Promoting Racial Justice in Cancer Clinical Trials: Community Engaged Solutions for Bridging Gaps.

Deana M Williams, Chaya M Pflugeisen, Khadijah Ameen, Toby K Chen, Sheree Cooks, Bernadette C Ray, Melissa Foster, De Phillips, Lizbeth Sanchez, Keywanna Hardiman, Cynthia Smith, Jennifer Slim
Author Information
  1. Deana M Williams: MultiCare Health System Institute for Research & Innovation, Puyallup, Washington, USA. ORCID
  2. Chaya M Pflugeisen: MultiCare Health System Institute for Research & Innovation, Puyallup, Washington, USA.
  3. Khadijah Ameen: Clinical Trials Advisory Group, Puyallup, Washington, USA.
  4. Toby K Chen: Clinical Trials Advisory Group, Puyallup, Washington, USA.
  5. Sheree Cooks: Clinical Trials Advisory Group, Puyallup, Washington, USA.
  6. Bernadette C Ray: Clinical Trials Advisory Group, Puyallup, Washington, USA.
  7. Melissa Foster: Clinical Trials Advisory Group, Puyallup, Washington, USA.
  8. De Phillips: Clinical Trials Advisory Group, Puyallup, Washington, USA.
  9. Lizbeth Sanchez: Clinical Trials Advisory Group, Puyallup, Washington, USA.
  10. Keywanna Hardiman: Clinical Trials Advisory Group, Puyallup, Washington, USA.
  11. Cynthia Smith: MultiCare Health System Institute for Research & Innovation, Puyallup, Washington, USA.
  12. Jennifer Slim: MultiCare Cancer Institute, Tacoma, Washington, USA.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Racially and ethnically diverse populations are disproportionately burdened with and more likely to die from cancer than White populations but remain persistently underrepresented in cancer clinical trials. Thus, the safety and efficacy assessments of novel therapies may not apply to all populations, and guidelines are developed using trials that inadequately reflect our population. This study aims to explore healthcare experiences, cancer clinical trial perceptions, and solutions for bridging gaps in cancer clinical trials among communities of color.
METHODS: We held a series of five focus groups with 23 survivors and caregivers of color. These sessions explored perspectives around cancer care and research, clinical trials recruitment and messaging, and priorities around addressing the current insufficiency in representation in cancer research.
RESULTS: Our focus group data was analyzed using an inductive thematic approach. Four themes were present including (1) high motivation to participate in cancer trials and desire for better outreach and education within communities of color; (2) examples of just care as a model for improving access to clinical trials; (3) manifestations of power and inequity in healthcare inhibiting opportunities for clinical trial participation; and (4) the need for trust-building at the healthcare, community, and interpersonal levels.
CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that people of color strongly desire clinical trial options and discussions during cancer care, and trust-building is foundational to opening pathways to research participation. We offer concrete steps for increasing racial justice in cancer clinical trials that serve as a point of reflection and guidance for healthcare professionals, researchers, and clinical trials teams.

Keywords

References

  1. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81 [PMID: 18929686]
  2. Pediatrics. 2020 Dec;146(6): [PMID: 33214328]
  3. J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Oct 09;7(1):e236 [PMID: 38028335]
  4. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Jul;35(2):13-32 [PMID: 23557729]
  5. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Jan 20;21:100718 [PMID: 33604484]
  6. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2021 Apr 27;6(4):384-387 [PMID: 33997523]
  7. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Aug;6(8):605-607 [PMID: 34246352]
  8. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2014 Oct 16;9:26152 [PMID: 25326092]
  9. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jul 08;13:263 [PMID: 23835131]
  10. Cancer. 2014 Apr 1;120 Suppl 7:1091-6 [PMID: 24643646]
  11. Cancer. 2022 Nov 1;128(21):3860-3869 [PMID: 36107740]
  12. Account Res. 2023 Dec;30(7):516-529 [PMID: 35034527]
  13. Oncologist. 2018 Feb;23(2):243-246 [PMID: 29259072]
  14. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2023 Mar 1;17(1):55-69 [PMID: 36656606]
  15. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 Oct;18(10):1384-1393 [PMID: 34280379]
  16. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2024583 [PMID: 33165609]
  17. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jul 1;40(19):2163-2171 [PMID: 35588469]
  18. BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 3;20(1):840 [PMID: 32493245]
  19. Glob Bioeth. 2019 Dec 20;31(1):1-12 [PMID: 32002019]
  20. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 Jun 1;31(6):1243-1246 [PMID: 35642391]
  21. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2017 Aug;4(4):763-769 [PMID: 27604379]
  22. Am J Public Health. 2010 Aug;100(8):1380-7 [PMID: 20558798]
  23. Cancer. 2021 Sep 15;127(18):3282-3289 [PMID: 33904590]
  24. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2023 Oct;10(5):2552-2564 [PMID: 36344747]
  25. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2019 May;44(5):148-172 [PMID: 30545650]
  26. Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Jul;112:107750 [PMID: 37062168]
  27. JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Sep;18(9):614-632 [PMID: 35671413]
  28. J Healthc Sci Humanit. 2020 Fall;10(1):104-123 [PMID: 36818758]
  29. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2022 Apr;42:1-11 [PMID: 35687825]
  30. Ethn Dis. 2022 Jan 20;32(1):61-68 [PMID: 35106045]
  31. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e213789 [PMID: 33787910]
  32. Cancer. 2020 Jan 1;126(9):1958-1968 [PMID: 32147815]

Grants

  1. FY23-IDCT-05/Andy Hill CARE Fund

MeSH Term

Humans
Neoplasms
Clinical Trials as Topic
Female
Male
Social Justice
Focus Groups
Middle Aged
Adult
Aged
Healthcare Disparities
Cancer Survivors
Patient Selection
Caregivers

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By