Spouses' personalities and marital satisfaction in Chinese families.

Li Jia, Gerrit Antonides, Zhuomin Liu
Author Information
  1. Li Jia: School of Economics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  2. Gerrit Antonides: Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands.
  3. Zhuomin Liu: School of Economics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Abstract

Introduction: Considering the traditional Confucian values prevalent in Chinese society, we study the effects of the spouses' personalities and household sociodemographic circumstances on the marital satisfaction of marriage partners.
Methods: We evaluate the factors that contribute to marital satisfaction, using the 2018 wave of the Chinese Family Panel Survey, including 6,603 households. We use information on both spouses' Big-Five personality traits, and marital satisfaction. In addition, the effects of the household's sociodemographic factors on the spouses' marital satisfaction are estimated. We employ the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model to estimate the effects, using simultaneous equation modeling.
Results: We find significant actor effects of personality, i.e., agreeableness, openness, conscientiousness, and extroversion, but few partner effects on marital satisfaction. In addition to other socioeconomic effects, we find strong actor effects of subjective social status on marital satisfaction for both spouses. The wife's level of education had a negative effect on her marital satisfaction.
Discussion: The effects of the spouses' personalities and sociodemographic circumstances on their marital satisfaction fit the Confucian values fostered in China. The wife's double burden of having a job and taking care of household duties, negatively affecting her marital satisfaction, may be alleviated by proper government policies.

Keywords

References

  1. J Fam Psychol. 2004 Dec;18(4):564-74 [PMID: 15598162]
  2. Demography. 1997 Aug;34(3):311-30 [PMID: 9275242]
  3. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Jun;106(6):978-96 [PMID: 24841100]
  4. J Pers. 2019 Dec;87(6):1189-1205 [PMID: 30771262]
  5. J Appl Psychol. 2000 Feb;85(1):125-31 [PMID: 10740963]
  6. Psychol Bull. 2004 Jul;130(4):574-600 [PMID: 15250814]
  7. J Popul Econ. 2018 Apr;31(2):337-362 [PMID: 31598035]
  8. J Pers. 1997 Mar;65(1):107-36 [PMID: 9143146]
  9. Front Psychol. 2011 Aug 01;2:178 [PMID: 21866227]
  10. J Pers. 2008 Oct;76(5):1231-66 [PMID: 18665892]
  11. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980 Apr;38(4):668-78 [PMID: 7381680]
  12. BMC Psychol. 2020 Feb 7;8(1):15 [PMID: 32033583]
  13. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Oct;99(4):690-702 [PMID: 20718544]
  14. AJS. 2016 Nov;122(3):886-929 [PMID: 28082749]
  15. Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 23;12:691460 [PMID: 34367016]
  16. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1991 Autumn;37(3):201-13 [PMID: 1743905]
  17. Clin Gerontol. 2023 Oct 27;:1-13 [PMID: 37888884]
  18. Fam Process. 2019 Jun;58(2):478-495 [PMID: 29603205]
  19. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985 Jun;48(6):1398-412 [PMID: 4020604]
  20. Demography. 2013 Aug;50(4):1499-520 [PMID: 23821472]
  21. Popul Dev Rev. 2003 Jun;29(2):255-276 [PMID: 19129930]
  22. Annu Rev Sociol. 1997;23:431-53 [PMID: 12348280]
  23. Soc Sci Res. 2008 Dec;37(4):1216-34 [PMID: 19227699]
  24. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Apr;68(4):653-63 [PMID: 7738768]
  25. J Marriage Fam. 2014 Oct 1;76(5):930-948 [PMID: 25221351]
  26. Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 28;13:1008210 [PMID: 36389526]
  27. Psychol Sci. 2009 May;20(5):543-5 [PMID: 19389134]
  28. Psychol Bull. 1995 Jul;118(1):3-34 [PMID: 7644604]
  29. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Aug;79(2):251-9 [PMID: 10948978]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0maritalsatisfactioneffectsspouses'ChinesepersonalitiessociodemographicpersonalityactorConfucianvalueshouseholdcircumstancesfactorsusingadditionfindpartnerwife'sIntroduction:ConsideringtraditionalprevalentsocietystudymarriagepartnersMethods:evaluatecontribute2018waveFamilyPanelSurveyincluding6603householdsuseinformationBig-Fivetraitshousehold'sestimatedemployActor-PartnerInterdependenceModelestimatesimultaneousequationmodelingResults:significantieagreeablenessopennessconscientiousnessextroversionsocioeconomicstrongsubjectivesocialstatusspousesleveleducationnegativeeffectDiscussion:fitfosteredChinadoubleburdenjobtakingcaredutiesnegativelyaffectingmayalleviatedpropergovernmentpoliciesSpouses'familieshappiness

Similar Articles

Cited By