;34(3):159-62 [PMID: 23914457]
  35. Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Sep;116:105426 [PMID: 35679627]
  36. Nurs Outlook. 2021 Sep-Oct;69(5):903-912 [PMID: 34183191]
  37. Simul Healthc. 2018 Jun;13(3S Suppl 1):S7-S14 [PMID: 29369961]
  38. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 Jun 30;6(4):214-219 [PMID: 35520006]
  39. J Prof Nurs. 2021 Mar-Apr;37(2):320-334 [PMID: 33867086]
  40. Games Health J. 2024 Dec;13(6):466-476 [PMID: 39093826]
  41. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:40-6 [PMID: 27005575]
  42. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 Nov 1;6(6):317-319 [PMID: 35515494]
  43. J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 5;22(5):e16218 [PMID: 32369037]
  44. Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2017;38(3):e75576 [PMID: 29641771]
  45. Comput Inform Nurs. 2012 Apr;30(4):196-203 [PMID: 22228217]
  46. Nurse Educ Pract. 2021 Nov;57:103220 [PMID: 34781195]
  47. Clin Simul Nurs. 2021 Aug;57:31-40 [PMID: 35915811]
  48. Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Jan;108:105213 [PMID: 34798476]
  49. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Jul;104(3):240-3 [PMID: 27366130]
  50. Nurse Educ Today. 2019 Feb;73:94-101 [PMID: 30610960]
  51. Qual Health Res. 2012 Oct;22(10):1435-43 [PMID: 22829486]
  52. Clin Simul Nurs. 2022 Aug;69:26-39 [PMID: 35754937]
  53. Nurs Clin North Am. 2012 Dec;47(4):481-91 [PMID: 23137600]
  54. Nurs Open. 2021 Nov;8(6):3045-3054 [PMID: 34331397]
  55. J Prof Nurs. 2020 Sep - Oct;36(5):292-300 [PMID: 33039061]
  56. J Nurs Educ. 1986 Oct;25(8):319-24 [PMID: 3023568]
  57. BMC Nurs. 2023 Dec 19;22(1):488 [PMID: 38114940]
  58. Nurs Open. 2022 Mar;9(2):1066-1076 [PMID: 34851042]
  59. Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Feb;67:103548 [PMID: 36708638]
  60. Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Sep;92:104490 [PMID: 32516637]
  61. BMC Med Educ. 2020 Feb 19;20(1):53 [PMID: 32075641]
  62. Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Apr;35(4):537-42 [PMID: 25549985]
  63. Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Mar;98:104662 [PMID: 33203545]
  64. Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Sep;104:104998 [PMID: 34139583]
  65. J Nurs Res. 2024 Oct 01;32(5):e348 [PMID: 39360862]
  66. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Jul;16(4):854-863 [PMID: 33593177]
  67. Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Oct;69:122-127 [PMID: 30048812]
  68. Comput Inform Nurs. 2023 Jun 01;41(6):467-476 [PMID: 36633879]
  69. J Nurs Educ. 2008 Nov;47(11):501-7 [PMID: 19010048]
  70. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 13;11(8): [PMID: 37107957]
  71. Nurse Educ. 2006 Nov-Dec;31(6):253-8 [PMID: 17108788]
  72. J Nurs Educ. 2012 Jun;51(6):349-52 [PMID: 22533501]
  73. BMC Nurs. 2022 Apr 27;21(1):100 [PMID: 35473614]
  74. JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Apr 4;11(4):e36725 [PMID: 35373777]
  75. BMC Med Educ. 2022 Nov 10;22(1):775 [PMID: 36357886]
  76. Nurse Educ. 2024 Nov-Dec 01;49(6):E315-E320 [PMID: 38502593]
  77. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473 [PMID: 30178033]
  78. BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Mar 29;22(1):30 [PMID: 36991463]
  79. J Adv Nurs. 2010 Oct;66(10):2182-93 [PMID: 20636471]
  80. J Pediatr Nurs. 2024 Sep-Oct;78:e432-e437 [PMID: 39122581]
  81. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2022 Sep-Oct 01;41(5):235-245 [PMID: 35905425]
  82. Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Dec;34(12):1435-42 [PMID: 25156144]
  83. Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Nov;46:36-42 [PMID: 27591378]
  84. Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Feb;49:63-71 [PMID: 27902949]
  85. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Jan 11;17:191-202 [PMID: 38226028]
  86. Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210 [PMID: 27919275]
  87. J Nurs Educ. 2024 Jul;63(7):485-489 [PMID: 37499252]
  88. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Feb;102:103466 [PMID: 31783192]
  89. Comput Inform Nurs. 2023 Jun 01;41(6):410-420 [PMID: 36729896]
  90. J Nurs Educ. 2008 Dec;47(12):557-62 [PMID: 19112746]
  91. Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Sep 17;9(9): [PMID: 34575002]
  92. Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Feb;49:106-109 [PMID: 27902948]
  93. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2013 Nov-Dec;34(6):405-9 [PMID: 24475603]
  94. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2022 Jan-Feb 01;43(1):49-50 [PMID: 34939771]
  95. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 18;21(3):e11529 [PMID: 30882355]
  96. Simul Healthc. 2020 Feb;15(1):46-54 [PMID: 32028447]
  97. BMC Public Health. 2012 Jul 02;12:497 [PMID: 22747988]
  98. Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Jul;62:103375 [PMID: 35749962]
  99. Comput Inform Nurs. 2021 May 4;39(11):725-735 [PMID: 33941719]
  100. Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Apr;99:104770 [PMID: 33516978]
  101. PeerJ. 2024 Oct 9;12:e18150 [PMID: 39399417]
  102. Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jun 30;12(13): [PMID: 38998848]
  103. Nurse Educ Today. 2010 Nov;30(8):827-32 [PMID: 20483188]
  104. Australas Emerg Care. 2024 Mar;27(1):37-41 [PMID: 37558556]
  105. Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Mar;50:17-24 [PMID: 28011333]
  106. J Prof Nurs. 2021 Jul-Aug;37(4):683-689 [PMID: 34187664]
  107. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2016 Sep/Oct;37(5):248-249 [PMID: 27740554]
  108. Nurse Educ. 2023 Mar-Apr 01;48(2):71-75 [PMID: 36332204]
  109. Comput Inform Nurs. 2005 Sep-Oct;23(5):256-62; quiz 263-4 [PMID: 16166827]
  110. AANA J. 2002 Jun;70(3):219-25 [PMID: 12078470]
  111. J Nurs Educ. 2007 Jun;46(6):269-76 [PMID: 17580739]
  112. PeerJ. 2021 Oct 12;9:e12245 [PMID: 34721971]

MeSH Term

Humans
Thinking
Students, Nursing
Simulation Training
Education, Nursing

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0thinkingtechnologycriticalSBLnursinglearningstudentsresearchenhancereviewstudiessupportedskillsusescopingaccordingCriticaleducationtechnologicalpedagogicalapproachsystematicallyconductedReviewsScopingdataincludedfindingsappliedcomputer-basedsimulationssimulatorsvirtualrealityrevealedshiftasynchronoussynchronousactivitiestheoreticalenhancementengagementmotivationpivotaltechnologicallysimulation-basedBACKGROUND:crucialskillprofessionmustfosteredSimulation-basedmodalitiesachievediversepreviousmappedOBJECTIVE:aimedmapMETHODS:frameworkArkseyO'MalleyreportedPRISMA-ScRPreferredReportingItemsSystematicMeta-AnalysesextensionguidelinessystematiccomprehensiveliteraturesearchperformedLILACSERICMEDLINEEmbasePsycINFOWebSciencedatabases2021repeated20232024Pairsauthorsindependentlyassessedtitlesabstractsfull-textpapersextractedunderwentsummativethematicanalysiscategorizedRESULTS:total4maincategoriesidentified:human-patientimmersiveothersacrosstimeusedhumanpatientdominantpartpublished201821/4448%incorporatedcombinationfoundationrangescientifictheoriesconceptualframeworksmodelsEnablersbarriersidentifiedwithinfollowingthemes:affinityavailabilityrealismaccessibilityvalidationreturninvestmentenhancedusingCONCLUSIONS:noticeableDescriptionsconsiderationscomparingsynthesizingresultstrendtowardblendededucationalcombiningUserproficiencyperceivedqualityimperativedevelopmentRealismplayrolesestablishmentrobustfoundationsstandardizedpracticeswillstrengthenevidenceobtainedSimulation-BasedLearningSupportedTechnologyEnhanceThinkingNursingStudents:Review

Similar Articles

Cited By