Decision tree model for predicting ovarian tumor malignancy based on clinical markers and preoperative circulating blood cells.

Yingjia Li, Xingping Zhao, Yanhua Zhou, Lina Gong, Enuo Peng
Author Information
  1. Yingjia Li: The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410013, China.
  2. Xingping Zhao: The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410013, China.
  3. Yanhua Zhou: The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410013, China.
  4. Lina Gong: The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410013, China.
  5. Enuo Peng: The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410013, China. pengena@163.com.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Ovarian cancer is a serious malignant tumor threatening women's health. The early diagnosis and effective treatments of ovarian cancer remain inadequate, and about 70% of ovarian cancers are in advanced stages when discovered. This study aimed to use the decision tree method of artificial intelligence machine learning to build a model for predicting the benign and malignant degree of ovarian cancer patients.
STUDY DESIGN: A total of 758 patients were included in the study. These patients were diagnosed by B-ultrasound, CT or MR. The clinicopathological features and circulating blood cell indexes were recorded and analyzed. The prediction model of benign and malignant ovarian tumors was constructed by CART decision tree, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to evaluate the predictive value of the decision tree model.
RESULTS: It was found that significant predictor variables included age, disease duration, patient general condition and menopausal status, ascites, tumor size, HE4, CA125, ROMA index, and blood routine related indicators (except for basophil count percentage and absolute value). In the constructed decision tree model, ROMA_after was the root node with the maximum information gain. ROMA_after, Mass size (MR/CT), HE4, CA125, platelet number, lymphocyte ratio, white blood cell count, post-menopause, hematocrit and mean platelet volume were important indicators in the decision tree model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of this model for predicting benign and malignant ovarian cancer was 0.86.
CONCLUSIONS: The decision tree model was successfully constructed based on clinical indicators and preoperative circulating blood cells, and showed better results in predicting benign and malignant ovarian cancer than alone imaging indicators or biomarkers among our data, which means that our model can more accurately predict benign and malignant ovarian cancer.

Keywords

References

  1. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019 May 27;57(6):901-910 [PMID: 30838840]
  2. Thromb Res. 2018 Apr;164 Suppl 1:S148-S152 [PMID: 29703474]
  3. J Ovarian Res. 2018 Oct 1;11(1):88 [PMID: 30270814]
  4. J Ovarian Res. 2020 Apr 25;13(1):46 [PMID: 32334618]
  5. Front Big Data. 2024 Jul 01;7:1402384 [PMID: 39011467]
  6. Clin Chim Acta. 2020 Feb;501:33-41 [PMID: 31816288]
  7. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 May;138(1):71-5 [PMID: 17644243]
  8. Cancer Lett. 2020 Jan 1;468:59-71 [PMID: 31610267]
  9. Protein Cell. 2023 Jun 7;14(6):579-590 [PMID: 36905391]
  10. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jul;69(4):280-304 [PMID: 31099893]
  11. Curr Med Sci. 2020 Feb;40(1):184-191 [PMID: 32166682]
  12. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Jan;112(1):40-6 [PMID: 18851871]
  13. BMJ. 2020 Nov 9;371:m3773 [PMID: 33168565]
  14. Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 24;13(1):1367 [PMID: 36693981]
  15. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2023 Jun;235:107536 [PMID: 37060685]
  16. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Mar;13(3):285-91 [PMID: 22257524]
  17. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2019 Aug;40(4):302-318 [PMID: 31375171]
  18. BMC Urol. 2020 Mar 19;20(1):31 [PMID: 32192483]
  19. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2021 Jun;58(4):275-296 [PMID: 33739235]
  20. Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Nov 1;28(21):4669-4676 [PMID: 36037307]
  21. Nucl Med Commun. 2007 Aug;28(8):589-95 [PMID: 17625380]
  22. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Nov 24;13:963559 [PMID: 36506042]
  23. JCI Insight. 2022 Jun 22;7(12): [PMID: 35552285]
  24. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022 Aug 1;32(8):1009-1016 [PMID: 35437272]
  25. Mol Cancer. 2014 May 29;13:129 [PMID: 24886523]
  26. Med Sci Monit. 2017 Oct 25;23:5090-5095 [PMID: 29069071]
  27. Haemophilia. 2015 Nov;21(6):715-22 [PMID: 26248714]
  28. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021 Aug 13;59(12):1954-1962 [PMID: 34388324]
  29. Clin Transl Med. 2020 Feb 10;9(1):6 [PMID: 32037496]
  30. Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 May;28(5):1311-1327 [PMID: 29451087]
  31. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2015 May;26(5):1048-59 [PMID: 25051560]
  32. Clin Chim Acta. 2005 Sep;359(1-2):1-26 [PMID: 15936746]

MeSH Term

Humans
Female
Decision Trees
Ovarian Neoplasms
Middle Aged
Adult
Biomarkers, Tumor
Aged
Machine Learning

Chemicals

Biomarkers, Tumor

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0modelovariantreecancermalignantdecisionbloodbenignpredictingcirculatingindicatorstumorpatientsconstructedcellsOvarianstudylearningincludedcellreceiveroperatingcharacteristiccurvevaluesizeHE4CA125countROMA_afterplateletbasedclinicalpreoperativeDecisionOBJECTIVE:seriousthreateningwomen'shealthearlydiagnosiseffectivetreatmentsremaininadequate70%cancersadvancedstagesdiscoveredaimedusemethodartificialintelligencemachinebuilddegreeSTUDYDESIGN:total758diagnosedB-ultrasoundCTMRclinicopathologicalfeaturesindexesrecordedanalyzedpredictiontumorsCARTROCdrawnevaluatepredictiveRESULTS:foundsignificantpredictorvariablesagediseasedurationpatientgeneralconditionmenopausalstatusascitesROMAindexroutinerelatedexceptbasophilpercentageabsoluterootnodemaximuminformationgainMassMR/CTnumberlymphocyteratiowhitepost-menopausehematocritmeanvolumeimportantarea086CONCLUSIONS:successfullyshowedbetterresultsaloneimagingbiomarkersamongdatameanscanaccuratelypredictmalignancymarkersMachinePredictionPreoperative

Similar Articles

Cited By